340,144 research outputs found
Model checking Quantitative Linear Time Logic
This paper considers QLtl, a quantitative analagon of Ltl and presents algorithms for model checking QLtl over quantitative versions of Kripke structures and Markov chains
Model Checking Probabilistic Pushdown Automata
We consider the model checking problem for probabilistic pushdown automata
(pPDA) and properties expressible in various probabilistic logics. We start
with properties that can be formulated as instances of a generalized random
walk problem. We prove that both qualitative and quantitative model checking
for this class of properties and pPDA is decidable. Then we show that model
checking for the qualitative fragment of the logic PCTL and pPDA is also
decidable. Moreover, we develop an error-tolerant model checking algorithm for
PCTL and the subclass of stateless pPDA. Finally, we consider the class of
omega-regular properties and show that both qualitative and quantitative model
checking for pPDA is decidable
Model Checking the Quantitative mu-Calculus on Linear Hybrid Systems
We study the model-checking problem for a quantitative extension of the modal
mu-calculus on a class of hybrid systems. Qualitative model checking has been
proved decidable and implemented for several classes of systems, but this is
not the case for quantitative questions that arise naturally in this context.
Recently, quantitative formalisms that subsume classical temporal logics and
allow the measurement of interesting quantitative phenomena were introduced. We
show how a powerful quantitative logic, the quantitative mu-calculus, can be
model checked with arbitrary precision on initialised linear hybrid systems. To
this end, we develop new techniques for the discretisation of continuous state
spaces based on a special class of strategies in model-checking games and
present a reduction to a class of counter parity games.Comment: LMCS submissio
Model Checking Games for the Quantitative mu-Calculus
We investigate quantitative extensions of modal logic and the modal
mu-calculus, and study the question whether the tight connection between logic
and games can be lifted from the qualitative logics to their quantitative
counterparts. It turns out that, if the quantitative mu-calculus is defined in
an appropriate way respecting the duality properties between the logical
operators, then its model checking problem can indeed be characterised by a
quantitative variant of parity games. However, these quantitative games have
quite different properties than their classical counterparts, in particular
they are, in general, not positionally determined. The correspondence between
the logic and the games goes both ways: the value of a formula on a
quantitative transition system coincides with the value of the associated
quantitative game, and conversely, the values of quantitative parity games are
definable in the quantitative mu-calculus
Model-checking Quantitative Alternating-time Temporal Logic on One-counter Game Models
We consider quantitative extensions of the alternating-time temporal logics
ATL/ATLs called quantitative alternating-time temporal logics (QATL/QATLs) in
which the value of a counter can be compared to constants using equality,
inequality and modulo constraints. We interpret these logics in one-counter
game models which are infinite duration games played on finite control graphs
where each transition can increase or decrease the value of an unbounded
counter. That is, the state-space of these games are, generally, infinite. We
consider the model-checking problem of the logics QATL and QATLs on one-counter
game models with VASS semantics for which we develop algorithms and provide
matching lower bounds. Our algorithms are based on reductions of the
model-checking problems to model-checking games. This approach makes it quite
simple for us to deal with extensions of the logical languages as well as the
infinite state spaces. The framework generalizes on one hand qualitative
problems such as ATL/ATLs model-checking of finite-state systems,
model-checking of the branching-time temporal logics CTL and CTLs on
one-counter processes and the realizability problem of LTL specifications. On
the other hand the model-checking problem for QATL/QATLs generalizes
quantitative problems such as the fixed-initial credit problem for energy games
(in the case of QATL) and energy parity games (in the case of QATLs). Our
results are positive as we show that the generalizations are not too costly
with respect to complexity. As a byproduct we obtain new results on the
complexity of model-checking CTLs in one-counter processes and show that
deciding the winner in one-counter games with LTL objectives is
2ExpSpace-complete.Comment: 22 pages, 12 figure
Efficient computation of exact solutions for quantitative model checking
Quantitative model checkers for Markov Decision Processes typically use
finite-precision arithmetic. If all the coefficients in the process are
rational numbers, then the model checking results are rational, and so they can
be computed exactly. However, exact techniques are generally too expensive or
limited in scalability. In this paper we propose a method for obtaining exact
results starting from an approximated solution in finite-precision arithmetic.
The input of the method is a description of a scheduler, which can be obtained
by a model checker using finite precision. Given a scheduler, we show how to
obtain a corresponding basis in a linear-programming problem, in such a way
that the basis is optimal whenever the scheduler attains the worst-case
probability. This correspondence is already known for discounted MDPs, we show
how to apply it in the undiscounted case provided that some preprocessing is
done. Using the correspondence, the linear-programming problem can be solved in
exact arithmetic starting from the basis obtained. As a consequence, the method
finds the worst-case probability even if the scheduler provided by the model
checker was not optimal. In our experiments, the calculation of exact solutions
from a candidate scheduler is significantly faster than the calculation using
the simplex method under exact arithmetic starting from a default basis.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2012, arXiv:1207.055
Abstract Model Counting: A Novel Approach for Quantification of Information Leaks
acmid: 2590328 keywords: model checking, quantitative information flow, satisfiability modulo theories, symbolic execution location: Kyoto, Japan numpages: 10acmid: 2590328 keywords: model checking, quantitative information flow, satisfiability modulo theories, symbolic execution location: Kyoto, Japan numpages: 10acmid: 2590328 keywords: model checking, quantitative information flow, satisfiability modulo theories, symbolic execution location: Kyoto, Japan numpages: 10We present a novel method for Quantitative Information Flow analysis. We show how the problem of computing information leakage can be viewed as an extension of the Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) problem. This view enables us to develop a framework for QIF analysis based on the framework DPLL(T) used in SMT solvers. We then show that the methodology of Symbolic Execution (SE) also fits our framework. Based on these ideas, we build two QIF analysis tools: the first one employs CBMC, a bounded model checker for ANSI C, and the second one is built on top of Symbolic PathFinder, a Symbolic Executor for Java. We use these tools to quantify leaks in industrial code such as C programs from the Linux kernel, a Java tax program from the European project HATS, and anonymity protocol
- âŠ