185,587 research outputs found

    Lean - Mean: Tree climbing machine!

    Get PDF
    Staying fit and healthy is essential if you are planning a long and productive climbing career. Keys to maintaining good fitness and health, along with treating injuries carefully will be discussed in this interactive session. Some simple safety tips will also be up for debate. Knowing how to integrate healthy choices into your lifestyle and work could save your career and possibly more. Want to be a Lean - Mean - Tree Climbing Machine? Come along and be a part of the discussion. This session will be formed with the collaboration between health professionals and sports coache

    What Kind of Finance Should There Be?

    Get PDF

    “Critique is not a verb”:is peer review stifling the dialogue in disaster scholarship?

    Get PDF
    Purpose: In this position piece, we will reflect on some of our recent experiences with the peer review process in disaster studies and show how debate can so easily be stifled. We write it as a plea for healthy academic argumentative discussion and intellectual dialogue that would help all of us to refine our ideas, respect others’ ideas and learn from each other.Approach: We provide reflection on our own experiences. All the examples here are based on the anonymous (double-blinded) peer reviews that we have received in the past 2 years in response to papers submitted to disaster-related journals.Findings: We show that the grounds for rejection often have nothing to do with the rigour of the research but are instead based on someone’s philosophy, beliefs, values or opinions that differ from that of the authors, and which undermine the peer-review process.Originality: There is so much potential in amicable and productive disagreements, which mean that we can talk together – and through this, we can learn. Yet the debate in its purest academic sense is a rare beast in disaster scholarship – largely because opposing views do not get published. We call for is that ideological judgement and self-interest are put aside alongside our pride when peers’ work is reviewed – and that intellectual critique is used in a productive way that would enhance rather than stifle scholarship.</div

    Making Adaptive Resilience Real

    Get PDF
    This publication focuses on developing understanding and debate about adaptive resilience, and increasing sectoral understanding of its importance through experimentation and sharing of best practice

    Government By and For Millenial America: A Blueprint for 21st Century Government

    Get PDF
    Using this generation's unique ethos and commitment to pragmatic problem-solving, Millennials across the country have collaborated to design their vision for a 21st century democracy and reject the idea that our system is too broken, too stagnant, and too outdated. They have identified the parts of the system that need to be fixed while articulating what a true democracy should look like. Government By and For Millennial America, the third installment of our blueprint series, tackles some of the most fundamental, divisive, and difficult questions on the purpose of government in furthering our country's progress: how can we hear from more voices? How can we be more transparent? How can government be more egalitarian? How can we both support individual communities and the common good of every American? Most importantly, this pursuit is grounded in one fundamental idea that defines America's distinctive pursuit of self-governance: in the words of our namesake, Let us never forget that government is ourselves and not an alien power over us. The ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a President and senators and congressmen and government officials, but the voters of this country. - President Franklin D. Roosevelt We set out to craft a blueprint, and discovered, in conversations with over a thousand young people across the country, that the Millennial generation is not yet ready to give up on America's ever evolving experiment in a government by and for the people

    The public domain: Scientia nullius

    Get PDF

    What Is Safe Sex ? Understanding the Need for Sex Education Reform

    Full text link
    Currently, the United States has no standardized requirement for sex education. This has precipitated a large gap in knowledge about safe sex and a lack of consensus in current social and educational policy. Debates about abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education have reached a standstill. In an effort to advance the discussion, this paper reveals that the neuroscience behind adolescent sexual risk taking provides underutilized evidence for comprehensive sex education programs. Research shows that adolescents have biological differences in their brain structure that result in a decision-making process different from that of adults, one that can preference rash decisions and potentially unsafe behavior. Therefore, current approaches to social and education policy for teens should change, to reflect this research and in-school curricula should evolve to more effectively reduce rates of unsafe sexual behaviors. Funding for such programs would more than pay for themselves with the resulting decrease in teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases

    A High Performance Health System for the United States: An Ambitious Agenda for the Next President

    Get PDF
    Presents the recommendations of the Fund's Commission on a High Performance Health System on the reforms needed to reach and raise benchmark performance levels, such as universal coverage, cost containment, and implementing an electronic records system
    • …
    corecore