Boolean Operations, Joins, and the Extended Low Hierarchy

We prove that the join of two sets may actually fall into a lower level of the extended low hierarchy than either of the sets. In particular, there exist sets that are not in the second level of the extended low hierarchy, EL_2, yet their join is in EL_2. That is, in terms of extended lowness, the join operator can lower complexity. Since in a strong intuitive sense the join does not lower complexity, our result suggests that the extended low hierarchy is unnatural as a complexity measure. We also study the closure properties of EL_ and prove that EL_2 is not closed under certain Boolean operations. To this end, we establish the first known (and optimal) EL_2 lower bounds for certain notions generalizing Selman's P-selectivity, which may be regarded as an interesting result in its own right.Comment: 12 page

A Simpler Proof of PH C BP[ӨP]

We simplify the proof by S. Toda [Tod89] that the polynomial hierarchy PH is contained in BP[ӨP]. Our methods bypass the technical quantifier interchange lemmas in the original proof, and clarify the counting principles on which the result depends. We also show that relative to a random oracle R, PHR is strictly contained in ӨPR

A complex analogue of Toda's Theorem

Toda \cite{Toda} proved in 1989 that the (discrete) polynomial time hierarchy, $\mathbf{PH}$, is contained in the class \mathbf{P}^{#\mathbf{P}}, namely the class of languages that can be decided by a Turing machine in polynomial time given access to an oracle with the power to compute a function in the counting complexity class #\mathbf{P}. This result, which illustrates the power of counting is considered to be a seminal result in computational complexity theory. An analogous result (with a compactness hypothesis) in the complexity theory over the reals (in the sense of Blum-Shub-Smale real machines \cite{BSS89}) was proved in \cite{BZ09}. Unlike Toda's proof in the discrete case, which relied on sophisticated combinatorial arguments, the proof in \cite{BZ09} is topological in nature in which the properties of the topological join is used in a fundamental way. However, the constructions used in \cite{BZ09} were semi-algebraic -- they used real inequalities in an essential way and as such do not extend to the complex case. In this paper, we extend the techniques developed in \cite{BZ09} to the complex projective case. A key role is played by the complex join of quasi-projective complex varieties. As a consequence we obtain a complex analogue of Toda's theorem. The results contained in this paper, taken together with those contained in \cite{BZ09}, illustrate the central role of the Poincar\'e polynomial in algorithmic algebraic geometry, as well as, in computational complexity theory over the complex and real numbers -- namely, the ability to compute it efficiently enables one to decide in polynomial time all languages in the (compact) polynomial hierarchy over the appropriate field.Comment: 31 pages. Final version to appear in Foundations of Computational Mathematic

Polynomial-time reducibilities and “almost all” oracle sets

AbstractIt is shown for every k>0 and for almost every tally setT, {A|A ⩽Pk−ttT} ≠ {A|A ⩽P(k+1)−ttT}. In contrast, it is shown that for every set A, the following holds: (a) for almost every set B,A ⩽ Pm B if and only if A ⩽ P(logn)−T B; and (b) for almost every set B, A ⩽Ptt B if and only ifA ⩽PTB

Characterizing small depth and small space classes by operators of higher types

Motivated by the question of how to define an analog of interactive proofs in the setting of logarithmic time- and space-bounded computation, we study complexity classes defined in terms of operators quantifying over oracles. We obtain new characterizations of NC1, L, NL, NP, and NSC (the nondeterministic version of SC). In some cases, we prove that our simulations are optimal (for instance, in bounding the number of queries to the oracle)

Levelable Sets and the Algebraic Structure of Parameterizations

Asking which sets are fixed-parameter tractable for a given parameterization constitutes much of the current research in parameterized complexity theory. This approach faces some of the core difficulties in complexity theory. By focussing instead on the parameterizations that make a given set fixed-parameter tractable, we circumvent these difficulties. We isolate parameterizations as independent measures of complexity and study their underlying algebraic structure. Thus we are able to compare parameterizations, which establishes a hierarchy of complexity that is much stronger than that present in typical parameterized algorithms races. Among other results, we find that no practically fixed-parameter tractable sets have optimal parameterizations

On the Power of Parity Polynomial Time

This paper proves that the complexity class Ef)P, parity polynomial time [PZ83], contains the class of languages accepted by NP machines with few accepting paths. Indeed, Ef)P contains a. broad class of languages accepted by path-restricted nondeterministic machines. In particular, Ef)P contains the polynomial accepting path versions of NP, of the counting hierarchy, and of ModmNP for m > 1. We further prove that the class of nondeterministic path-restricted languages is closed under bounded truth-table reductions