Detecting Bias in Monte Carlo Renderers using Welch’s t-test

When checking the implementation of a new renderer, one usually compares the output to that of a reference implementation. However, such tests require a large number of samples to be reliable, and sometimes they are unable to reveal very subtle differences that are caused by bias, but overshadowed by random noise. We propose using Welch’s t-test, a statistical test that reliably finds small bias even at low sample counts. Welch’s t-test is an established method in statistics to determine if two sample sets have the same underlying mean, based on sample statistics. We adapt it to test whether two renderers converge to the same image, i.e., the same mean per pixel or pixel region. We also present two strategies for visualizing and analyzing the test’s results, assisting us in localizing especially problematic image regions and detecting biased implementations with high confidence at low sample counts both for the reference and tested implementation

Perceptual error optimization for Monte Carlo rendering

Realistic image synthesis involves computing high-dimensional light transport integrals which in practice are numerically estimated using Monte Carlo integration. The error of this estimation manifests itself in the image as visually displeasing aliasing or noise. To ameliorate this, we develop a theoretical framework for optimizing screen-space error distribution. Our model is flexible and works for arbitrary target error power spectra. We focus on perceptual error optimization by leveraging models of the human visual system's (HVS) point spread function (PSF) from halftoning literature. This results in a specific optimization problem whose solution distributes the error as visually pleasing blue noise in image space. We develop a set of algorithms that provide a trade-off between quality and speed, showing substantial improvements over prior state of the art. We perform evaluations using both quantitative and perceptual error metrics to support our analysis, and provide extensive supplemental material to help evaluate the perceptual improvements achieved by our methods

Quantifying the Error of Light Transport Algorithms

This paper proposes a new methodology for measuring the error of unbiased physically based rendering algorithms. The current state of the art includes mean squared error (MSE) based metrics and visual comparisons of equal‐time renderings of competing algorithms. Neither is satisfying as MSE does not describe behavior and can exhibit significant variance, and visual comparisons are inherently subjective. Our contribution is two‐fold: First, we propose to compute many short renderings instead of a single long run and use the short renderings to estimate MSE expectation and variance as well as per‐pixel standard deviation. An algorithm that achieves good results in most runs, but with occasional outliers is essentially unreliable, which we wish to quantify numerically. We use per‐pixel standard deviation to identify problematic lighting effects of rendering algorithms. The second contribution is the error spectrum ensemble (ESE), a tool for measuring the distribution of error over frequencies. The ESE serves two purposes: It reveals correlation between pixels and can be used to detect outliers, which offset the amount of error substantially.Academy of FinlandHorizon 20201111211