218 research outputs found
Query-to-Communication Lifting for BPP
For any -bit boolean function , we show that the randomized
communication complexity of the composed function , where is an
index gadget, is characterized by the randomized decision tree complexity of
. In particular, this means that many query complexity separations involving
randomized models (e.g., classical vs. quantum) automatically imply analogous
separations in communication complexity.Comment: 21 page
Proofs of Proximity for Distribution Testing
Distribution testing is an area of property testing that studies algorithms that receive few samples from a probability distribution D and decide whether D has a certain property or is far (in total variation distance) from all distributions with that property. Most natural properties of distributions, however, require a large number of samples to test, which motivates the question of whether there are natural settings wherein fewer samples suffice.
We initiate a study of proofs of proximity for properties of distributions. In their basic form, these proof systems consist of a tester that not only has sample access to a distribution but also explicit access to a proof string that depends on the distribution. We refer to these as NP distribution testers, or MA distribution testers if the tester is a probabilistic algorithm. We also study the more general notion of IP distribution testers, in which the tester interacts with an all-powerful untrusted prover.
We investigate the power and limitations of proofs of proximity for distributions and chart a landscape that, surprisingly, is significantly different from that of proofs of proximity for functions. Our main results include showing that MA distribution testers can be quadratically stronger than standard distribution testers, but no stronger than that; in contrast, IP distribution testers can be exponentially stronger than standard distribution testers, but when restricted to public coins they can be at best quadratically stronger
Equality Alone Does not Simulate Randomness
The canonical problem that gives an exponential separation between deterministic and randomized communication complexity in the classical two-party communication model is "Equality". In this work we show that even allowing access to an "Equality" oracle, deterministic protocols remain exponentially weaker than randomized ones. More precisely, we exhibit a total function on n bits with randomized one-sided communication complexity O(log n), but such that every deterministic protocol with access to "Equality" oracle needs Omega(n) cost to compute it.
Additionally we exhibit a natural and strict infinite hierarchy within BPP, starting with the class P^{EQ} at its bottom
On the Pseudo-Deterministic Query Complexity of NP Search Problems
We study pseudo-deterministic query complexity - randomized query algorithms that are required to output the same answer with high probability on all inputs. We prove Ω(√n) lower bounds on the pseudo-deterministic complexity of a large family of search problems based on unsatisfiable random CNF instances, and also for the promise problem (FIND1) of finding a 1 in a vector populated with at least half one’s. This gives an exponential separation between randomized query complexity and pseudo-deterministic complexity, which is tight in the quantum setting. As applications we partially solve a related combinatorial coloring problem, and we separate random tree-like Resolution from its pseudo-deterministic version. In contrast to our lower bound, we show, surprisingly, that in the zero-error, average case setting, the three notions (deterministic, randomized, pseudo-deterministic) collapse
Structure in Communication Complexity and Constant-Cost Complexity Classes
Several theorems and conjectures in communication complexity state or
speculate that the complexity of a matrix in a given communication model is
controlled by a related analytic or algebraic matrix parameter, e.g., rank,
sign-rank, discrepancy, etc. The forward direction is typically easy as the
structural implications of small complexity often imply a bound on some matrix
parameter. The challenge lies in establishing the reverse direction, which
requires understanding the structure of Boolean matrices for which a given
matrix parameter is small or large. We will discuss several research directions
that align with this overarching theme.Comment: This is a column to be published in the complexity theory column of
SIGACT New
- …