4,989 research outputs found
Quantum interactive proofs with short messages
This paper considers three variants of quantum interactive proof systems in
which short (meaning logarithmic-length) messages are exchanged between the
prover and verifier. The first variant is one in which the verifier sends a
short message to the prover, and the prover responds with an ordinary, or
polynomial-length, message; the second variant is one in which any number of
messages can be exchanged, but where the combined length of all the messages is
logarithmic; and the third variant is one in which the verifier sends
polynomially many random bits to the prover, who responds with a short quantum
message. We prove that in all of these cases the short messages can be
eliminated without changing the power of the model, so the first variant has
the expressive power of QMA and the second and third variants have the
expressive power of BQP. These facts are proved through the use of quantum
state tomography, along with the finite quantum de Finetti theorem for the
first variant.Comment: 15 pages, published versio
On quantum interactive proofs with short messages
This paper proves one of the open problem posed by Beigi et al. in
arXiv:1004.0411v2. We consider quantum interactive proof systems where in the
beginning the verifier and prover send messages to each other with the combined
length of all messages being at most logarithmic (in the input length); and at
the end the prover sends a polynomial-length message to the verifier. We show
that this class has the same expressive power as QMA.Comment: 9 pages, 3 figure
Distributed Quantum Interactive Proofs
The study of distributed interactive proofs was initiated by Kol, Oshman, and Saxena [PODC 2018] as a generalization of distributed decision mechanisms (proof-labeling schemes, etc.), and has received a lot of attention in recent years. In distributed interactive proofs, the nodes of an n-node network G can exchange short messages (called certificates) with a powerful prover. The goal is to decide if the input (including G itself) belongs to some language, with as few turns of interaction and as few bits exchanged between nodes and the prover as possible. There are several results showing that the size of certificates can be reduced drastically with a constant number of interactions compared to non-interactive distributed proofs.
In this paper, we introduce the quantum counterpart of distributed interactive proofs: certificates can now be quantum bits, and the nodes of the network can perform quantum computation. The first result of this paper shows that by using distributed quantum interactive proofs, the number of interactions can be significantly reduced. More precisely, our result shows that for any constant k, the class of languages that can be decided by a k-turn classical (i.e., non-quantum) distributed interactive protocol with f(n)-bit certificate size is contained in the class of languages that can be decided by a 5-turn distributed quantum interactive protocol with O(f(n))-bit certificate size. We also show that if we allow to use shared randomness, the number of turns can be reduced to three. Since no similar turn-reduction classical technique is currently known, our result gives evidence of the power of quantum computation in the setting of distributed interactive proofs as well.
As a corollary of our results, we show that there exist 5-turn/3-turn distributed quantum interactive protocols with small certificate size for problems that have been considered in prior works on distributed interactive proofs such as [Kol, Oshman, and Saxena PODC 2018, Naor, Parter, and Yogev SODA 2020].
We then utilize the framework of the distributed quantum interactive proofs to test closeness of two quantum states each of which is distributed over the entire network
Distributed Quantum Interactive Proofs
The study of distributed interactive proofs was initiated by Kol, Oshman, and
Saxena [PODC 2018] as a generalization of distributed decision mechanisms
(proof-labeling schemes, etc.), and has received a lot of attention in recent
years. In distributed interactive proofs, the nodes of an -node network
can exchange short messages (called certificates) with a powerful prover. The
goal is to decide if the input (including itself) belongs to some language,
with as few turns of interaction and as few bits exchanged between nodes and
the prover as possible. There are several results showing that the size of
certificates can be reduced drastically with a constant number of interactions
compared to non-interactive distributed proofs. In this paper, we introduce the
quantum counterpart of distributed interactive proofs: certificates can now be
quantum bits, and the nodes of the network can perform quantum computation. The
first result of this paper shows that by using quantum distributed interactive
proofs, the number of interactions can be significantly reduced. More
precisely, our result shows that for any constant~, the class of languages
that can be decided by a -turn classical (i.e., non-quantum) distributed
interactive protocol with -bit certificate size is contained in the class
of languages that can be decided by a -turn distributed quantum interactive
protocol with -bit certificate size. We also show that if we allow to
use shared randomness, the number of turns can be reduced to 3-turn. Since no
similar turn-reduction \emph{classical} technique is currently known, our
result gives evidence of the power of quantum computation in the setting of
distributed interactive proofs as well.Comment: 25 page
Brief Announcement: Distributed Quantum Interactive Proofs
The study of distributed interactive proofs was initiated by Kol, Oshman, and Saxena [PODC 2018] as a generalization of distributed decision mechanisms (proof-labeling schemes, etc.), and has received a lot of attention in recent years. In distributed interactive proofs, the nodes of an n-node network G can exchange short messages (called certificates) with a powerful prover. The goal is to decide if the input (including G itself) belongs to some language, with as few turns of interaction and as few bits exchanged between nodes and the prover as possible. There are several results showing that the size of certificates can be reduced drastically with a constant number of interactions compared to non-interactive distributed proofs.
In this brief announcement, we introduce the quantum counterpart of distributed interactive proofs: certificates can now be quantum bits, and the nodes of the network can perform quantum computation. The main result of this paper shows that by using quantum distributed interactive proofs, the number of interactions can be significantly reduced. More precisely, our main result shows that for any constant k, the class of languages that can be decided by a k-turn classical (i.e., non-quantum) distributed interactive protocol with f(n)-bit certificate size is contained in the class of languages that can be decided by a 5-turn distributed quantum interactive protocol with O(f(n))-bit certificate size. We also show that if we allow to use shared randomness, the number of turns can be reduced to 3-turn. Since no similar turn-reduction classical technique is currently known, our result gives evidence of the power of quantum computation in the setting of distributed interactive proofs as well
Quantum Proofs
Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion
of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a
quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as
QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a
certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum
computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a
superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer
computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof
system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that
exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information
during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum
complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum
analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit
some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct
and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of
complexity classes based on variants of this model.
In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning
quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of
the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive
proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof
systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum
interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and
multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*,
and MIP*.Comment: Survey published by NOW publisher
Stronger Methods of Making Quantum Interactive Proofs Perfectly Complete
This paper presents stronger methods of achieving perfect completeness in
quantum interactive proofs. First, it is proved that any problem in QMA has a
two-message quantum interactive proof system of perfect completeness with
constant soundness error, where the verifier has only to send a constant number
of halves of EPR pairs. This in particular implies that the class QMA is
necessarily included by the class QIP_1(2) of problems having two-message
quantum interactive proofs of perfect completeness, which gives the first
nontrivial upper bound for QMA in terms of quantum interactive proofs. It is
also proved that any problem having an -message quantum interactive proof
system necessarily has an -message quantum interactive proof system of
perfect completeness. This improves the previous result due to Kitaev and
Watrous, where the resulting system of perfect completeness requires
messages if not using the parallelization result.Comment: 41 pages; v2: soundness parameters improved, correction of a minor
error in Lemma 23, and removal of the sentences claiming that our techniques
are quantumly nonrelativizin
Quantum interactive proofs and the complexity of separability testing
We identify a formal connection between physical problems related to the
detection of separable (unentangled) quantum states and complexity classes in
theoretical computer science. In particular, we show that to nearly every
quantum interactive proof complexity class (including BQP, QMA, QMA(2), and
QSZK), there corresponds a natural separability testing problem that is
complete for that class. Of particular interest is the fact that the problem of
determining whether an isometry can be made to produce a separable state is
either QMA-complete or QMA(2)-complete, depending upon whether the distance
between quantum states is measured by the one-way LOCC norm or the trace norm.
We obtain strong hardness results by proving that for each n-qubit maximally
entangled state there exists a fixed one-way LOCC measurement that
distinguishes it from any separable state with error probability that decays
exponentially in n.Comment: v2: 43 pages, 5 figures, completely rewritten and in Theory of
Computing (ToC) journal forma
Increasing the power of the verifier in Quantum Zero Knowledge
In quantum zero knowledge, the assumption was made that the verifier is only
using unitary operations. Under this assumption, many nice properties have been
shown about quantum zero knowledge, including the fact that Honest-Verifier
Quantum Statistical Zero Knowledge (HVQSZK) is equal to Cheating-Verifier
Quantum Statistical Zero Knowledge (QSZK) (see [Wat02,Wat06]).
In this paper, we study what happens when we allow an honest verifier to flip
some coins in addition to using unitary operations. Flipping a coin is a
non-unitary operation but doesn't seem at first to enhance the cheating
possibilities of the verifier since a classical honest verifier can flip coins.
In this setting, we show an unexpected result: any classical Interactive Proof
has an Honest-Verifier Quantum Statistical Zero Knowledge proof with coins.
Note that in the classical case, honest verifier SZK is no more powerful than
SZK and hence it is not believed to contain even NP. On the other hand, in the
case of cheating verifiers, we show that Quantum Statistical Zero Knowledge
where the verifier applies any non-unitary operation is equal to Quantum
Zero-Knowledge where the verifier uses only unitaries.
One can think of our results in two complementary ways. If we would like to
use the honest verifier model as a means to study the general model by taking
advantage of their equivalence, then it is imperative to use the unitary
definition without coins, since with the general one this equivalence is most
probably not true. On the other hand, if we would like to use quantum zero
knowledge protocols in a cryptographic scenario where the honest-but-curious
model is sufficient, then adding the unitary constraint severely decreases the
power of quantum zero knowledge protocols.Comment: 17 pages, 0 figures, to appear in FSTTCS'0
Quantum Interactive Proofs with Competing Provers
This paper studies quantum refereed games, which are quantum interactive
proof systems with two competing provers: one that tries to convince the
verifier to accept and the other that tries to convince the verifier to reject.
We prove that every language having an ordinary quantum interactive proof
system also has a quantum refereed game in which the verifier exchanges just
one round of messages with each prover. A key part of our proof is the fact
that there exists a single quantum measurement that reliably distinguishes
between mixed states chosen arbitrarily from disjoint convex sets having large
minimal trace distance from one another. We also show how to reduce the
probability of error for some classes of quantum refereed games.Comment: 13 pages, to appear in STACS 200
- …