6 research outputs found
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ²
Problem of creating agricultural energy systems is of a significant multifactor system-and-situational naΒture, depending on the external economic and energy situation in the country, which predetermines accelerated development of autonomous energy centers of agro-towns based on joint use of centralized fuel and energy and local energy resources. The modern method for integrated energy supply of agro-towns as integrated territorial-and-economic entities of agro-industrial complex of the country with significant technical potential of local resources, including renewable energy sources, was develΒoped based on appropriate conceptual tools and principles of multi-level conceptual design and simulation modeling of inteΒgrated energy systems using method of conceptual expertize as advanced scientific research, pre-project technical-and-eco- nomic and technical -and-technological substantiation of rational structure of the concept project. As a priority, a systemΒatic approach to development of regional systems of pilot projects of demonstration areas of high energy efficiency based on highly organized agro-towns and, first of all, experimental farms of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus is substantiated. With this purpose, the Institute of Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus has developed software-based computing complex of an intelligent multi-level decision making support system providing simulation modΒeling and substantiation of rational scenarios for the concept project of an integrated energy system. The software package includes system of inherited and original software packages for staged procedure for performing computational experiments with a reasonable range of research risks. The conceptual content of the project depends on the Customerβs requirements, aims and objectives of the research, sectoral focus of agro-industrial enterprise, availability of sufficient technical potenΒtial of local energy resources, and the consistency of interests of the owners, regional and national governing structures of various sectors of an agro-town. The studies performed with examples of a number of agro-industrial enterprises and social and cultural sectors of agro-towns show a significant (up to 60%) improvement in quality of choosing a rational strucΒture of a concept project for an integrated energy system and reduction (203 times) in sophistication of engineering design compared to ordinary 2-3-variant technical-and-economic substantiation of the project. Acknowledgements. The research was carried out within the framework of the State Program βEnergy Systems, Processes and Technologiesβ, Sub-program 1.1 βEnergy Security and Reliability of Energy Systemsβ, 2016-2018, with the support of the Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research.ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΒΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ². Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ, ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ², Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅Π²Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΒΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ-ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°. Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°ΒΠ±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
Π·ΠΎΠ½ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ², Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΊ ΠΠ΅Π»Π°ΡΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² ΠΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΊ ΠΠ΅Π»Π°ΡΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ Π²ΡΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ-ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΠ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π‘ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ-ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ-Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ, Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ², ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠ°. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ
ΡΡΠ΄Π° Π°Π³ΡΠΎΒΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ±ΡΡΠ° Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ (Π΄ΠΎ 60 %) ΠΏΠΎΒΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ-ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (Π² 2-3 ΡΠ°Π·Π°) ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ΅ΠΌΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ 2-3-Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΒΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°. ΠΠ»Π°Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ Β«ΠΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈΒ», ΠΠΎΠ΄ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ° 1.1 Β«ΠΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ Π½Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΒ», 2016-2018 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ΅ ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ½Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ
Using structured analysis and design technique (SADT) for simulation conceptual modelling
Conceptual Modelling (CM) has received little attention in the area of Modelling and Simulation (M&S) and more specifically in Discrete Event Simulation (DES). It is widely agreed that CM is least understood despite its importance. This is however, not the case in other fields of science and engineering (especially, computer science, systems engineering and software engineering). In Computer Science (CS) alone, CM has been extensively used for requirements specification and some well-established methods are in practice. The aim of the thesis is to propose a CM framework based on the principles of software engineering and CS. The development of the framework is adapted from a well-known software engineering method called Structured Analysis and Design Technique (SADT), hence it is called SADT CM. It is argued that by adapting approaches from CS, similar benefits can be achieved in terms of formality, understanding, communication and quality. A comprehensive cross-disciplinary review of CM in CS and M&S is undertaken, which highlights the dearth of standards within M&S CM when compared to CS. Three important sub-fields of CS are considered for this purpose namely, information systems, databases and software engineering. The review identifies two potential methods that could be adopted for developing a M&S CM framework. The first method called PREView was found unsuitable for M&S CM in DES domain. Hence, the thesis concentrates on developing the framework based on SADT. The SADT CM framework is evaluated on three-in depth test cases that investigate the feasibility of the approach. The study also contributes to the literature by conducting a usability test of the CM framework in an experimental setting. A comprehensive user-guide has also been developed as part of the research for users to follow the framewor
A framework for the provision of online discrete event simulation for operational decision support in complex manufacturing environments
The engineering body of knowledge contains an array of methodologies and techniques to address the effectiveness and efficiency of operational activities within a manufacturing environment. One such example is simulation modelling, a powerful analytical tool that can potentially be valuable in assisting decision makers, managers and engineers to gauge improvement opportunities and achieve process advancements. However, the cost of ownership for simulation models is not insignificant even for large multinationals, this stems from the requirements for specialist skills in simulation software, model development, data mining and statistical analysis.
Simulation projects typically require a large investment to develop and usually are used-once-and-thrown-away. To reuse the model, it would require repeating a large portion of the development cycle. In order for simulation modelling to achieve wider recognition as a decision support tool there is a necessity to reduce the cost of model maintainability, promote reusability, increase flexibility and improve user friendliness.
The research proposed framework intends to achieve four goals.
i.) Improve and advance the deployment and maintenance requirements of simulation projects in comparison to traditional methods.
ii.) Integrate automation into model deployment phase of a simulation projects. Thus, allowing unique user-specified simulation models to be generated by automatically extracting and manipulating data from factory databases.
iii.) Enforce a strong documentation technique to achieve interoperability and re-traceability of project progress, therefore permitting programme code or even entire models to be reused and utilised in future projects.
iv.) Advance user friendliness and acceptance towards simulation modelling. Reducing the expertise required to conduct simulation studies will improve the programming exercise image associated with typical simulation studies.
This framework assists in developing customised simulation modules. These modules facilitate automated online rapid development of reconfigurable, flexible, self-maintaining simulation models, aiming to deliver tailored analysis to support real-time operational decision making
Generierung von Simulationsmodellen auf der Grundlage von Prozessmodellen
To conduct dynamic analyses on process models those models have to be dynamic models. As dynamic models based on process models a discrete simulation model can be used. However, the different application purpose prevents that process models can be directly used to conduct a simulation study.
To transfers a static process model to a dynamic simulation model the ProSiT concept was developed and applied on the process modelling notations eEPC, BPMN and UML activity diagram.
The ProSiT concept works as a central instance between different process modelling notations and different simulation systems. The concept includes transformation rules, a transformation model β the ProSiT model β and normalisation rules. Normalisation rules are designed to prepare the converted process model for the transformation in a simulation model.
First, process models are checked by notation dependent syntax rules. If the process models match the syntax, preparation rules are applied to prepare the transformation that is executed with specific transformations rules. The resulting model is the conceptual transformation model. Normalisation rules are applied to simplify the process flow or remove not required data from the model. Information that are not available in the original process model will also be added to the model with the support of normalisation rules. Those rules are designed as automatic, semi-automatic and manual rules. When a normalised transformation model is created it can be converted to a simulation system. Therefore applicability rules check whether the simulation system can simulate the model. After this check transformation rules generate the simulation model based on the normalised transformation model.Um dynamische Analysen auf Prozessmodelle anzuwenden, mΓΌssen diese als dynamische Modelle vorliegen. Bei Prozessmodellen eigenen sich fΓΌr diesen Anwendungszweck diskrete Simulationsmodelle. Aufgrund des unterschiedlichen Einsatzzweckes von Prozess- und Simulationsmodellen kΓΆnnen Prozessmodelle nicht direkt fΓΌr eine Simulation verwendet werden.
Als Ansatz, das statische Prozessmodell in ein dynamisches Simulationsmodell umzuwandeln, wurde das ProSiT Konzept entwickelt und auf die GeschΓ€ftsprozessnotationen eEPK, BPMN und das UML AktivitΓ€tsdiagramm angewendet.
Das ProSiT Konzept stellt eine zentrale Instanz zwischen verschiedenen GeschΓ€ftsprozessnotationen und Simulationsumgebungen dar. Das Konzept umfasst Transformationsregeln, ein Transformationsmodell β das ProSiT Modell β und Normalisierungsregeln zur Vorbereitung des Modells auf eine Simulation.
Prozessmodelle werden zunΓ€chst mit Vorbereitungsregeln fΓΌr eine Transformation in das ProSiT Modell vorbereitet. Das vorbereitete Modell wird anschlieΓend mit Transformationsregeln ΓΌberfΓΌhrt. Normalisierungsregeln im Kontext des ProSiT Modells vereinfachen den Prozessablauf und fΓΌgen fehlende Informationen hinzu, die fΓΌr eine Simulation notwendig sind, aber nicht im ursprΓΌnglichen Prozessmodell vorhanden sind. Diese Regeln liegen als automatische, semi-automatische und manuelle Normalisierungsregeln vor.
Ist ein Modell normalisiert, kann mittels Anwendbarkeitsregeln geprΓΌft werden, ob eine Simulationsumgebung das Modell simulieren kann. Trifft dies zu, wird mittels Transformationsregeln das Simulationsmodell aus dem normalisierten Transformationsmodell erzeugt.Auch im Buchhandel erhΓ€ltlich:
Generierung von Simulationsmodellen auf der Grundlage von Prozessmodellenl / Oliver Kloos
Ilmenau : Univ.-Verl. Ilmenau, 2014. - xiv, 508 S.
ISBN 978-3-86360-086-0
Preis: 27,20
Process Modelling Support for the Conceptual Modelling Phase of a Simulation Project
While many developments have taken place around supportingthe model coding task of simulation, there are few toolsavailable to assist in the conceptual modelling phase. Severalauthors have reported the advantages of using processmodelling tools in the early phases of a simulation project.This paper provides an overview of process modelling toolsin relation to their support for simulation, categorizing thetools into formal method and descriptive methods. A conclusionfrom this review is that none of the tools availableadequately support the requirements gathering phase ofsimulation. This is not surprising as none of the processmodelling tools were developed for explicit support of simulation.The paper then presents results of research intodeveloping a new process modelling method for simulation