95 research outputs found
Prophet Secretary for Combinatorial Auctions and Matroids
The secretary and the prophet inequality problems are central to the field of
Stopping Theory. Recently, there has been a lot of work in generalizing these
models to multiple items because of their applications in mechanism design. The
most important of these generalizations are to matroids and to combinatorial
auctions (extends bipartite matching). Kleinberg-Weinberg \cite{KW-STOC12} and
Feldman et al. \cite{feldman2015combinatorial} show that for adversarial
arrival order of random variables the optimal prophet inequalities give a
-approximation. For many settings, however, it's conceivable that the
arrival order is chosen uniformly at random, akin to the secretary problem. For
such a random arrival model, we improve upon the -approximation and obtain
-approximation prophet inequalities for both matroids and
combinatorial auctions. This also gives improvements to the results of Yan
\cite{yan2011mechanism} and Esfandiari et al. \cite{esfandiari2015prophet} who
worked in the special cases where we can fully control the arrival order or
when there is only a single item.
Our techniques are threshold based. We convert our discrete problem into a
continuous setting and then give a generic template on how to dynamically
adjust these thresholds to lower bound the expected total welfare.Comment: Preliminary version appeared in SODA 2018. This version improves the
writeup on Fixed-Threshold algorithm
On the best-choice prophet secretary problem
We study a variant of the secretary problem where candidates come from
independent, not necessarily identical distributions known to us, and show that
we can do at least as well as in the IID setting. This resolves a conjecture of
Esfandiari et al.Comment: 7 page
Fishing For Better Constants: The Prophet Secretary Via Poissonization
Given n random variables taken from known distributions,
a gambler observes their realizations in this order, and needs to select one of
them, immediately after it is being observed, so that its value is as high as
possible. The classical prophet inequality shows a strategy that guarantees a
value at least half (in expectation) of that an omniscience prophet that picks
the maximum, and this ratio is tight.
Esfandiari, Hajiaghayi, Liaghat, and Monemizadeh introduced a variant of the
prophet inequality, the prophet secretary problem in [1]. The difference being
that that the realizations arrive at a random permutation order, and not an
adversarial order. Esfandiari et al. gave a simple
competitive algorithm for the problem. This was later improved in a surprising
result by Azar, Chiplunkar and Kaplan [2] into a
competitive algorithm. In a subsequent result, Correa, Saona, and Ziliotto [3]
took a systematic approach, introducing blind strategies, and gave an improved
competitive algorithm. Since then, there has been no improvements on
the lower bounds. Meanwhile, current upper bounds show that no algorithm can
achieve a competitive ratio better than [4].
In this paper, we give a -competitive algorithm for the prophet
secretary problem. The algorithm follows blind strategies introduced by [3] but
has a technical difference. We do this by re-interpretting the blind
strategies, framing them as Poissonization strategies. We break the non-iid
random variables into iid shards and argue about the competitive ratio in terms
of events on shards. This gives significantly simpler and direct proofs, in
addition to a tighter analysis on the competitive ratio. The analysis might be
of independent interest for similar problems such as the prophet inequality
with order-selectionComment: 15 page
Optimal Single-Choice Prophet Inequalities from Samples
We study the single-choice Prophet Inequality problem when the gambler is
given access to samples. We show that the optimal competitive ratio of
can be achieved with a single sample from each distribution. When the
distributions are identical, we show that for any constant ,
samples from the distribution suffice to achieve the optimal competitive
ratio () within , resolving an open problem of
Correa, D\"utting, Fischer, and Schewior.Comment: Appears in Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS) 202
Improved Revenue Bounds for Posted-Price and Second-Price Mechanisms
We study revenue maximization through sequential posted-price (SPP)
mechanisms in single-dimensional settings with buyers and independent but
not necessarily identical value distributions. We construct the SPP mechanisms
by considering the best of two simple pricing rules: one that imitates the
revenue optimal mchanism, namely the Myersonian mechanism, via the taxation
principle and the other that posts a uniform price. Our pricing rules are
rather generalizable and yield the first improvement over long-established
approximation factors in several settings. We design factor-revealing
mathematical programs that crisply capture the approximation factor of our SPP
mechanism. In the single-unit setting, our SPP mechanism yields a better
approximation factor than the state of the art prior to our work (Azar,
Chiplunkar & Kaplan, 2018). In the multi-unit setting, our SPP mechanism yields
the first improved approximation factor over the state of the art after over
nine years (Yan, 2011 and Chakraborty et al., 2010). Our results on SPP
mechanisms immediately imply improved performance guarantees for the equivalent
free-order prophet inequality problem. In the position auction setting, our SPP
mechanism yields the first higher-than approximation factor. In eager
second-price (ESP) auctions, our two simple pricing rules lead to the first
improved approximation factor that is strictly greater than what is obtained by
the SPP mechanism in the single-unit setting.Comment: Accepted to Operations Researc
- …