Recursive Rewarding Modified Adaptive Cell Decomposition (RR-MACD): A Dynamic Path Planning Algorithm for UAVs

[EN] A relevant task in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) flight is path planning in 3D environments. This task must be completed using the least possible computing time. The aim of this article is to combine methodologies to optimise the task in time and offer a complete 3D trajectory. The flight environment will be considered as a 3D adaptive discrete mesh, where grids are created with minimal refinement in the search for collision-free spaces. The proposed path planning algorithm for UAV saves computational time and memory resources compared with classical techniques. With the construction of the discrete meshing, a cost response methodology is applied as a discrete deterministic finite automaton (DDFA). A set of optimal partial responses, calculated recursively, indicates the collision-free spaces in the final path for the UAV flight.The authors would like to acknowledge the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for providing funding through the project DPI2015-71443-R and the local administration Generalitat Valenciana through the project GV/2017/029. Franklin Samaniego thanks IFTH (Instituto de Fomento al Talento Humano) Ecuador (2015-AR2Q9209), for its sponsorship of this work.Samaniego-Riera, FE.; Sanchís Saez, J.; Garcia-Nieto, S.; Simarro Fernández, R. (2019). Recursive Rewarding Modified Adaptive Cell Decomposition (RR-MACD): A Dynamic Path Planning Algorithm for UAVs. Electronics. 8(3):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8030306S12183Valavanis, K. P., & Vachtsevanos, G. J. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9707-120 Great UAV Applications Areas for Droneshttp://air-vid.com/wp/20-great-uav-applications-areas-drones/Industry Experts—Microdroneshttps://www.microdrones.com/en/industry-experts/Li, J., & Han, Y. (2017). Optimal Resource Allocation for Packet Delay Minimization in Multi-Layer UAV Networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 21(3), 580-583. doi:10.1109/lcomm.2016.2626293Stuchlík, R., Stachoň, Z., Láska, K., & Kubíček, P. (2015). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle – Efficient mapping tool available for recent research in polar regions. Czech Polar Reports, 5(2), 210-221. doi:10.5817/cpr2015-2-18Pulver, A., & Wei, R. (2018). Optimizing the spatial location of medical drones. Applied Geography, 90, 9-16. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.11.009Claesson, A., Svensson, L., Nordberg, P., Ringh, M., Rosenqvist, M., Djarv, T., … Hollenberg, J. (2017). Drones may be used to save lives in out of hospital cardiac arrest due to drowning. Resuscitation, 114, 152-156. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.01.003Reineman, B. D., Lenain, L., Statom, N. M., & Melville, W. K. (2013). Development and Testing of Instrumentation for UAV-Based Flux Measurements within Terrestrial and Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layers. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 30(7), 1295-1319. doi:10.1175/jtech-d-12-00176.1LaValle, S. M. (2006). Planning Algorithms. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546877Elbanhawi, M., & Simic, M. (2014). Sampling-Based Robot Motion Planning: A Review. IEEE Access, 2, 56-77. doi:10.1109/access.2014.2302442Hernandez, K., Bacca, B., & Posso, B. (2017). Multi-goal Path Planning Autonomous System for Picking up and Delivery Tasks in Mobile Robotics. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 15(2), 232-238. doi:10.1109/tla.2017.7854617Kohlbrecher, S., von Stryk, O., Meyer, J., & Klingauf, U. (2011). A flexible and scalable SLAM system with full 3D motion estimation. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics. doi:10.1109/ssrr.2011.6106777Aguilar, W., & Morales, S. (2016). 3D Environment Mapping Using the Kinect V2 and Path Planning Based on RRT Algorithms. Electronics, 5(4), 70. doi:10.3390/electronics5040070Aguilar, W. G., Morales, S., Ruiz, H., & Abad, V. (2017). RRT* GL Based Optimal Path Planning for Real-Time Navigation of UAVs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 585-595. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59147-6_50Yao, P., Wang, H., & Su, Z. (2015). Hybrid UAV path planning based on interfered fluid dynamical system and improved RRT. IECON 2015 - 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. doi:10.1109/iecon.2015.7392202Yan, F., Liu, Y.-S., & Xiao, J.-Z. (2013). Path Planning in Complex 3D Environments Using a Probabilistic Roadmap Method. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 10(6), 525-533. doi:10.1007/s11633-013-0750-9Yeh, H.-Y., Thomas, S., Eppstein, D., & Amato, N. M. (2012). UOBPRM: A uniformly distributed obstacle-based PRM. 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385875Denny, J., & Amatoo, N. M. (2013). Toggle PRM: A Coordinated Mapping of C-Free and C-Obstacle in Arbitrary Dimension. Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics X, 297-312. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36279-8_18Li, Q., Wei, C., Wu, J., & Zhu, X. (2014). Improved PRM method of low altitude penetration trajectory planning for UAVs. Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. doi:10.1109/cgncc.2014.7007587Ortiz-Arroyo, D. (2015). A hybrid 3D path planning method for UAVs. 2015 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS). doi:10.1109/red-uas.2015.7440999Thanou, M., & Tzes, A. (2014). Distributed visibility-based coverage using a swarm of UAVs in known 3D-terrains. 2014 6th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP). doi:10.1109/isccsp.2014.6877904Qu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Optimal flight path planning for UAVs in 3-D threat environment. 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). doi:10.1109/icuas.2014.6842250Fang, Z., Luan, C., & Sun, Z. (2017). A 2D Voronoi-Based Random Tree for Path Planning in Complicated 3D Environments. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 433-445. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48036-7_31Khuswendi, T., Hindersah, H., & Adiprawita, W. (2011). UAV path planning using potential field and modified receding horizon A* 3D algorithm. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics. doi:10.1109/iceei.2011.6021579Chen, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). The Three-Dimension Path Planning of UAV Based on Improved Artificial Potential Field in Dynamic Environment. 2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/ihmsc.2013.181Rivera, D. M., Prieto, F. A., & Ramirez, R. (2012). Trajectory Planning for UAVs in 3D Environments Using a Moving Band in Potential Sigmoid Fields. 2012 Brazilian Robotics Symposium and Latin American Robotics Symposium. doi:10.1109/sbr-lars.2012.26Liu Lifen, Shi Ruoxin, Li Shuandao, & Wu Jiang. (2016). Path planning for UAVS based on improved artificial potential field method through changing the repulsive potential function. 2016 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (CGNCC). doi:10.1109/cgncc.2016.7829099Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269-271. doi:10.1007/bf01386390Verscheure, L., Peyrodie, L., Makni, N., Betrouni, N., Maouche, S., & Vermandel, M. (2010). Dijkstra’s algorithm applied to 3D skeletonization of the brain vascular tree: Evaluation and application to symbolic. 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5626112Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968). A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2), 100-107. doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300136Ferguson, D., & Stentz, A. (s. f.). Field D*: An Interpolation-Based Path Planner and Replanner. Robotics Research, 239-253. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48113-3_22De Filippis, L., Guglieri, G., & Quagliotti, F. (2011). Path Planning Strategies for UAVS in 3D Environments. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 65(1-4), 247-264. doi:10.1007/s10846-011-9568-2Gautam, S. A., & Verma, N. (2014). Path planning for unmanned aerial vehicle based on genetic algorithm & artificial neural network in 3D. 2014 International Conference on Data Mining and Intelligent Computing (ICDMIC). doi:10.1109/icdmic.2014.6954257Maturana, D., & Scherer, S. (2015). 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for landing zone detection from LiDAR. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139679Iswanto, I., Wahyunggoro, O., & Imam Cahyadi, A. (2016). Quadrotor Path Planning Based on Modified Fuzzy Cell Decomposition Algorithm. TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 14(2), 655. doi:10.12928/telkomnika.v14i2.2989Duan, H., Yu, Y., Zhang, X., & Shao, S. (2010). Three-dimension path planning for UCAV using hybrid meta-heuristic ACO-DE algorithm. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 18(8), 1104-1115. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2009.10.006He, Y., Zeng, Q., Liu, J., Xu, G., & Deng, X. (2013). Path planning for indoor UAV based on Ant Colony Optimization. 2013 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). doi:10.1109/ccdc.2013.6561444Zhang, Y., Wu, L., & Wang, S. (2013). UCAV Path Planning by Fitness-Scaling Adaptive Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2013/705238Goel, U., Varshney, S., Jain, A., Maheshwari, S., & Shukla, A. (2018). Three Dimensional Path Planning for UAVs in Dynamic Environment using Glow-worm Swarm Optimization. Procedia Computer Science, 133, 230-239. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.028YongBo, C., YueSong, M., JianQiao, Y., XiaoLong, S., & Nuo, X. (2017). Three-dimensional unmanned aerial vehicle path planning using modified wolf pack search algorithm. Neurocomputing, 266, 445-457. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.059Wang, G.-G., Chu, H. E., & Mirjalili, S. (2016). Three-dimensional path planning for UCAV using an improved bat algorithm. Aerospace Science and Technology, 49, 231-238. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2015.11.040Aghababa, M. P. (2012). 3D path planning for underwater vehicles using five evolutionary optimization algorithms avoiding static and energetic obstacles. Applied Ocean Research, 38, 48-62. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2012.06.002Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Tran, D. T., & De Keyser, R. (2016). Heuristic approaches in robot path planning: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 86, 13-28. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.001Szirmay-Kalos, L., & Márton, G. (1998). Worst-case versus average case complexity of ray-shooting. Computing, 61(2), 103-131. doi:10.1007/bf02684409Berger, M. J., & Oliger, J. (1984). Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 53(3), 484-512. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(84)90073-1Min, C., & Gibou, F. (2006). A second order accurate projection method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations on non-graded adaptive grids. Journal of Computational Physics, 219(2), 912-929. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2006.07.019Hasbestan, J. J., & Senocak, I. (2018). Binarized-octree generation for Cartesian adaptive mesh refinement around immersed geometries. Journal of Computational Physics, 368, 179-195. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.039Pantano, C., Deiterding, R., Hill, D. J., & Pullin, D. I. (2007). A low numerical dissipation patch-based adaptive mesh refinement method for large-eddy simulation of compressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 221(1), 63-87. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.011Ryde, J., & Hu, H. (2009). 3D mapping with multi-resolution occupied voxel lists. Autonomous Robots, 28(2), 169-185. doi:10.1007/s10514-009-9158-3Samet, H., & Kochut, A. (s. f.). Octree approximation an compression methods. Proceedings. First International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission. doi:10.1109/tdpvt.2002.1024101Samaniego, F., Sanchis, J., Garcia-Nieto, S., & Simarro, R. (2017). UAV motion planning and obstacle avoidance based on adaptive 3D cell decomposition: Continuous space vs discrete space. 2017 IEEE Second Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM). doi:10.1109/etcm.2017.8247533Skoldstam, M., Akesson, K., & Fabian, M. (2007). Modeling of discrete event systems using finite automata with variables. 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. doi:10.1109/cdc.2007.4434894Yang, Y.-H. E., & Prasanna, V. K. (2011). Space-time tradeoff in regular expression matching with semi-deterministic finite automata. 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM. doi:10.1109/infcom.2011.5934986Normativa Sobre Drones en España [2019]—Aerial Insightshttp://www.aerial-insights.co/blog/normativa-drones-espana/Disposición 15721 del BOE núm. 316 de 2017 - BOE.eshttps://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2017/12/29/pdfs/BOE-A-2017-15721.pdfVelasco-Carrau, J., García-Nieto, S., Salcedo, J. V., & Bishop, R. H. (2016). Multi-Objective Optimization for Wind Estimation and Aircraft Model Identification. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39(2), 372-389. doi:10.2514/1.g001294Vanegas, G., Samaniego, F., Girbes, V., Armesto, L., & Garcia-Nieto, S. (2018). Smooth 3D path planning for non-holonomic UAVs. 2018 7th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC). doi:10.1109/icosc.2018.8587835Samaniego, F., Sanchis, J., Garcia-Nieto, S., & Simarro, R. (2018). Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Path Planning Methods Constrained by the Maneuverability of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. 2018 7th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC). doi:10.1109/icosc.2018.858781

A Path Planning Algorithm for a Dynamic Environment Based on Proper Generalized Decomposition

[EN] A necessity in the design of a path planning algorithm is to account for the environment. If the movement of the mobile robot is through a dynamic environment, the algorithm needs to include the main constraint: real-time collision avoidance. This kind of problem has been studied by different researchers suggesting different techniques to solve the problem of how to design a trajectory of a mobile robot avoiding collisions with dynamic obstacles. One of these algorithms is the artificial potential field (APF), proposed by O. Khatib in 1986, where a set of an artificial potential field is generated to attract the mobile robot to the goal and to repel the obstacles. This is one of the best options to obtain the trajectory of a mobile robot in real-time (RT). However, the main disadvantage is the presence of deadlocks. The mobile robot can be trapped in one of the local minima. In 1988, J.F. Canny suggested an alternative solution using harmonic functions satisfying the Laplace partial differential equation. When this article appeared, it was nearly impossible to apply this algorithm to RT applications. Years later a novel technique called proper generalized decomposition (PGD) appeared to solve partial differential equations, including parameters, the main appeal being that the solution is obtained once in life, including all the possible parameters. Our previous work, published in 2018, was the first approach to study the possibility of applying the PGD to designing a path planning alternative to the algorithms that nowadays exist. The target of this work is to improve our first approach while including dynamic obstacles as extra parameters.This research was funded by the GVA/2019/124 grant from Generalitat Valenciana and by the RTI2018-093521-B-C32 grant from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades.Falcó, A.; Hilario, L.; Montés, N.; Mora, MC.; Nadal, E. (2020). A Path Planning Algorithm for a Dynamic Environment Based on Proper Generalized Decomposition. Mathematics. 8(12):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122245S111812Gonzalez, D., Perez, J., Milanes, V., & Nashashibi, F. (2016). A Review of Motion Planning Techniques for Automated Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(4), 1135-1145. doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2498841Rimon, E., & Koditschek, D. E. (1992). Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8(5), 501-518. doi:10.1109/70.163777Khatib, O. (1986). Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 5(1), 90-98. doi:10.1177/027836498600500106Kim, J.-O., & Khosla, P. K. (1992). Real-time obstacle avoidance using harmonic potential functions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8(3), 338-349. doi:10.1109/70.143352Connolly, C. I., & Grupen, R. A. (1993). The applications of harmonic functions to robotics. Journal of Robotic Systems, 10(7), 931-946. doi:10.1002/rob.4620100704Garrido, S., Moreno, L., Blanco, D., & Martín Monar, F. (2009). Robotic Motion Using Harmonic Functions and Finite Elements. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 59(1), 57-73. doi:10.1007/s10846-009-9381-3Bai, X., Yan, W., Cao, M., & Xue, D. (2019). Distributed multi‐vehicle task assignment in a time‐invariant drift field with obstacles. IET Control Theory & Applications, 13(17), 2886-2893. doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6125Bai, X., Yan, W., Ge, S. S., & Cao, M. (2018). An integrated multi-population genetic algorithm for multi-vehicle task assignment in a drift field. Information Sciences, 453, 227-238. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.04.044Falcó, A., & Nouy, A. (2011). Proper generalized decomposition for nonlinear convex problems in tensor Banach spaces. Numerische Mathematik, 121(3), 503-530. doi:10.1007/s00211-011-0437-5Chinesta, F., Leygue, A., Bordeu, F., Aguado, J. V., Cueto, E., Gonzalez, D., … Huerta, A. (2013). PGD-Based Computational Vademecum for Efficient Design, Optimization and Control. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 20(1), 31-59. doi:10.1007/s11831-013-9080-xFalcó, A., Montés, N., Chinesta, F., Hilario, L., & Mora, M. C. (2018). On the Existence of a Progressive Variational Vademecum based on the Proper Generalized Decomposition for a Class of Elliptic Parameterized Problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 330, 1093-1107. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2017.08.007Domenech, L., Falcó, A., García, V., & Sánchez, F. (2016). Towards a 2.5D geometric model in mold filling simulation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 291, 183-196. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2015.02.043Falcó, A., & Nouy, A. (2011). A Proper Generalized Decomposition for the solution of elliptic problems in abstract form by using a functional Eckart–Young approach. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 376(2), 469-480. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.12.003Falcó, A., & Hackbusch, W. (2012). On Minimal Subspaces in Tensor Representations. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 12(6), 765-803. doi:10.1007/s10208-012-9136-6Canuto, C., & Urban, K. (2005). Adaptive Optimization of Convex Functionals in Banach Spaces. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 42(5), 2043-2075. doi:10.1137/s0036142903429730Ammar, A., Chinesta, F., & Falcó, A. (2010). On the Convergence of a Greedy Rank-One Update Algorithm for a Class of Linear Systems. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 17(4), 473-486. doi:10.1007/s11831-010-9048-

A review of mobile robots: Concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications

[EN] Humanoid robots, unmanned rovers, entertainment pets, drones, and so on are great examples of mobile robots. They can be distinguished from other robots by their ability to move autonomously, with enough intelligence to react and make decisions based on the perception they receive from the environment. Mobile robots must have some source of input data, some way of decoding that input, and a way of taking actions (including its own motion) to respond to a changing world. The need to sense and adapt to an unknown environment requires a powerful cognition system. Nowadays, there are mobile robots that can walk, run, jump, and so on like their biological counterparts. Several fields of robotics have arisen, such as wheeled mobile robots, legged robots, flying robots, robot vision, artificial intelligence, and so on, which involve different technological areas such as mechanics, electronics, and computer science. In this article, the world of mobile robots is explored including the new trends. These new trends are led by artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, network communication, cooperative work, nanorobotics, friendly human-robot interfaces, safe human-robot interaction, and emotion expression and perception. Furthermore, these news trends are applied to different fields such as medicine, health care, sports, ergonomics, industry, distribution of goods, and service robotics. These tendencies will keep going their evolution in the coming years.The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, which has funded the DPI2013-44227-R project.Rubio Montoya, FJ.; Valero Chuliá, FJ.; Llopis Albert, C. (2019). A review of mobile robots: Concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. 16(2):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419839596S122162Brunete, A., Ranganath, A., Segovia, S., de Frutos, J. P., Hernando, M., & Gambao, E. (2017). Current trends in reconfigurable modular robots design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 14(3), 172988141771045. doi:10.1177/1729881417710457Bajracharya, M., Maimone, M. W., & Helmick, D. (2008). Autonomy for Mars Rovers: Past, Present, and Future. Computer, 41(12), 44-50. doi:10.1109/mc.2008.479Carsten, J., Rankin, A., Ferguson, D., & Stentz, A. (2007). Global Path Planning on Board the Mars Exploration Rovers. 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference. doi:10.1109/aero.2007.352683Grotzinger, J. P., Crisp, J., Vasavada, A. R., Anderson, R. C., Baker, C. J., Barry, R., … Wiens, R. C. (2012). Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4), 5-56. doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9892-2Khatib, O., Yeh, X., Brantner, G., Soe, B., Kim, B., Ganguly, S., … Creuze, V. (2016). Ocean One: A Robotic Avatar for Oceanic Discovery. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(4), 20-29. doi:10.1109/mra.2016.2613281Ceccarelli, M. (2012). Notes for a History of Grasping Devices. Mechanisms and Machine Science, 3-16. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4664-3_1Campion, G., & Chung, W. (2008). Wheeled Robots. Springer Handbook of Robotics, 391-410. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_18Ferriere, L., Raucent, B., & Campion, G. (s. f.). Design of omnimobile robot wheels. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.1996.509271Campion, G., Bastin, G., & Dandrea-Novel, B. (1996). Structural properties and classification of kinematic and dynamic models of wheeled mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(1), 47-62. doi:10.1109/70.481750Bałchanowski, J. (2012). Mobile Wheel-Legged Robot: Researching of Suspension Leveling System. Mechanisms and Machine Science, 3-12. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5125-5_1Williams, R. L., Carter, B. E., Gallina, P., & Rosati, G. (2002). Dynamic model with slip for wheeled omnidirectional robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18(3), 285-293. doi:10.1109/tra.2002.1019459Chan, R. P. M., Stol, K. A., & Halkyard, C. R. (2013). Review of modelling and control of two-wheeled robots. Annual Reviews in Control, 37(1), 89-103. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.03.004Kim, H., & Kim, B. K. (2014). Online Minimum-Energy Trajectory Planning and Control on a Straight-Line Path for Three-Wheeled Omnidirectional Mobile Robots. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(9), 4771-4779. doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2293706Carbone, G., & Ceccarelli, M. (2005). Legged Robotic Systems. Cutting Edge Robotics. doi:10.5772/4669Chestnutt, J., Lau, M., Cheung, G., Kuffner, J., Hodgins, J., & Kanade, T. (s. f.). Footstep Planning for the Honda ASIMO Humanoid. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.2005.1570188Arikawa, K., & Hirose, S. (s. f.). Development of quadruped walking robot TITAN-VIII. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS ’96. doi:10.1109/iros.1996.570670Kurazume, R., Byong-won, A., Ohta, K., & Hasegawa, T. (s. f.). Experimental study on energy efficiency for quadruped walking vehicles. Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453). doi:10.1109/iros.2003.1250697Hirose, S., Fukuda, Y., Yoneda, K., Nagakubo, A., Tsukagoshi, H., Arikawa, K., … Hodoshima, R. (2009). Quadruped walking robots at Tokyo Institute of Technology. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 16(2), 104-114. doi:10.1109/mra.2009.932524Stoica, A., Carbone, G., Ceccarelli, M., & Pisla, D. (2010). Cassino Hexapod : Experiences and new leg design. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR). doi:10.1109/aqtr.2010.5520756Bares, J. E., & Wettergreen, D. S. (1999). Dante II: Technical Description, Results, and Lessons Learned. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 18(7), 621-649. doi:10.1177/02783649922066475Schiele, A., Romstedt, J., Lee, C., Henkel, H., Klinkner, S., Bertrand, R., … Michaelis, H. (2008). NanoKhod Exploration Rover - A Rugged Rover Suited for Small, Low-Cost, Planetary Lander Mission. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 15(2), 96-107. doi:10.1109/mra.2008.917888Takayama, T., & Hirose, S. (2003). Development of Souryu I & II -Connected Crawler Vehicle for Inspection of Narrow and Winding Space. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 15(1), 61-69. doi:10.20965/jrm.2003.p0061Cuesta, F., & Ollero, A. (2005). Intelligent Mobile Robot Navigation. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. doi:10.1007/b14079Ohya, I., Kosaka, A., & Kak, A. (1998). Vision-based navigation by a mobile robot with obstacle avoidance using single-camera vision and ultrasonic sensing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(6), 969-978. doi:10.1109/70.736780Desouza, G. N., & Kak, A. C. (2002). Vision for mobile robot navigation: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(2), 237-267. doi:10.1109/34.982903Borenstein, J., Everett, H. R., Feng, L., & Wehe, D. (1997). Mobile robot positioning: Sensors and techniques. Journal of Robotic Systems, 14(4), 231-249. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4563(199704)14:43.0.co;2-rBetke, M., & Gurvits, L. (1997). Mobile robot localization using landmarks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 13(2), 251-263. doi:10.1109/70.563647Kuffner, J., Nishiwaki, K., Kagami, S., Inaba, M., & Inoue, H. (2005). Motion Planning for Humanoid Robots. Robotics Research. The Eleventh International Symposium, 365-374. doi:10.1007/11008941_39Lee, Y.-J., & Bien, Z. (2002). Path planning for a quadruped robot: an artificial field approach. Advanced Robotics, 16(7), 609-627. doi:10.1163/15685530260390746Petres, C., Pailhas, Y., Patron, P., Petillot, Y., Evans, J., & Lane, D. (2007). Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(2), 331-341. doi:10.1109/tro.2007.895057P. Raja. (2012). Optimal path planning of mobile robots: A review. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 7(9). doi:10.5897/ijps11.1745Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968). A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2), 100-107. doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300136Lozano-Pérez, T., & Wesley, M. A. (1979). An algorithm for planning collision-free paths among polyhedral obstacles. Communications of the ACM, 22(10), 560-570. doi:10.1145/359156.359164Lozano-Perez. (1983). Spatial Planning: A Configuration Space Approach. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-32(2), 108-120. doi:10.1109/tc.1983.1676196Brooks, R. A. (1983). Solving the find-path problem by good representation of free space. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13(2), 190-197. doi:10.1109/tsmc.1983.6313112Schwartz, J. T., & Sharir, M. (1983). On the «piano movers» problem. II. General techniques for computing topological properties of real algebraic manifolds. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 4(3), 298-351. doi:10.1016/0196-8858(83)90014-3Kavraki LE. Random networks in configurations space for fast path planning. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1994.Kavraki, L. E., Latombe, J.-C., Motwani, R., & Raghavan, P. (1998). Randomized Query Processing in Robot Path Planning. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 57(1), 50-60. doi:10.1006/jcss.1998.1578Hsu, D., Kindel, R., Latombe, J.-C., & Rock, S. (2002). Randomized Kinodynamic Motion Planning with Moving Obstacles. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 21(3), 233-255. doi:10.1177/027836402320556421Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996). Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(4), 566-580. doi:10.1109/70.508439Rubio, F., Valero, F., Sunyer, J., & Mata, V. (2009). Direct step‐by‐step method for industrial robot path planning. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 36(6), 594-607. doi:10.1108/01439910910994669Howard, T. M., & Kelly, A. (2007). Optimal Rough Terrain Trajectory Generation for Wheeled Mobile Robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 26(2), 141-166. doi:10.1177/0278364906075328Valero FJ. Planificación de trayectorias libres de obstáculos para un manipulador plano. Doctoral Thesis, UPV, Spain, 1990.Valero, F., Mata, V., Cuadrado, J. I., & Ceccarelli, M. (1996). A formulation for path planning of manipulators in complex environments by using adjacent configurations. Advanced Robotics, 11(1), 33-56. doi:10.1163/156855397x00038Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182-197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017Garcia, M. A. P., Montiel, O., Castillo, O., Sepúlveda, R., & Melin, P. (2009). Path planning for autonomous mobile robot navigation with ant colony optimization and fuzzy cost function evaluation. Applied Soft Computing, 9(3), 1102-1110. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.02.014Miao, H., & Tian, Y.-C. (2013). Dynamic robot path planning using an enhanced simulated annealing approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 222, 420-437. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2013.07.022Bobrow, J. E., Dubowsky, S., & Gibson, J. S. (1985). Time-Optimal Control of Robotic Manipulators Along Specified Paths. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 4(3), 3-17. doi:10.1177/027836498500400301Kang Shin, & McKay, N. (1985). Minimum-time control of robotic manipulators with geometric path constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30(6), 531-541. doi:10.1109/tac.1985.1104009Kyriakopoulos, K. J., & Saridis, G. N. (s. f.). Minimum jerk path generation. Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.1988.12075Constantinescu, D., & Croft, E. A. (2000). Smooth and time-optimal trajectory planning for industrial manipulators along specified paths. Journal of Robotic Systems, 17(5), 233-249. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4563(200005)17:53.0.co;2-yGasparetto, A., & Zanotto, V. (2010). Optimal trajectory planning for industrial robots. Advances in Engineering Software, 41(4), 548-556. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.11.001JIANGdagger, Z.-P., & NIJMEIJER, H. (1997). Tracking Control of Mobile Robots: A Case Study in Backstepping**This paper was not presented at any IFAC meeting. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Alberto Isidori under the direction of Editor Tamer Başar. Automatica, 33(7), 1393-1399. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(97)00055-1Klosowski, J. T., Held, M., Mitchell, J. S. B., Sowizral, H., & Zikan, K. (1998). Efficient collision detection using bounding volume hierarchies of k-DOPs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 4(1), 21-36. doi:10.1109/2945.675649Mirtich B. V-Clip: fast and robust polyhedral collision detection. Technical Report TR97-05, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory, 1997.Mohamed, E. F., El-Metwally, K., & Hanafy, A. R. (2011). An improved Tangent Bug method integrated with artificial potential field for multi-robot path planning. 2011 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications. doi:10.1109/inista.2011.5946136Seder, M., & Petrovic, I. (2007). Dynamic window based approach to mobile robot motion control in the presence of moving obstacles. Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.2007.363613Simmons, R. (s. f.). The curvature-velocity method for local obstacle avoidance. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.1996.51102

Smooth 3D Path Planning by Means of Multiobjective Optimization for Fixed-Wing UAVs

[EN] Demand for 3D planning and guidance algorithms is increasing due, in part, to the increase in unmanned vehicle-based applications. Traditionally, two-dimensional (2D) trajectory planning algorithms address the problem by using the approach of maintaining a constant altitude. Addressing the problem of path planning in a three-dimensional (3D) space implies more complex scenarios where maintaining altitude is not a valid approach. The work presented here implements an architecture for the generation of 3D flight paths for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The aim is to determine the feasible flight path by minimizing the turning effort, starting from a set of control points in 3D space, including the initial and final point. The trajectory generated takes into account the rotation and elevation constraints of the UAV. From the defined control points and the movement constraints of the UAV, a path is generated that combines the union of the control points by means of a set of rectilinear segments and spherical curves. However, this design methodology means that the problem does not have a single solution; in other words, there are infinite solutions for the generation of the final path. For this reason, a multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) is proposed with the aim of independently maximizing each of the turning radii of the path. Finally, to produce a complete results visualization of the MOP and the final 3D trajectory, the architecture was implemented in a simulation with Matlab/Simulink/flightGear.The authors would like to acknowledge the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades for providing funding through the project RTI2018-096904-B-I00 and the local administration Generalitat Valenciana through projects GV/2017/029 and AICO/2019/055. Franklin Samaniego thanks IFTH (Instituto de Fomento al Talento Humano) Ecuador (2015-AR2Q9209), for its sponsorship of this work.Samaniego, F.; Sanchís Saez, J.; Garcia-Nieto, S.; Simarro Fernández, R. (2020). Smooth 3D Path Planning by Means of Multiobjective Optimization for Fixed-Wing UAVs. Electronics. 9(1):1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010051S12391Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127-140. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014Münzer, S., Zimmer, H. D., Schwalm, M., Baus, J., & Aslan, I. (2006). Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 300-308. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.08.001Morales, Y., Kallakuri, N., Shinozawa, K., Miyashita, T., & Hagita, N. (2013). Human-comfortable navigation for an autonomous robotic wheelchair. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696743Krotkov, E., & Hebert, M. (s. f.). Mapping and positioning for a prototype lunar rover. Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/robot.1995.525697Rodriguez-Seda, E. J. (2014). Decentralized trajectory tracking with collision avoidance control for teams of unmanned vehicles with constant speed. 2014 American Control Conference. doi:10.1109/acc.2014.6859184Xiaoping Ren, & Zixing Cai. (2010). Kinematics model of unmanned driving vehicle. 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. doi:10.1109/wcica.2010.5554512Jun, J.-Y., Saut, J.-P., & Benamar, F. (2016). Pose estimation-based path planning for a tracked mobile robot traversing uneven terrains. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 325-339. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2015.09.014Li, Y., Ding, L., & Liu, G. (2016). Attitude-based dynamic and kinematic models for wheels of mobile robot on deformable slope. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 161-175. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.006Mekonnen, G., Kumar, S., & Pathak, P. M. (2016). Wireless hybrid visual servoing of omnidirectional wheeled mobile robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 450-462. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2015.08.008Xu, J., Wang, M., & Qiao, L. (2015). Dynamical sliding mode control for the trajectory tracking of underactuated unmanned underwater vehicles. Ocean Engineering, 105, 54-63. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.022Gafurov, S. A., & Klochkov, E. V. (2015). Autonomous Unmanned Underwater Vehicles Development Tendencies. Procedia Engineering, 106, 141-148. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.017Qi, X., & Cai, Z. (2018). Three-dimensional formation control based on nonlinear small gain method for multiple underactuated underwater vehicles. Ocean Engineering, 151, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.032Ramasamy, S., Sabatini, R., Gardi, A., & Liu, J. (2016). LIDAR obstacle warning and avoidance system for unmanned aerial vehicle sense-and-avoid. Aerospace Science and Technology, 55, 344-358. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2016.05.020Zhu, L., Cheng, X., & Yuan, F.-G. (2016). A 3D collision avoidance strategy for UAV with physical constraints. Measurement, 77, 40-49. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.006Chee, K. Y., & Zhong, Z. W. (2013). Control, navigation and collision avoidance for an unmanned aerial vehicle. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 190, 66-76. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2012.11.017Courbon, J., Mezouar, Y., Guénard, N., & Martinet, P. (2010). Vision-based navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles. Control Engineering Practice, 18(7), 789-799. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2010.03.004Aguilar, W., & Morales, S. (2016). 3D Environment Mapping Using the Kinect V2 and Path Planning Based on RRT Algorithms. Electronics, 5(4), 70. doi:10.3390/electronics5040070Yan, F., Liu, Y.-S., & Xiao, J.-Z. (2013). Path Planning in Complex 3D Environments Using a Probabilistic Roadmap Method. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 10(6), 525-533. doi:10.1007/s11633-013-0750-9Yeh, H.-Y., Thomas, S., Eppstein, D., & Amato, N. M. (2012). UOBPRM: A uniformly distributed obstacle-based PRM. 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385875Liang, Y., & Xu, L. (2009). Global path planning for mobile robot based genetic algorithm and modified simulated annealing algorithm. Proceedings of the first ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GEC ’09. doi:10.1145/1543834.1543875Liu, J., Yang, J., Liu, H., Tian, X., & Gao, M. (2016). An improved ant colony algorithm for robot path planning. Soft Computing, 21(19), 5829-5839. doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2161-7Cao, H., Sun, S., Zhang, K., & Tang, Z. (2016). Visualized trajectory planning of flexible redundant robotic arm using a novel hybrid algorithm. Optik, 127(20), 9974-9983. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.07.078Duan, H., & Qiao, P. (2014). Pigeon-inspired optimization: a new swarm intelligence optimizer for air robot path planning. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 7(1), 24-37. doi:10.1108/ijicc-02-2014-0005Pandey, A., & Parhi, D. R. (2017). Optimum path planning of mobile robot in unknown static and dynamic environments using Fuzzy-Wind Driven Optimization algorithm. Defence Technology, 13(1), 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.dt.2017.01.001Samaniego, F., Sanchis, J., García-Nieto, S., & Simarro, R. (2019). Recursive Rewarding Modified Adaptive Cell Decomposition (RR-MACD): A Dynamic Path Planning Algorithm for UAVs. Electronics, 8(3), 306. doi:10.3390/electronics8030306Dubins, L. E. (1957). On Curves of Minimal Length with a Constraint on Average Curvature, and with Prescribed Initial and Terminal Positions and Tangents. American Journal of Mathematics, 79(3), 497. doi:10.2307/2372560Fleury, S., Soueres, P., Laumond, J.-P., & Chatila, R. (1995). Primitives for smoothing mobile robot trajectories. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 11(3), 441-448. doi:10.1109/70.388788Vanegas, G., Samaniego, F., Girbes, V., Armesto, L., & Garcia-Nieto, S. (2018). Smooth 3D path planning for non-holonomic UAVs. 2018 7th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC). doi:10.1109/icosc.2018.8587835Brezak, M., & Petrovic, I. (2014). Real-time Approximation of Clothoids With Bounded Error for Path Planning Applications. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 30(2), 507-515. doi:10.1109/tro.2013.2283928Barsky, B. A., & DeRose, T. D. (1989). Geometric continuity of parametric curves: three equivalent characterizations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 9(6), 60-69. doi:10.1109/38.41470Kim, H., Kim, D., Shin, J.-U., Kim, H., & Myung, H. (2014). Angular rate-constrained path planning algorithm for unmanned surface vehicles. Ocean Engineering, 84, 37-44. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.034Isaacs, J., & Hespanha, J. (2013). Dubins Traveling Salesman Problem with Neighborhoods: A Graph-Based Approach. Algorithms, 6(1), 84-99. doi:10.3390/a6010084Masehian, E., & Kakahaji, H. (2014). NRR: a nonholonomic random replanner for navigation of car-like robots in unknown environments. Robotica, 32(7), 1101-1123. doi:10.1017/s0263574713001276Fraichard, T., & Scheuer, A. (2004). From Reeds and Shepp’s to Continuous-Curvature Paths. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 20(6), 1025-1035. doi:10.1109/tro.2004.833789Pepy, R., Lambert, A., & Mounier, H. (s. f.). Path Planning using a Dynamic Vehicle Model. 2006 2nd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies. doi:10.1109/ictta.2006.1684472Girbés, V., Vanegas, G., & Armesto, L. (2019). Clothoid-Based Three-Dimensional Curve for Attitude Planning. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(8), 1886-1898. doi:10.2514/1.g003551De Lorenzis, L., Wriggers, P., & Hughes, T. J. R. (2014). Isogeometric contact: a review. GAMM-Mitteilungen, 37(1), 85-123. doi:10.1002/gamm.201410005Pigounakis, K. G., Sapidis, N. S., & Kaklis, P. D. (1996). Fairing Spatial B-Spline Curves. Journal of Ship Research, 40(04), 351-367. doi:10.5957/jsr.1996.40.4.351Pérez, L. H., Aguilar, M. C. M., Sánchez, N. M., & Montesinos, A. F. (2018). Path Planning Based on Parametric Curves. Advanced Path Planning for Mobile Entities. doi:10.5772/intechopen.72574Huh, U.-Y., & Chang, S.-R. (2014). A G2 Continuous Path-smoothing Algorithm Using Modified Quadratic Polynomial Interpolation. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 11(2), 25. doi:10.5772/57340Chang, S.-R., & Huh, U.-Y. (2014). A Collision-Free G2 Continuous Path-Smoothing Algorithm Using Quadratic Polynomial Interpolation. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 11(12), 194. doi:10.5772/59463Yaochu Jin, & Sendhoff, B. (2008). Pareto-Based Multiobjective Machine Learning: An Overview and Case Studies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 38(3), 397-415. doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2008.919172Velasco-Carrau, J., García-Nieto, S., Salcedo, J. V., & Bishop, R. H. (2016). Multi-Objective Optimization for Wind Estimation and Aircraft Model Identification. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39(2), 372-389. doi:10.2514/1.g001294Honig, E., Schucking, E. L., & Vishveshwara, C. V. (1974). Motion of charged particles in homogeneous electromagnetic fields. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 15(6), 774-781. doi:10.1063/1.1666728Iyer, B. R., & Vishveshwara, C. V. (1988). The Frenet-Serret formalism and black holes in higher dimensions. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 5(7), 961-970. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/5/7/005Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Deb, K., & Zitzler, E. (2002). Combining Convergence and Diversity in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 10(3), 263-282. doi:10.1162/106365602760234108Blasco, X., Herrero, J. M., Sanchis, J., & Martínez, M. (2008). A new graphical visualization of n-dimensional Pareto front for decision-making in multiobjective optimization. Information Sciences, 178(20), 3908-3924. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.01

Genetic Algorithm-based Robot Path Planning

Nowadays, building an intelligent robot that able to move by itself from one location to another without collides with other obstacles is of interest in many applications. In the real world, condition of an environment is always unpredictable and changes with the existence of dynamic obstacles. This paper tends to propose an algorithm for robot path planning in a dynamic environment using Genetic algorithm (GA) technique. The proposed algorithm is able to find an optimum path for a robot and avoid any static and dynamic obstacles. The variation of the proposed algorithm is shown with the implementation of the algorithm in 4-way movement robot and 8-way movement robot. The simulation results show significant performance of the algorithm when compared with real optimum path

A Hierarchal Planning Framework for AUV Mission Management in a Spatio-Temporal Varying Ocean

The purpose of this paper is to provide a hierarchical dynamic mission planning framework for a single autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) to accomplish task-assign process in a limited time interval while operating in an uncertain undersea environment, where spatio-temporal variability of the operating field is taken into account. To this end, a high level reactive mission planner and a low level motion planning system are constructed. The high level system is responsible for task priority assignment and guiding the vehicle toward a target of interest considering on-time termination of the mission. The lower layer is in charge of generating optimal trajectories based on sequence of tasks and dynamicity of operating terrain. The mission planner is able to reactively re-arrange the tasks based on mission/terrain updates while the low level planner is capable of coping unexpected changes of the terrain by correcting the old path and re-generating a new trajectory. As a result, the vehicle is able to undertake the maximum number of tasks with certain degree of maneuverability having situational awareness of the operating field. The computational engine of the mentioned framework is based on the biogeography based optimization (BBO) algorithm that is capable of providing efficient solutions. To evaluate the performance of the proposed framework, firstly, a realistic model of undersea environment is provided based on realistic map data, and then several scenarios, treated as real experiments, are designed through the simulation study. Additionally, to show the robustness and reliability of the framework, Monte-Carlo simulation is carried out and statistical analysis is performed. The results of simulations indicate the significant potential of the two-level hierarchical mission planning system in mission success and its applicability for real-time implementation