20 research outputs found
Projective Expected Utility
Motivated by several classic decision-theoretic paradoxes, and by analogies
with the paradoxes which in physics motivated the development of quantum
mechanics, we introduce a projective generalization of expected utility along
the lines of the quantum-mechanical generalization of probability theory. The
resulting decision theory accommodates the dominant paradoxes, while retaining
significant simplicity and tractability. In particular, every finite game
within this larger class of preferences still has an equilibrium.Comment: 7 pages, to appear in the Proceedings of Quantum Interaction 200
Laboratory Games and Quantum Behaviour: The Normal Form with a Separable State Space
The subjective expected utility (SEU) criterion is formulated for a particular four-person âlaboratory gameâ that a Bayesian rational decision maker plays with Nature, Chance, and an Experimenter who influences what quantum behaviour is observable by choosing an orthonormal basis in a separable complex Hilbert space of latent variables. Nature chooses a state in this basis, along with an observed data series governing Chance's random choice of consequence. When Gleason's theorem holds, imposing quantum equivalence implies that the expected likelihood of any data series w.r.t. prior beliefs equals the trace of the product of appropriate subjective density and likelihood operators.
Interference Effects in Quantum Belief Networks
Probabilistic graphical models such as Bayesian Networks are one of the most
powerful structures known by the Computer Science community for deriving
probabilistic inferences. However, modern cognitive psychology has revealed
that human decisions could not follow the rules of classical probability
theory, because humans cannot process large amounts of data in order to make
judgements. Consequently, the inferences performed are based on limited data
coupled with several heuristics, leading to violations of the law of total
probability. This means that probabilistic graphical models based on classical
probability theory are too limited to fully simulate and explain various
aspects of human decision making.
Quantum probability theory was developed in order to accommodate the
paradoxical findings that the classical theory could not explain. Recent
findings in cognitive psychology revealed that quantum probability can fully
describe human decisions in an elegant framework. Their findings suggest that,
before taking a decision, human thoughts are seen as superposed waves that can
interfere with each other, influencing the final decision.
In this work, we propose a new Bayesian Network based on the psychological
findings of cognitive scientists. We made experiments with two very well known
Bayesian Networks from the literature. The results obtained revealed that the
quantum like Bayesian Network can affect drastically the probabilistic
inferences, specially when the levels of uncertainty of the network are very
high (no pieces of evidence observed). When the levels of uncertainty are very
low, then the proposed quantum like network collapses to its classical
counterpart
Applying Quantum Principles to Psychology
This article starts out with a detailed example illustrating the utility of
applying quantum probability to psychology. Then it describes several
alternative mathematical methods for mapping fundamental quantum concepts (such
as state preparation, measurement, state evolution) to fundamental
psychological concepts (such as stimulus, response, information processing).
For state preparation, we consider both pure states and densities with
mixtures. For measurement, we consider projective measurements and positive
operator valued measurements. The advantages and disadvantages of each method
with respect to applications in psychology are discussed.Comment: one of the aims of this review paper is to attract attention of
experts in quantum information and probability (as well as in quantum
foundations) to a new rapidly growing field of applications of quantum
theory. The paper establishes the correspondence between concepts of quantum
theory and concepts of cognitive science and psychology. Submitted to Physica
Script
Elementary Quantum Mechanical Principles and Social Science: Is There a Connection?
In this paper we provide first for a brief overview of some of the work which has been performed on the interface of quantum mechanics and macroscopic systems (such as economics). We then provide for an overview of how such quantum mechanical concepts can enter financial option pricing theory. We round off the paper with some suggestions on where this area of research can be heading in the near future.superposition; wave function; Black-Scholes option price; information function; probability amplitude; Schrödinger equation; Newton- Bohm trajectory; mean forward (backward) derivative
Introducing Quantum-Like Influence Diagrams for Violations of the Sure Thing Principle
It is the focus of this work to extend and study the previously proposed
quantum-like Bayesian networks to deal with decision-making scenarios by
incorporating the notion of maximum expected utility in influence diagrams. The
general idea is to take advantage of the quantum interference terms produced in
the quantum-like Bayesian Network to influence the probabilities used to
compute the expected utility of some action. This way, we are not proposing a
new type of expected utility hypothesis. On the contrary, we are keeping it
under its classical definition. We are only incorporating it as an extension of
a probabilistic graphical model in a compact graphical representation called an
influence diagram in which the utility function depends on the probabilistic
influences of the quantum-like Bayesian network.
Our findings suggest that the proposed quantum-like influence digram can
indeed take advantage of the quantum interference effects of quantum-like
Bayesian Networks to maximise the utility of a cooperative behaviour in
detriment of a fully rational defect behaviour under the prisoner's dilemma
game