Robust Cardiac Motion Estimation using Ultrafast Ultrasound Data: A Low-Rank-Topology-Preserving Approach

Cardiac motion estimation is an important diagnostic tool to detect heart diseases and it has been explored with modalities such as MRI and conventional ultrasound (US) sequences. US cardiac motion estimation still presents challenges because of the complex motion patterns and the presence of noise. In this work, we propose a novel approach to estimate the cardiac motion using ultrafast ultrasound data. -- Our solution is based on a variational formulation characterized by the L2-regularized class. The displacement is represented by a lattice of b-splines and we ensure robustness by applying a maximum likelihood type estimator. While this is an important part of our solution, the main highlight of this paper is to combine a low-rank data representation with topology preservation. Low-rank data representation (achieved by finding the k-dominant singular values of a Casorati Matrix arranged from the data sequence) speeds up the global solution and achieves noise reduction. On the other hand, topology preservation (achieved by monitoring the Jacobian determinant) allows to radically rule out distortions while carefully controlling the size of allowed expansions and contractions. Our variational approach is carried out on a realistic dataset as well as on a simulated one. We demonstrate how our proposed variational solution deals with complex deformations through careful numerical experiments. While maintaining the accuracy of the solution, the low-rank preprocessing is shown to speed up the convergence of the variational problem. Beyond cardiac motion estimation, our approach is promising for the analysis of other organs that experience motion.Comment: 15 pages, 10 figures, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 201

State of the Art of Level Set Methods in Segmentation and Registration of Medical Imaging Modalities

Segmentation of medical images is an important step in various applications such as visualization, quantitative analysis and image-guided surgery. Numerous segmentation methods have been developed in the past two decades for extraction of organ contours on medical images. Low-level segmentation methods, such as pixel-based clustering, region growing, and filter-based edge detection, require additional pre-processing and post-processing as well as considerable amounts of expert intervention or information of the objects of interest. Furthermore the subsequent analysis of segmented objects is hampered by the primitive, pixel or voxel level representations from those region-based segmentation. Deformable models, on the other hand, provide an explicit representation of the boundary and the shape of the object. They combine several desirable features such as inherent connectivity and smoothness, which counteract noise and boundary irregularities, as well as the ability to incorporate knowledge about the object of interest. However, parametric deformable models have two main limitations. First, in situations where the initial model and desired object boundary differ greatly in size and shape, the model must be re-parameterized dynamically to faithfully recover the object boundary. The second limitation is that it has difficulty dealing with topological adaptation such as splitting or merging model parts, a useful property for recovering either multiple objects or objects with unknown topology. This difficulty is caused by the fact that a new parameterization must be constructed whenever topology change occurs, which requires sophisticated schemes. Level set deformable models, also referred to as geometric deformable models, provide an elegant solution to address the primary limitations of parametric deformable models. These methods have drawn a great deal of attention since their introduction in 1988. Advantages of the contour implicit formulation of the deformable model over parametric formulation include: (1) no parameterization of the contour, (2) topological flexibility, (3) good numerical stability, (4) straightforward extension of the 2D formulation to n-D. Recent reviews on the subject include papers from Suri. In this chapter we give a general overview of the level set segmentation methods with emphasize on new frameworks recently introduced in the context of medical imaging problems. We then introduce novel approaches that aim at combining segmentation and registration in a level set formulation. Finally we review a selective set of clinical works with detailed validation of the level set methods for several clinical applications

Multi-modality cardiac image computing: a survey

Multi-modality cardiac imaging plays a key role in the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. It allows a combination of complementary anatomical, morphological and functional information, increases diagnosis accuracy, and improves the efficacy of cardiovascular interventions and clinical outcomes. Fully-automated processing and quantitative analysis of multi-modality cardiac images could have a direct impact on clinical research and evidence-based patient management. However, these require overcoming significant challenges including inter-modality misalignment and finding optimal methods to integrate information from different modalities. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of multi-modality imaging in cardiology, the computing methods, the validation strategies, the related clinical workflows and future perspectives. For the computing methodologies, we have a favored focus on the three tasks, i.e., registration, fusion and segmentation, which generally involve multi-modality imaging data, either combining information from different modalities or transferring information across modalities. The review highlights that multi-modality cardiac imaging data has the potential of wide applicability in the clinic, such as trans-aortic valve implantation guidance, myocardial viability assessment, and catheter ablation therapy and its patient selection. Nevertheless, many challenges remain unsolved, such as missing modality, modality selection, combination of imaging and non-imaging data, and uniform analysis and representation of different modalities. There is also work to do in defining how the well-developed techniques fit in clinical workflows and how much additional and relevant information they introduce. These problems are likely to continue to be an active field of research and the questions to be answered in the future