1,537 research outputs found

    How to find real-world applications for compressive sensing

    Full text link
    The potential of compressive sensing (CS) has spurred great interest in the research community and is a fast growing area of research. However, research translating CS theory into practical hardware and demonstrating clear and significant benefits with this hardware over current, conventional imaging techniques has been limited. This article helps researchers to find those niche applications where the CS approach provides substantial gain over conventional approaches by articulating lessons learned in finding one such application; sea skimming missile detection. As a proof of concept, it is demonstrated that a simplified CS missile detection architecture and algorithm provides comparable results to the conventional imaging approach but using a smaller FPA. The primary message is that all of the excitement surrounding CS is necessary and appropriate for encouraging our creativity but we all must also take off our "rose colored glasses" and critically judge our ideas, methods and results relative to conventional imaging approaches.Comment: 10 page

    Optimal Coded Diffraction Patterns for Practical Phase Retrieval

    Full text link
    Phase retrieval, a long-established challenge for recovering a complex-valued signal from its Fourier intensity measurements, has attracted significant interest because of its far-flung applications in optical imaging. To enhance accuracy, researchers introduce extra constraints to the measuring procedure by including a random aperture mask in the optical path that randomly modulates the light projected on the target object and gives the coded diffraction patterns (CDP). It is known that random masks are non-bandlimited and can lead to considerable high-frequency components in the Fourier intensity measurements. These high-frequency components can be beyond the Nyquist frequency of the optical system and are thus ignored by the phase retrieval optimization algorithms, resulting in degraded reconstruction performances. Recently, our team developed a binary green noise masking scheme that can significantly reduce the high-frequency components in the measurement. However, the scheme cannot be extended to generate multiple-level aperture masks. This paper proposes a two-stage optimization algorithm to generate multi-level random masks named OptMask\textit{OptMask} that can also significantly reduce high-frequency components in the measurements but achieve higher accuracy than the binary masking scheme. Extensive experiments on a practical optical platform were conducted. The results demonstrate the superiority and practicality of the proposed OptMask\textit{OptMask} over the existing masking schemes for CDP phase retrieval

    Design and Analysis of a Spatial Neutron Modulator for Neutron Imaging via Compressive Sensing

    Get PDF
    The ability to characterize materials is an important aspect when performing any sort of materials science experiment. When performing studies where understanding the molecular-level characteristics are critical such as for molecular bonding in batteries or complex polymers, analysis techniques such as vibrational spectroscopy are often used. At the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory the VISION instrument performs vibrational spectroscopy using neutrons. The reason for utilizing neutrons includes aspects such as increased penetration depth into the sample and high sensitivity; however, currently it is only possible to perform bulk sample measurements. By utilizing a technique known as compressive sensing it will be made possible to map material properties and characteristics across an entire sample.This thesis discusses the design process for creating a spatial neutron modulator that will allow for compressive sensing to be used within VISION as well as the creation of a testable prototype and analysis of the prototypeโ€™s performance. In order to test the performance of the system as well as the compressive sensing algorithm the prototype is tested using an optical set-up. This approach allows for the concepts to be tested on a cheaper scale to ensure feasibility of the design and compressive sensing algorithm prior to the creation of the final system

    Adaptive Sampling in Particle Image Velocimetry

    Get PDF

    ๋“€์–ผ๋ฏธ๋Ÿฌ ๋ผ์ด๋‹ค ์ด๋ฏธ์ง•์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํƒ€์ด๋ฐ์ด ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. Lee, Hyuk-Jae.In recent years, active sensor technologies such as light detection and ranging (LIDAR) have been intensively studied in theory and widely adopted in many applications, i.e., self-driving cars, robotics and sensing. Generally, the spatial resolution of a depth-acquisition device, such as a LiDAR sensor, is limited because of a slow acquisition speed. To accurately reconstruct a depth image from a limited spatial resolution, a two-stage sampling process has been widely used. However, two-stage sampling uses an irregular sampling pattern for the sampling operation, which requires a large amount of computation for reconstruction. A mathematical formulation of a LiDAR system demonstrates that the existing two-stage sampling does not satisfy its timing constraint for practical use. Therefore, designing a LiDAR system with an efficient sampling algorithm is a significant technological challenge. Firstly, this thesis addresses the problem of adopting the state-of-art laser marking system of a dual-mirror deflection scanner when creating a high-definition LIDAR system. Galvanometer scanners are modeled and parameterized based on concepts of their controllers and the well-known raster scanning method. The scanning strategy is then modeled and analyzed considering the physical scanning movement and the minimum spanning tree. From this analysis, the link between the quality of the captured image of a field of view (FOV) and the scanning speed is revealed. Furthermore, sufficient conditions are derived to indicate that the acquired image fully covers the FOV and that the captured objects are well aligned under a specific frame rate. Finally, a sample LIDAR system is developed to illustrate the proposed concepts. Secondly, to overcome the drawbacks of two-stage sampling, we propose a new sampling method that reduces the computational complexity and memory requirements by generating the optimal representatives of a sampling pattern in down-sample data. A sampling pattern is derived from a k-NN expanding operation from the downsampled representatives. The proposed algorithm is designed to preserve the object boundary by restricting the expansion-operation only to the object boundary or complex texture. In addition, the proposed algorithm runs in linear-time complexity and reduces the memory requirements using a down-sampling ratio. Experimental results with Middlebury datasets and Brown laser-range datasets are presented. Thirdly, state-of-the-art adaptive methods such as two-step sampling are highly effective while addressing indoor, less complex scenes at a moderately low sampling rate. However, their performance is relatively low in complex on-road environments, particularly when the sampling rate of the measuring equipment is low. To address this problem, this thesis proposes a region-of-interest-(ROI)-based sampling algorithm in on-road environments for autonomous driving. With the aid of fast and accurate road and object detection algorithms, particularly those based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), the proposed sampling algorithm utilizes the semantic information and effectively distributes samples in road, object, and background areas. Experimental results with KITTI datasets are presented.์ตœ๊ทผ LIDAR (light detection and ranging)์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋Šฅ๋™์  ์„ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์ง‘์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ, ๋กœ๋ด‡, ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ LiDAR ์„ผ์„œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹ฌ๋„์ธก์ •์žฅ์น˜๋Š” ๋Š๋ฆฐ ์†๋„ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ œํ•œ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ œํ•œ๋œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹ฌ๋„ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์€ ๋ถˆ๊ทœ์น™์ ์ธ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ํŒจํ„ด์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๊ณผ์ •์— ๋งŽ์€ ์–‘์˜ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์€ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํƒ€์ด๋ฐ ์ œ์•ฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ๊ณผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ตœ์‹ ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋งˆํ‚น ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ dual-mirror ์Šค์บ๋„ˆ์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. Galvanometer ์Šค์บ๋„ˆ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ์™€ ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋ž˜์Šคํ„ฐ ์Šค์บ” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ Galvanometer ์Šค์บ๋„ˆ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์›€์ง์ž„๊ณผ ์ตœ์†Œ ์‹ ์žฅ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” FOV (field of view)๋กœ ์บก์ณ๋œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ณผ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํš๋“๋œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๊ฐ€ FOV๋ฅผ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์บก์ณ๋œ object๋“ค์ด ํŠน์ • ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ์—์„œ ์ž˜ ์ •๋ ฌ๋จ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์ถฉ๋ถ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ LIDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์˜ ๋‹จ์ ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋‹ค์šด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ํŒจํ„ด์˜ ์ตœ์  ํ‘œํ˜„์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ ๋ณต์žก๋„์™€ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ํŒจํ„ด์€ ๋‹ค์šด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋œ ํ‘œํ˜„์˜ k-NN ํ™•์žฅ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋„์ถœ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํ…์Šค์ฒ˜์— ํ•œํ•ด์„œ ํ™•์žฅ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กดํ•˜๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ณต์žก๋„๋กœ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋‹ค์šด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ค„์ธ๋‹ค. Middlebury ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹๊ณผ Brown laser-range ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ตœ์‹ ์˜ ์ ์‘์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๋น„๊ต์  ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ๋กœ ์‹ค๋‚ด์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์žฅ๋ฉด๋“ค์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋„๋กœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋Š”, ํŠนํžˆ ์ธก์ • ์žฅ๋น„์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—, ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋„๋กœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ ROI (region-of-interest) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ CNN (convolutional neural network) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋„๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ๊ฐ์ง€ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, semantic ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๋„๋กœ, ๋ฌผ์ฒด, ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ์˜์—ญ์— ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋“ค์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฐฐํ•œ๋‹ค. KITTI ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ๋‹ค.Abstract i Table of Contents iii List of Figures vii List of Tables xi Chapter 1: Introduction ๏ผ‘ 1.1. Overview ๏ผ‘ 1.2. Scope and contributions ๏ผ’ 1.3. Thesis Outlines ๏ผ“ Chapter 2: Related work ๏ผ” 2.1. LiDAR sensors ๏ผ” 2.2. Sampling ๏ผ– 2.2.1. Sampling problem definition ๏ผ– 2.2.2. Sampling model ๏ผ— 2.2.3. Oracle Random sampling (Gradient-based sampling) ๏ผ˜ 2.3. Reconstruction ๏ผ™ Chapter 3: Dual-Mirror LiDAR ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 3.1. Introduction ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 3.1.1. Related work ๏ผ‘๏ผ’ 3.2. Modelling a controller of dual-mirror scanners ๏ผ‘๏ผ“ 3.2.1. Dual-mirror scanners ๏ผ‘๏ผ“ 3.2.2. Controller Model ๏ผ‘๏ผ• 3.2.2.1. FOV representation ๏ผ‘๏ผ• 3.2.2.2. Timing constraints ๏ผ‘๏ผ– 3.2.2.3. Maximum Speed of LiDAR scanners ๏ผ‘๏ผ— 3.3. LiDAR scanning optimization problem ๏ผ‘๏ผ˜ 3.3.1. Scanning Problem ๏ผ‘๏ผ™ 3.3.2. Optimal scanning pattern ๏ผ’๏ผ 3.3.2.1. Grid-graph representation of Field of View ๏ผ’๏ผ 3.3.2.2. Optimal scanning pattern ๏ผ’๏ผ‘ 3.3.2.3. Combining an optimal sampling pattern with timing constraints ๏ผ’4 3.4. LiDAR system Prototype ๏ผ“๏ผ 3.4.1. System overview ๏ผ“๏ผ 3.4.2. Speed evaluation ๏ผ“๏ผ’ 3.4.3. Subjective Evaluation ๏ผ“๏ผ“ 3.4.4. Accuracy Evaluation ๏ผ“๏ผ– Chapter 4: Sampling for Dual-Mirror LiDAR: Sampling Model and Algorithm ๏ผ“๏ผ˜ 4.1. Introduction ๏ผ“๏ผ˜ 4.2. Sampling Model for Dual-Mirror LiDAR ๏ผ”๏ผ‘ 4.2.1. Timing constraint ๏ผ”๏ผ‘ 4.2.2. Memory-space constraint ๏ผ”๏ผ• 4.2.3. New sampling problem with constraints ๏ผ”๏ผ— 4.3. Proposed sampling Algorithm and Its Properties ๏ผ”๏ผ˜ 4.3.1. Downsampling and k-NN expanding operator ๏ผ”๏ผ˜ 4.3.2. Proposed Sampling Algorithm with k-NN Expanding ๏ผ•๏ผ’ 4.3.3. Example with Synthetic Data ๏ผ•๏ผ— 4.3.4. Proposed sampling algorithm with interpolation ๏ผ•๏ผ™ 4.3.5. Timing and memory constraints ๏ผ–๏ผ’ 4.3.5.1. Timing constraint ๏ผ–๏ผ’ 4.3.5.2. Memory constraint ๏ผ–๏ผ“ 4.4. Experimental results ๏ผ–๏ผ” 4.4.1. Comparison on the conventional sampling problem ๏ผ–๏ผ• 4.4.1.1. Subjective comparison ๏ผ–๏ผ• 4.4.1.2. Quantitative comparison ๏ผ–๏ผ• 4.4.2. Comparison on the new sampling problem for LiDAR ๏ผ–๏ผ™ 4.4.2.1. Compression ratios ๏ผ–๏ผ™ 4.4.2.2. Quantitative evaluation with Peak-signal-to-noise-ratio ๏ผ—๏ผ 4.4.2.3. Quantitative evaluation with Percentages of bad pixels ๏ผ—๏ผ’ 4.4.3. Subjective evaluation ๏ผ—๏ผ— 4.4.4. Proposed grid sampling and grid sampling method ๏ผ—๏ผ™ 4.4.4.1. Middlebury datasets ๏ผ—๏ผ™ 4.4.4.2. Brown Laser range datasets ๏ผ˜๏ผ Chapter 5: ROI-based LiDAR Sampling in On-Road Environment for Autonomous Driving ๏ผ˜๏ผ” 5.1. Introduction ๏ผ˜๏ผ” 5.2. Proposed ROI-based sampling algorithm ๏ผ˜๏ผ— 5.2.1. Motivating example ๏ผ˜๏ผ— 5.2.2. ROI-based Sampling Problem ๏ผ™๏ผ‘ 5.2.3. Proposed ROI-based sampling algorithm ๏ผ™๏ผ“ 5.2.4. Practical considerations ๏ผ™๏ผ” 5.2.5. Distortion optimization problem ๏ผ™๏ผ• 5.3. Experimental results ๏ผ™๏ผ– 5.3.1. Datasets ๏ผ™๏ผ– 5.3.2. Evaluation with different parameters ๏ผ™๏ผ™ 5.3.3. Object and quantitative comparisons ๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ’ Chapter 6: Implementation Issues ๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ˜ 6.1. Implementation of gradient-based sampling ๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ˜ 6.2. System overview ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ Chapter 7: Conclusion ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ“ References ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ• ์ดˆ๋ก ๏ผ‘๏ผ’๏ผ”Docto

    Signal processing for microwave imaging systems with very sparse array

    Get PDF
    This dissertation investigates image reconstruction algorithms for near-field, two dimensional (2D) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) using compressed sensing (CS) based methods. In conventional SAR imaging systems, acquiring higher-quality images requires longer measuring time and/or more elements in an antenna array. Millimeter wave imaging systems using evenly-spaced antenna arrays also have spatial resolution constraints due to the large size of the antennas. This dissertation applies the CS principle to a bistatic antenna array that consists of separate transmitter and receiver subarrays very sparsely and non-uniformly distributed on a 2D plane. One pair of transmitter and receiver elements is turned on at a time, and different pairs are turned on in series to achieve synthetic aperture and controlled random measurements. This dissertation contributes to CS-hardware co-design by proposing several signal-processing methods, including monostatic approximation, re-gridding, adaptive interpolation, CS-based reconstruction, and image denoising. The proposed algorithms enable the successful implementation of CS-SAR hardware cameras, improve the resolution and image quality, and reduce hardware cost and experiment time. This dissertation also describes and analyzes the results for each independent method. The algorithms proposed in this dissertation break the limitations of hardware configuration. By using 16 x 16 transmit and receive elements with an average space of 16 mm, the sparse-array camera achieves the image resolution of 2 mm. This is equivalent to six percent of the ฮป/4 evenly-spaced array. The reconstructed images achieve similar quality as the fully-sampled array with the structure similarity (SSIM) larger than 0.8 and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) greater than 25 --Abstract, page iv
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore