3,675 research outputs found
Linear Time Logics - A Coalgebraic Perspective
We describe a general approach to deriving linear time logics for a wide
variety of state-based, quantitative systems, by modelling the latter as
coalgebras whose type incorporates both branching behaviour and linear
behaviour. Concretely, we define logics whose syntax is determined by the
choice of linear behaviour and whose domain of truth values is determined by
the choice of branching, and we provide two equivalent semantics for them: a
step-wise semantics amenable to automata-based verification, and a path-based
semantics akin to those of standard linear time logics. We also provide a
semantic characterisation of the associated notion of logical equivalence, and
relate it to previously-defined maximal trace semantics for such systems.
Instances of our logics support reasoning about the possibility, likelihood or
minimal cost of exhibiting a given linear time property. We conclude with a
generalisation of the logics, dual in spirit to logics with discounting, which
increases their practical appeal in the context of resource-aware computation
by incorporating a notion of offsetting.Comment: Major revision of previous version: Sections 4 and 5 generalise the
results in the previous version, with new proofs; Section 6 contains new
result
Generic Trace Semantics via Coinduction
Trace semantics has been defined for various kinds of state-based systems,
notably with different forms of branching such as non-determinism vs.
probability. In this paper we claim to identify one underlying mathematical
structure behind these "trace semantics," namely coinduction in a Kleisli
category. This claim is based on our technical result that, under a suitably
order-enriched setting, a final coalgebra in a Kleisli category is given by an
initial algebra in the category Sets. Formerly the theory of coalgebras has
been employed mostly in Sets where coinduction yields a finer process semantics
of bisimilarity. Therefore this paper extends the application field of
coalgebras, providing a new instance of the principle "process semantics via
coinduction."Comment: To appear in Logical Methods in Computer Science. 36 page
Reasoning about exceptions in ontologies: from the lexicographic closure to the skeptical closure
Reasoning about exceptions in ontologies is nowadays one of the challenges
the description logics community is facing. The paper describes a preferential
approach for dealing with exceptions in Description Logics, based on the
rational closure. The rational closure has the merit of providing a simple and
efficient approach for reasoning with exceptions, but it does not allow
independent handling of the inheritance of different defeasible properties of
concepts. In this work we outline a possible solution to this problem by
introducing a variant of the lexicographical closure, that we call skeptical
closure, which requires to construct a single base. We develop a bi-preference
semantics semantics for defining a characterization of the skeptical closure
Disjunctive Probabilistic Modal Logic is Enough for Bisimilarity on Reactive Probabilistic Systems
Larsen and Skou characterized probabilistic bisimilarity over reactive
probabilistic systems with a logic including true, negation, conjunction, and a
diamond modality decorated with a probabilistic lower bound. Later on,
Desharnais, Edalat, and Panangaden showed that negation is not necessary to
characterize the same equivalence. In this paper, we prove that the logical
characterization holds also when conjunction is replaced by disjunction, with
negation still being not necessary. To this end, we introduce reactive
probabilistic trees, a fully abstract model for reactive probabilistic systems
that allows us to demonstrate expressiveness of the disjunctive probabilistic
modal logic, as well as of the previously mentioned logics, by means of a
compactness argument.Comment: Aligned content with version accepted at ICTCS 2016: fixed minor
typos, added reference, improved definitions in Section 3. Still 10 pages in
sigplanconf forma
Healthiness from Duality
Healthiness is a good old question in program logics that dates back to
Dijkstra. It asks for an intrinsic characterization of those predicate
transformers which arise as the (backward) interpretation of a certain class of
programs. There are several results known for healthiness conditions: for
deterministic programs, nondeterministic ones, probabilistic ones, etc.
Building upon our previous works on so-called state-and-effect triangles, we
contribute a unified categorical framework for investigating healthiness
conditions. We find the framework to be centered around a dual adjunction
induced by a dualizing object, together with our notion of relative
Eilenberg-Moore algebra playing fundamental roles too. The latter notion seems
interesting in its own right in the context of monads, Lawvere theories and
enriched categories.Comment: 13 pages, Extended version with appendices of a paper accepted to
LICS 201
Real-time and Probabilistic Temporal Logics: An Overview
Over the last two decades, there has been an extensive study on logical
formalisms for specifying and verifying real-time systems. Temporal logics have
been an important research subject within this direction. Although numerous
logics have been introduced for the formal specification of real-time and
complex systems, an up to date comprehensive analysis of these logics does not
exist in the literature. In this paper we analyse real-time and probabilistic
temporal logics which have been widely used in this field. We extrapolate the
notions of decidability, axiomatizability, expressiveness, model checking, etc.
for each logic analysed. We also provide a comparison of features of the
temporal logics discussed
- …