Quicksort Revisited: Verifying Alternative Versions of Quicksort

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016.We verify the correctness of a recursive version of Tony Hoare’s quicksort algorithm using the Hoare-logic based verification tool Dafny. We then develop a non-standard, iterative version which is based on a stack of pivot-locations rather than the standard stack of ranges. We outline an incomplete Dafny proof for the latter

On the tails of the limiting Quicksort distribution

We give asymptotics for the left and right tails of the limiting Quicksort distribution. The results agree with, but are less precise than, earlier non-rigorous results by Knessl and Spankowski.Comment: 8 pages. v2: Typos corrected and some formulations improve

A characterization of the set of fixed points of the Quicksort transformation

The limiting distribution \mu of the normalized number of key comparisons required by the Quicksort sorting algorithm is known to be the unique fixed point of a certain distributional transformation T -- unique, that is, subject to the constraints of zero mean and finite variance. We show that a distribution is a fixed point of T if and only if it is the convolution of \mu with a Cauchy distribution of arbitrary center and scale. In particular, therefore, \mu is the unique fixed point of T having zero mean.Comment: 9 pages. See also http://www.mts.jhu.edu/~fill/ and http://www.math.uu.se/~svante/papers . Submitted for publication in May,200

Distributional convergence for the number of symbol comparisons used by QuickSort

Most previous studies of the sorting algorithm QuickSort have used the number of key comparisons as a measure of the cost of executing the algorithm. Here we suppose that the n independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) keys are each represented as a sequence of symbols from a probabilistic source and that QuickSort operates on individual symbols, and we measure the execution cost as the number of symbol comparisons. Assuming only a mild "tameness" condition on the source, we show that there is a limiting distribution for the number of symbol comparisons after normalization: first centering by the mean and then dividing by n. Additionally, under a condition that grows more restrictive as p increases, we have convergence of moments of orders p and smaller. In particular, we have convergence in distribution and convergence of moments of every order whenever the source is memoryless, that is, whenever each key is generated as an infinite string of i.i.d. symbols. This is somewhat surprising; even for the classical model that each key is an i.i.d. string of unbiased ("fair") bits, the mean exhibits periodic fluctuations of order n.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/12-AAP866 the Annals of Applied Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aap/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org