97,171 research outputs found
Quantum Interactive Proofs with Competing Provers
This paper studies quantum refereed games, which are quantum interactive
proof systems with two competing provers: one that tries to convince the
verifier to accept and the other that tries to convince the verifier to reject.
We prove that every language having an ordinary quantum interactive proof
system also has a quantum refereed game in which the verifier exchanges just
one round of messages with each prover. A key part of our proof is the fact
that there exists a single quantum measurement that reliably distinguishes
between mixed states chosen arbitrarily from disjoint convex sets having large
minimal trace distance from one another. We also show how to reduce the
probability of error for some classes of quantum refereed games.Comment: 13 pages, to appear in STACS 200
Quantum Proofs
Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion
of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a
quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as
QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a
certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum
computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a
superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer
computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof
system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that
exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information
during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum
complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum
analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit
some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct
and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of
complexity classes based on variants of this model.
In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning
quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of
the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive
proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof
systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum
interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and
multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*,
and MIP*.Comment: Survey published by NOW publisher
Quantum Arthur-Merlin Games
This paper studies quantum Arthur-Merlin games, which are Arthur-Merlin games
in which Arthur and Merlin can perform quantum computations and Merlin can send
Arthur quantum information. As in the classical case, messages from Arthur to
Merlin are restricted to be strings of uniformly generated random bits. It is
proved that for one-message quantum Arthur-Merlin games, which correspond to
the complexity class QMA, completeness and soundness errors can be reduced
exponentially without increasing the length of Merlin's message. Previous
constructions for reducing error required a polynomial increase in the length
of Merlin's message. Applications of this fact include a proof that logarithmic
length quantum certificates yield no increase in power over BQP and a simple
proof that QMA is contained in PP. Other facts that are proved include the
equivalence of three (or more) message quantum Arthur-Merlin games with
ordinary quantum interactive proof systems and some basic properties concerning
two-message quantum Arthur-Merlin games.Comment: 22 page
Cycles in adversarial regularized learning
Regularized learning is a fundamental technique in online optimization,
machine learning and many other fields of computer science. A natural question
that arises in these settings is how regularized learning algorithms behave
when faced against each other. We study a natural formulation of this problem
by coupling regularized learning dynamics in zero-sum games. We show that the
system's behavior is Poincar\'e recurrent, implying that almost every
trajectory revisits any (arbitrarily small) neighborhood of its starting point
infinitely often. This cycling behavior is robust to the agents' choice of
regularization mechanism (each agent could be using a different regularizer),
to positive-affine transformations of the agents' utilities, and it also
persists in the case of networked competition, i.e., for zero-sum polymatrix
games.Comment: 22 pages, 4 figure
A generalization of the Hopf-Cole transformation for stationary Mean Field Games systems
In this note we propose a transformation which decouples stationary Mean
Field Games systems with superlinear Hamiltonians of the form |p|^r, and turns
the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation into a quasi-linear equation involving the
r-Laplace operator. Such a transformation requires an assumption on solutions
of the system, which is satisfied for example in space dimension one or if
solutions are radial
Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures
This open access book constitutes the proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, FOSSACS 2020, which took place in Dublin, Ireland, in April 2020, and was held as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2020. The 31 regular papers presented in this volume were carefully reviewed and selected from 98 submissions. The papers cover topics such as categorical models and logics; language theory, automata, and games; modal, spatial, and temporal logics; type theory and proof theory; concurrency theory and process calculi; rewriting theory; semantics of programming languages; program analysis, correctness, transformation, and verification; logics of programming; software specification and refinement; models of concurrent, reactive, stochastic, distributed, hybrid, and mobile systems; emerging models of computation; logical aspects of computational complexity; models of software security; and logical foundations of data bases.
- …