19 research outputs found
Budget Constrained Auctions with Heterogeneous Items
In this paper, we present the first approximation algorithms for the problem
of designing revenue optimal Bayesian incentive compatible auctions when there
are multiple (heterogeneous) items and when bidders can have arbitrary demand
and budget constraints. Our mechanisms are surprisingly simple: We show that a
sequential all-pay mechanism is a 4 approximation to the revenue of the optimal
ex-interim truthful mechanism with discrete correlated type space for each
bidder. We also show that a sequential posted price mechanism is a O(1)
approximation to the revenue of the optimal ex-post truthful mechanism when the
type space of each bidder is a product distribution that satisfies the standard
hazard rate condition. We further show a logarithmic approximation when the
hazard rate condition is removed, and complete the picture by showing that
achieving a sub-logarithmic approximation, even for regular distributions and
one bidder, requires pricing bundles of items. Our results are based on
formulating novel LP relaxations for these problems, and developing generic
rounding schemes from first principles. We believe this approach will be useful
in other Bayesian mechanism design contexts.Comment: Final version accepted to STOC '10. Incorporates significant reviewer
comment
Lottery pricing equilibria
We extend the notion of Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibrium, as defined by Feldman et al. [2013], to settings with budgets. When agents have budgets, the maximum social welfare as traditionally defined is not a suitable benchmark since it is overly optimistic. This motivated the liquid welfare of [Dobzinski and Paes Leme 2014] as an alternative. Observing that no combinatorial Walrasian equilibrium guarantees a non-zero fraction of the maximum liquid welfare in the absence of randomization, we instead work with randomized allocations and extend the notions of liquid welfare and Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibrium accordingly. Our generalization of the Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibrium prices lotteries over bundles of items rather than bundles, and we term it a lottery pricing equilibrium. Our results are two-fold. First, we exhibit an efficient algorithm which turns a randomized allocation with liquid expected welfare W into a lottery pricing equilibrium with liquid expected welfare 3-√5/2 W (≈ 0.3819-W). Next, given access to a demand oracle and an α-approximate oblivious rounding algorithm for the configuration linear program for the welfare maximization problem, we show how to efficiently compute a randomized allocation which is (a) supported on polynomially-many deterministic allocations and (b) obtains [nearly] an α fraction of the optimal liquid expected welfare. In the case of subadditive valuations, combining both results yields an efficient algorithm which computes a lottery pricing equilibrium obtaining a constant fraction of the optimal liquid expected welfare. © Copyright 2016 ACM
A Simple and Approximately Optimal Mechanism for an Additive Buyer
We consider a monopolist seller with heterogeneous items, facing a single
buyer. The buyer has a value for each item drawn independently according to
(non-identical) distributions, and her value for a set of items is additive.
The seller aims to maximize his revenue.
We suggest using the a-priori better of two simple pricing methods: selling
the items separately, each at its optimal price, and bundling together, in
which the entire set of items is sold as one bundle at its optimal price. We
show that for any distribution, this mechanism achieves a constant-factor
approximation to the optimal revenue.
Beyond its simplicity, this is the first computationally tractable mechanism
to obtain a constant-factor approximation for this multi-parameter problem. We
additionally discuss extensions to multiple buyers and to valuations that are
correlated across items
Approximate Revenue Maximization with Multiple Items
Maximizing the revenue from selling _more than one_ good (or item) to a
single buyer is a notoriously difficult problem, in stark contrast to the
one-good case. For two goods, we show that simple "one-dimensional" mechanisms,
such as selling the goods separately, _guarantee_ at least 73% of the optimal
revenue when the valuations of the two goods are independent and identically
distributed, and at least when they are independent. For the case of
independent goods, we show that selling them separately guarantees at
least a fraction of the optimal revenue; and, for independent and
identically distributed goods, we show that selling them as one bundle
guarantees at least a fraction of the optimal revenue. Additional
results compare the revenues from the two simple mechanisms of selling the
goods separately and bundled, identify situations where bundling is optimal,
and extend the analysis to multiple buyers.Comment: Presented in ACM EC conference, 201
A General Theory of Sample Complexity for Multi-Item Profit Maximization
The design of profit-maximizing multi-item mechanisms is a notoriously
challenging problem with tremendous real-world impact. The mechanism designer's
goal is to field a mechanism with high expected profit on the distribution over
buyers' values. Unfortunately, if the set of mechanisms he optimizes over is
complex, a mechanism may have high empirical profit over a small set of samples
but low expected profit. This raises the question, how many samples are
sufficient to ensure that the empirically optimal mechanism is nearly optimal
in expectation? We uncover structure shared by a myriad of pricing, auction,
and lottery mechanisms that allows us to prove strong sample complexity bounds:
for any set of buyers' values, profit is a piecewise linear function of the
mechanism's parameters. We prove new bounds for mechanism classes not yet
studied in the sample-based mechanism design literature and match or improve
over the best known guarantees for many classes. The profit functions we study
are significantly different from well-understood functions in machine learning,
so our analysis requires a sharp understanding of the interplay between
mechanism parameters and buyer values. We strengthen our main results with
data-dependent bounds when the distribution over buyers' values is
"well-behaved." Finally, we investigate a fundamental tradeoff in sample-based
mechanism design: complex mechanisms often have higher profit than simple
mechanisms, but more samples are required to ensure that empirical and expected
profit are close. We provide techniques for optimizing this tradeoff