10,447 research outputs found
A structured argumentation framework for detaching conditional obligations
We present a general formal argumentation system for dealing with the
detachment of conditional obligations. Given a set of facts, constraints, and
conditional obligations, we answer the question whether an unconditional
obligation is detachable by considering reasons for and against its detachment.
For the evaluation of arguments in favor of detaching obligations we use a
Dung-style argumentation-theoretical semantics. We illustrate the modularity of
the general framework by considering some extensions, and we compare the
framework to some related approaches from the literature.Comment: This is our submission to DEON 2016, including the technical appendi
Handling Defeasibilities in Action Domains
Representing defeasibility is an important issue in common sense reasoning.
In reasoning about action and change, this issue becomes more difficult because
domain and action related defeasible information may conflict with general
inertia rules. Furthermore, different types of defeasible information may also
interfere with each other during the reasoning. In this paper, we develop a
prioritized logic programming approach to handle defeasibilities in reasoning
about action. In particular, we propose three action languages {\cal AT}^{0},
{\cal AT}^{1} and {\cal AT}^{2} which handle three types of defeasibilities in
action domains named defeasible constraints, defeasible observations and
actions with defeasible and abnormal effects respectively. Each language with a
higher superscript can be viewed as an extension of the language with a lower
superscript. These action languages inherit the simple syntax of {\cal A}
language but their semantics is developed in terms of transition systems where
transition functions are defined based on prioritized logic programs. By
illustrating various examples, we show that our approach eventually provides a
powerful mechanism to handle various defeasibilities in temporal prediction and
postdiction. We also investigate semantic properties of these three action
languages and characterize classes of action domains that present more
desirable solutions in reasoning about action within the underlying action
languages.Comment: 49 pages, 1 figure, to be appeared in journal Theory and Practice
Logic Programmin
Optimizing the computation of overriding
We introduce optimization techniques for reasoning in DLN---a recently
introduced family of nonmonotonic description logics whose characterizing
features appear well-suited to model the applicative examples naturally arising
in biomedical domains and semantic web access control policies. Such
optimizations are validated experimentally on large KBs with more than 30K
axioms. Speedups exceed 1 order of magnitude. For the first time, response
times compatible with real-time reasoning are obtained with nonmonotonic KBs of
this size
Borhan: A Novel System for Prioritized Default Logic
Prioritized Default Logic presents an optimal solution for addressing
real-world problems characterized by incomplete information and the need to
establish preferences among diverse scenarios. Although it has reached great
success in the theoretical aspect, its practical implementation has received
less attention. In this article, we introduce Borhan, a system designed and
created for prioritized default logic reasoning. To create an effective system,
we have refined existing default logic definitions, including the extension
concept, and introduced novel concepts. In addition to its theoretical merits,
Borhan proves its practical utility by efficiently addressing a range of
prioritized default logic problems. In addition, one of the advantages of our
system is its ability to both store and report the explanation path for any
inferred triple, enhancing transparency and interpretability. Borhan is offered
as an open-source system, implemented in Python, and even offers a simplified
Java version as a plugin for the Protege ontology editor. Borhan thus
represents a significant step forward in bridging the gap between the
theoretical foundations of default logic and its real-world applications
Detection and resolution of normative conflicts in multi-agent systems : a literature survey
Peer reviewedPostprin
Prioritized Repairing and Consistent Query Answering in Relational Databases
A consistent query answer in an inconsistent database is an answer obtained
in every (minimal) repair. The repairs are obtained by resolving all conflicts
in all possible ways. Often, however, the user is able to provide a preference
on how conflicts should be resolved. We investigate here the framework of
preferred consistent query answers, in which user preferences are used to
narrow down the set of repairs to a set of preferred repairs. We axiomatize
desirable properties of preferred repairs. We present three different families
of preferred repairs and study their mutual relationships. Finally, we
investigate the complexity of preferred repairing and computing preferred
consistent query answers.Comment: Accepted to the special SUM'08 issue of AMA
- …