Probing-Based Preprocessing Techniques for Propositional Satisfiability

Preprocessing is an often used approach for solving hard instances of propositional satisfiability (SAT). Preprocessing can be used for reducing the number of variables and for drastically modifying the set of clauses, either by eliminating irrelevant clauses or by inferring new clauses. Over the years, a large number of formula manipulation techniques has been proposed, that in some situations have allowed solving instances not otherwise solvable with stateof -the-art SAT solvers. This paper proposes probing-based preprocessing, an integrated approach for preprocessing propositional formulas, that for the first time integrates in a single algorithm most of the existing formula manipulation techniques. Moreover, the new unified framework can be used to develop new techniques. Preliminary experimental results illustrate that probing-based preprocessing can be effectively used as a preprocessing tool in state-of-theart SAT solvers

On Improving Local Search for Unsatisfiability

Stochastic local search (SLS) has been an active field of research in the last few years, with new techniques and procedures being developed at an astonishing rate. SLS has been traditionally associated with satisfiability solving, that is, finding a solution for a given problem instance, as its intrinsic nature does not address unsatisfiable problems. Unsatisfiable instances were therefore commonly solved using backtrack search solvers. For this reason, in the late 90s Selman, Kautz and McAllester proposed a challenge to use local search instead to prove unsatisfiability. More recently, two SLS solvers - Ranger and Gunsat - have been developed, which are able to prove unsatisfiability albeit being SLS solvers. In this paper, we first compare Ranger with Gunsat and then propose to improve Ranger performance using some of Gunsat's techniques, namely unit propagation look-ahead and extended resolution

Efficient satisfiability solver

The past few decades saw great improvements in the performance of satisfiability (SAT) solvers. In this thesis, we discuss the state-of-the-art techniques used in building an efficient SAT solver. Modern SAT solvers are mainly constituted by the following components: decision heuristics, Boolean constraint propagation, conflict analysis, restart, clause deletion and preprocessing. Various algorithms and implementations in each component will be discussed and analyzed. Then we propose a new backtracking strategy, partial backtracking, which can be easily implemented in SAT solvers. It is essentially an extension of the backtracking strategy used in most SAT solvers. With partial backtracking, the solver consecutively amends the variable assignments instead of discarding them completely so that it does not backtrack as many levels as the classic strategy does after analyzing a conflict. We implemented this strategy in our solver Nigma and the experiments show that the solver benefits from this adjustment

ASlib: A Benchmark Library for Algorithm Selection

The task of algorithm selection involves choosing an algorithm from a set of algorithms on a per-instance basis in order to exploit the varying performance of algorithms over a set of instances. The algorithm selection problem is attracting increasing attention from researchers and practitioners in AI. Years of fruitful applications in a number of domains have resulted in a large amount of data, but the community lacks a standard format or repository for this data. This situation makes it difficult to share and compare different approaches effectively, as is done in other, more established fields. It also unnecessarily hinders new researchers who want to work in this area. To address this problem, we introduce a standardized format for representing algorithm selection scenarios and a repository that contains a growing number of data sets from the literature. Our format has been designed to be able to express a wide variety of different scenarios. Demonstrating the breadth and power of our platform, we describe a set of example experiments that build and evaluate algorithm selection models through a common interface. The results display the potential of algorithm selection to achieve significant performance improvements across a broad range of problems and algorithms.Comment: Accepted to be published in Artificial Intelligence Journa

The Configurable SAT Solver Challenge (CSSC)

It is well known that different solution strategies work well for different types of instances of hard combinatorial problems. As a consequence, most solvers for the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) expose parameters that allow them to be customized to a particular family of instances. In the international SAT competition series, these parameters are ignored: solvers are run using a single default parameter setting (supplied by the authors) for all benchmark instances in a given track. While this competition format rewards solvers with robust default settings, it does not reflect the situation faced by a practitioner who only cares about performance on one particular application and can invest some time into tuning solver parameters for this application. The new Configurable SAT Solver Competition (CSSC) compares solvers in this latter setting, scoring each solver by the performance it achieved after a fully automated configuration step. This article describes the CSSC in more detail, and reports the results obtained in its two instantiations so far, CSSC 2013 and 2014

GRASP: A New Search Algorithm for Satisfiability

This paper introduces GRASP (Generic search Algorithm J3r the Satisfiabilily Problem), an integrated algorithmic J3amework 30r SAT that unifies several previously proposed searchpruning techniques and jcilitates identification of additional ones. GRASP is premised on the inevitability of conflicts during search and its most distinguishingjature is the augmentation of basic backtracking search with a powerful conflict analysis procedure. Analyzing conflicts to determine their causes enables GRASP to backtrack non-chronologically to earlier levels in the search tree, potentially pruning large portions of the search space. In addition, by 'ecording" the causes of conflicts, GRASP can recognize and preempt the occurrence of similar conflicts later on in the search. Einally, straighrward bookkeeping of the causali y chains leading up to conflicts a/lows GRASP to identij) assignments that are necessary jr a solution to be found. Experimental results obtained jom a large number of benchmarks, including many J3om the field of test pattern generation, indicate that application of the proposed conflict analysis techniques to SAT algorithms can be extremely ejctive jr a large number of representative classes of SAT instances