An abstract interpretation for SPMD divergence on reducible control flow graphs

Vectorizing compilers employ divergence analysis to detect at which program point a specific variable is uniform, i.e. has the same value on all SPMD threads that execute this program point. They exploit uniformity to retain branching to counter branch divergence and defer computations to scalar processor units. Divergence is a hyper-property and is closely related to non-interference and binding time. There exist several divergence, binding time, and non-interference analyses already but they either sacrifice precision or make significant restrictions to the syntactical structure of the program in order to achieve soundness. In this paper, we present the first abstract interpretation for uniformity that is general enough to be applicable to reducible CFGs and, at the same time, more precise than other analyses that achieve at least the same generality. Our analysis comes with a correctness proof that is to a large part mechanized in Coq. Our experimental evaluation shows that the compile time and the precision of our analysis is on par with LLVM’s default divergence analysis that is only sound on more restricted CFGs. At the same time, our analysis is faster and achieves better precision than a state-of-the-art non-interference analysis that is sound and at least as general as our analysis

Isolation Without Taxation: {N}ear-Zero-Cost Transitions for {WebAssembly} and {SFI}

Software sandboxing or software-based fault isolation (SFI) is a lightweight approach to building secure systems out of untrusted components. Mozilla, for example, uses SFI to harden the Firefox browser by sandboxing third-party libraries, and companies like Fastly and Cloudflare use SFI to safely co-locate untrusted tenants on their edge clouds. While there have been significant efforts to optimize and verify SFI enforcement, context switching in SFI systems remains largely unexplored: almost all SFI systems use \emph{heavyweight transitions} that are not only error-prone but incur significant performance overhead from saving, clearing, and restoring registers when context switching. We identify a set of \emph{zero-cost conditions} that characterize when sandboxed code has sufficient structured to guarantee security via lightweight \emph{zero-cost} transitions (simple function calls). We modify the Lucet Wasm compiler and its runtime to use zero-cost transitions, eliminating the undue performance tax on systems that rely on Lucet for sandboxing (e.g., we speed up image and font rendering in Firefox by up to 29.7\% and 10\% respectively). To remove the Lucet compiler and its correct implementation of the Wasm specification from the trusted computing base, we (1) develop a \emph{static binary verifier}, VeriZero, which (in seconds) checks that binaries produced by Lucet satisfy our zero-cost conditions, and (2) prove the soundness of VeriZero by developing a logical relation that captures when a compiled Wasm function is semantically well-behaved with respect to our zero-cost conditions. Finally, we show that our model is useful beyond Wasm by describing a new, purpose-built SFI system, SegmentZero32, that uses x86 segmentation and LLVM with mostly off-the-shelf passes to enforce our zero-cost conditions; our prototype performs on-par with the state-of-the-art Native Client SFI system

Cautiously Optimistic Program Analyses for Secure and Reliable Software

Modern computer systems still have various security and reliability vulnerabilities. Well-known dynamic analyses solutions can mitigate them using runtime monitors that serve as lifeguards. But the additional work in enforcing these security and safety properties incurs exorbitant performance costs, and such tools are rarely used in practice. Our work addresses this problem by constructing a novel technique- Cautiously Optimistic Program Analysis (COPA). COPA is optimistic- it infers likely program invariants from dynamic observations, and assumes them in its static reasoning to precisely identify and elide wasteful runtime monitors. The resulting system is fast, but also ensures soundness by recovering to a conservatively optimized analysis when a likely invariant rarely fails at runtime. COPA is also cautious- by carefully restricting optimizations to only safe elisions, the recovery is greatly simplified. It avoids unbounded rollbacks upon recovery, thereby enabling analysis for live production software. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Cautiously Optimistic Program Analyses in three areas: Information-Flow Tracking (IFT) can help prevent security breaches and information leaks. But they are rarely used in practice due to their high performance overhead (>500% for web/email servers). COPA dramatically reduces this cost by eliding wasteful IFT monitors to make it practical (9% overhead, 4x speedup). Automatic Garbage Collection (GC) in managed languages (e.g. Java) simplifies programming tasks while ensuring memory safety. However, there is no correct GC for weakly-typed languages (e.g. C/C++), and manual memory management is prone to errors that have been exploited in high profile attacks. We develop the first sound GC for C/C++, and use COPA to optimize its performance (16% overhead). Sequential Consistency (SC) provides intuitive semantics to concurrent programs that simplifies reasoning for their correctness. However, ensuring SC behavior on commodity hardware remains expensive. We use COPA to ensure SC for Java at the language-level efficiently, and significantly reduce its cost (from 24% down to 5% on x86). COPA provides a way to realize strong software security, reliability and semantic guarantees at practical costs.PHDComputer Science & EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170027/1/subarno_1.pd