1,659 research outputs found

    Deterministic Communication in Radio Networks

    Get PDF
    In this paper we improve the deterministic complexity of two fundamental communication primitives in the classical model of ad-hoc radio networks with unknown topology: broadcasting and wake-up. We consider an unknown radio network, in which all nodes have no prior knowledge about network topology, and know only the size of the network nn, the maximum in-degree of any node Δ\Delta, and the eccentricity of the network DD. For such networks, we first give an algorithm for wake-up, based on the existence of small universal synchronizers. This algorithm runs in O(min{n,DΔ}lognlogΔloglogΔ)O(\frac{\min\{n, D \Delta\} \log n \log \Delta}{\log\log \Delta}) time, the fastest known in both directed and undirected networks, improving over the previous best O(nlog2n)O(n \log^2n)-time result across all ranges of parameters, but particularly when maximum in-degree is small. Next, we introduce a new combinatorial framework of block synchronizers and prove the existence of such objects of low size. Using this framework, we design a new deterministic algorithm for the fundamental problem of broadcasting, running in O(nlogDloglogDΔn)O(n \log D \log\log\frac{D \Delta}{n}) time. This is the fastest known algorithm for the problem in directed networks, improving upon the O(nlognloglogn)O(n \log n \log \log n)-time algorithm of De Marco (2010) and the O(nlog2D)O(n \log^2 D)-time algorithm due to Czumaj and Rytter (2003). It is also the first to come within a log-logarithmic factor of the Ω(nlogD)\Omega(n \log D) lower bound due to Clementi et al.\ (2003). Our results also have direct implications on the fastest \emph{deterministic leader election} and \emph{clock synchronization} algorithms in both directed and undirected radio networks, tasks which are commonly used as building blocks for more complex procedures

    Deterministic Digital Clustering of Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

    Full text link
    We consider deterministic distributed communication in wireless ad hoc networks of identical weak devices under the SINR model without predefined infrastructure. Most algorithmic results in this model rely on various additional features or capabilities, e.g., randomization, access to geographic coordinates, power control, carrier sensing with various precision of measurements, and/or interference cancellation. We study a pure scenario, when no such properties are available. As a general tool, we develop a deterministic distributed clustering algorithm. Our solution relies on a new type of combinatorial structures (selectors), which might be of independent interest. Using the clustering, we develop a deterministic distributed local broadcast algorithm accomplishing this task in O(ΔlogNlogN)O(\Delta \log^*N \log N) rounds, where Δ\Delta is the density of the network. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first solution in pure scenario which is only polylog(n)(n) away from the universal lower bound Ω(Δ)\Omega(\Delta), valid also for scenarios with randomization and other features. Therefore, none of these features substantially helps in performing the local broadcast task. Using clustering, we also build a deterministic global broadcast algorithm that terminates within O(D(Δ+logN)logN)O(D(\Delta + \log^* N) \log N) rounds, where DD is the diameter of the network. This result is complemented by a lower bound Ω(DΔ11/α)\Omega(D \Delta^{1-1/\alpha}), where α>2\alpha > 2 is the path-loss parameter of the environment. This lower bound shows that randomization or knowledge of own location substantially help (by a factor polynomial in Δ\Delta) in the global broadcast. Therefore, unlike in the case of local broadcast, some additional model features may help in global broadcast

    A survey of localization in wireless sensor network

    Get PDF
    Localization is one of the key techniques in wireless sensor network. The location estimation methods can be classified into target/source localization and node self-localization. In target localization, we mainly introduce the energy-based method. Then we investigate the node self-localization methods. Since the widespread adoption of the wireless sensor network, the localization methods are different in various applications. And there are several challenges in some special scenarios. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of these challenges: localization in non-line-of-sight, node selection criteria for localization in energy-constrained network, scheduling the sensor node to optimize the tradeoff between localization performance and energy consumption, cooperative node localization, and localization algorithm in heterogeneous network. Finally, we introduce the evaluation criteria for localization in wireless sensor network

    Markov Decision Processes with Applications in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey

    Full text link
    Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) consist of autonomous and resource-limited devices. The devices cooperate to monitor one or more physical phenomena within an area of interest. WSNs operate as stochastic systems because of randomness in the monitored environments. For long service time and low maintenance cost, WSNs require adaptive and robust methods to address data exchange, topology formulation, resource and power optimization, sensing coverage and object detection, and security challenges. In these problems, sensor nodes are to make optimized decisions from a set of accessible strategies to achieve design goals. This survey reviews numerous applications of the Markov decision process (MDP) framework, a powerful decision-making tool to develop adaptive algorithms and protocols for WSNs. Furthermore, various solution methods are discussed and compared to serve as a guide for using MDPs in WSNs
    corecore