18 research outputs found

    ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ๋Œ€์—ญ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋ผ ํ†ต์‹ ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. ๋ฐ•์„ธ์›….3GPP๋Š” LAA (licensed-assisted access)๋ผ๊ณ ํ•˜๋Š” 5GHz ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ LTE๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. LAA๋Š” ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด Wi-Fi์˜ CSMA / CA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision avoidance)์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ LBT (Listen Before Talk) ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ LAA ๋‹ค์šด ๋งํฌ ๋ฒ„์ŠคํŠธ์˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ ํ—ค๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ „ LBT ์ž‘์—…. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์˜ ๋‹ค์Œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์—ญ ๋…๋ฆฝํ˜• ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ . ๊ธฐ์กด WiFi ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ๋Š” LAA์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์„œ์‹ ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฒฝํ•ฉ ์ง„ํ™” ๋œ NodeB๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ LAA ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด Markov ์ฒด์ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. LAA ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ ํ—ค๋“œ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•. LTE-LAA๋Š” LTE์—์„œ ์ƒ์† ๋œ ์†๋„ ์ ์‘ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ ์‘ ๋ณ€์กฐ ๋ฐ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ (AMC) ์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. AMC๋Š” ์ง„ํ™” ๋œ nodeB (eNB)๊ฐ€ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ „์†ก์˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํ‘œ์‹œ๊ธฐ ํ”ผ๋“œ ๋ฐฑ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ „์†ก์„์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณ€์กฐ ๋ฐ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ๋ฐฉ์‹ (MCS)์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋•์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค ๋Œ€์—ญ์—์„œ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด LTE์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋…ธ๋“œ ๊ฒฝํ•ฉ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ AMC ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ž˜ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ์—์„œ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” LTE-LAA ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด AMC ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํŽธ์ง€์—์„œ๋Š” AMC ์šด์˜์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ LTELAA ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ ์šด Markov ์ฒด์ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์„  ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ถ„์„์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” Rayleigh ํŽ˜์ด๋”ฉ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ns-3 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„๊ต ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ‰๊ท  ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ 99.5%๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด 3GPP๋Š” LTE-LAA๋ฅผ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์šด์˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ๋™์ž‘์€ OOBE์— ์ทจ์•ฝํ•˜๊ณ  ์ œํ•œ๋œ ์ „์†ก ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„ํšจ์œจ์  ์ธ ์ฑ„๋„ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ฑ„๋„ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์ „์†ก ๋ฒ„์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ๋กœ ๋ถ„ํ• ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „์†ก ์ „๋ ฅ ์ œํ•œ์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์งง์€ ์„œ๋ธŒ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ „์†ก ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์—ฌ OOBE ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์ •์˜ ๋ผ๋””์˜ค๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋กœํ†  ํƒ€์ž…์€ 99% ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์‹คํ–‰ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ns-3 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๊ธฐ์กด LBT ์œ ํ˜• A ๋ฐ ์œ ํ˜• B์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์ธ์ง€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 59% ๋ฐ 21.5%์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ ํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ๊ฑฐ์‹œ LAA์—๋Š” ๋ฐฐํฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— 3GPP์™€ MulteFire ์–ผ๋ผ์ด์–ธ์Šค๋Š” ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ ๋…๋ฆฝํ˜• ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹  ์‹œ์Šค ํ…œ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ข…๋ž˜์˜ ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ ๋…๋ฆฝํ˜• ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹  ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์ƒํ–ฅ ๋งํฌ ์ œ์–ด ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€์˜ ์ „์†ก ํ™•๋ฅ ์ด ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ Wi-Fi ๋ธ”๋ก ACK ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์— ์—… ๋งํฌ ์ œ์–ด ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋„ฃ๋Š” W ARQ : Wi-Fi ์ง€์› HARQ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ W-ARQ์˜ ์ฒ˜ ๋ฆฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ HARQ ๋ฐ ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ๋ง ๋œ Minstrel์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ธฐ์กด MulteFire๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ œ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋†’์€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋ ˆ๊ฑฐ์‹œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์˜ HARQ๋Š” ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ด์œ ๋กœ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ตœ์ฒจ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ ์ˆ ์— ๋น„ํ•ด UPT ๋ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” OOBE ์ธ์‹ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ๋ฐ W-ARQ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.3GPP has developed 5 GHz unlicensed band LTE, referred to as licensed-assisted access (LAA). LAA adopts listen before talk (LBT) operation, resembling Wi-Fis carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA), to enable collision avoidance capability, while the frame structure overhead of each LAA downlink burst varies with the ending time of each preceding LBT operation. In this dissertation, we propose numerical model to analyze unlicensed band cellular communication. Next, we consider the following two enhancements of unlicensed band cellular communication: (i) out-of-band emission (OOBE) aware additional carrier access, and (ii) Wi-Fi assisted hybrid automatic repeat request (H-ARQ) for unlicensed-band stand-alone cellular communication. Given that, existing analytic models of Wi-Fi cannot be used to evaluate the performance of LAA, in this letter, we propose a novel Markov chain-based analytic model to analyze the performance of LAA network composed of multiple contending evolved NodeBs by considering the variation of the LAA frame structure overhead. LTE-LAA adopts adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) for the rate adaptation algorithm inherited from LTE. AMC helps the evolved nodeB (eNB) to select a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for the next transmission using the channel quality indicator feedback of the current transmission. For the conventional LTE operating in the licensed band, there is no node contention problem and AMC performance has been well studied. However, in the case of LTE-LAA operating in the unlicensed band, AMC performance has not been properly addressed due to the collision problem. In this letter, we propose a novel Markov chain-based analysis model for analyzing LTELAA performance under a realistic channel model considering AMC operation. We adopt Rayleigh fading channel model widely used in wireless network analysis, and compare our analysis results with the results obtained from ns-3 simulator. Comparison results show an average accuracy of 99.5%, which demonstrates the accuracy of our analysis model. Due to the requirement for a high data rate, the 3GPP has provided multi-carrier operation for LTE-LAA. However, multi-carrier operation is susceptible to OOBE and uses limited transmission power, resulting in inefficient channel usage. This paper proposes a novel multi-carrier access scheme to enhance channel efficiency. Our proposed scheme divides a transmission burst into multiple ones and uses short subframe transmission while meeting the transmission power limitation. In addition, we propose an energy detection algorithm to overcome the OOBE problem by deciding the channel status accurately. Our prototype using software-defined radio shows the feasibility and performance of the energy detection algorithm that determines the channel status with over 99% accuracy. Through ns-3 simulation, we confirm that the proposed multi-carrier access scheme achieves up to 59% and 21.5% performance gain in userperceived throughput compared with the conventional LBT type A and type B, respectively. Since the legacy LAA has deployment problem, 3GPP and MulteFire alliance proposed unlicensed band stand-alone cellular communication system. However, conventional unlicensed band stand-alone cellular communication system has low transmission probability of uplink control messages. This disertation proposes W-ARQ: Wi-Fi assisted HARQ which put uplink control messages into Wi-Fi block ACK frame. In addition we propose parallel HARQ and clustered Minstrel to enhance throughput performance of W-ARQ. Our proposed algorithm shows high throughput performance where conventional MulteFire shows almost zero throughput performance. In summary, we analyze the performance of unlicensed-band cellular communication. By using the proposed model, we insist the legacy multi-carrier operation and HARQ of unlicensed cellular communication is not efficient. By this reason, we propose OOBE aware additional access and W-ARQ which achievee enhancements of network performance such as UPT and throughput compared with state-of-the-art techniques.Abstract i Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Unlicensed Band Communication System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Overview of Existing Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2.1 License-assisted access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2.2 Further LAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2.3 Non-3GPP Unlicensed Band Cellular Communication . . . . 6 1.3 Main Contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.3.1 Performance Analysis of LTE-LAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.3.2 Out-of-Band Emission Aware Additional Carrier Access for LTE-LAA Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3.3 W-ARQ: Wi-Fi Assisted HARQ for Unlicensed Band StandAlone Cellular Communication System . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.4 Organization of the Dissertation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2 Performance Analysis of LTE-LAA network 10 2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.2 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.3 Proposed Markov-Chain Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.3.1 Markov Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.3.2 Markov Chain Model for EPS Type Variation . . . . . . . . . 16 2.3.3 LAA Network Throughput Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.4 Model Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3 Out-of-Band Emission Aware Additional Carrier Access for LTE-LAA Network 35 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.2 Related work and Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.1 Related work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.2 Listen Before Talk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.2.3 Out-of-Band Emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.3 Multi-carrier Operation of LTE-LAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.4 Carrier Sensing considering Out-of-Band Emission . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.4.1 Energy Detection Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3.4.2 Nominal Band Energy Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.4.3 OOBE-Free Region Energy Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.5 Additional Carrier Access Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.5.1 Basic Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.5.2 Transmission Power Limitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.5.3 Dividing Transmission Burst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.5.4 Short Subframe Decision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.6 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.6.1 Performance of Energy Detection considering OOBE . . . . . 57 3.6.2 Simulation Environments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.6.3 Performance of Proposed Carrier Access Scheme . . . . . . . 58 3.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 4 W-ARQ: Wi-Fi Assisted HARQ for Unlicensed Band Stand-Alone Cellular Communication System 66 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4.2 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.3 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4.4 W-ARQ: Wi-Fi assisted HARQ for Unlicensed Band Stand-Alone Cellular Communication System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4.4.1 Parallel HARQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4.4.2 Clustered Minstrel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 4.5 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 4.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5 Concluding Remarks 80 5.1 Research Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.2 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Abstract (In Korean) 90 ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ธ€ 93Docto

    Survey of Spectrum Sharing for Inter-Technology Coexistence

    Full text link
    Increasing capacity demands in emerging wireless technologies are expected to be met by network densification and spectrum bands open to multiple technologies. These will, in turn, increase the level of interference and also result in more complex inter-technology interactions, which will need to be managed through spectrum sharing mechanisms. Consequently, novel spectrum sharing mechanisms should be designed to allow spectrum access for multiple technologies, while efficiently utilizing the spectrum resources overall. Importantly, it is not trivial to design such efficient mechanisms, not only due to technical aspects, but also due to regulatory and business model constraints. In this survey we address spectrum sharing mechanisms for wireless inter-technology coexistence by means of a technology circle that incorporates in a unified, system-level view the technical and non-technical aspects. We thus systematically explore the spectrum sharing design space consisting of parameters at different layers. Using this framework, we present a literature review on inter-technology coexistence with a focus on wireless technologies with equal spectrum access rights, i.e. (i) primary/primary, (ii) secondary/secondary, and (iii) technologies operating in a spectrum commons. Moreover, we reflect on our literature review to identify possible spectrum sharing design solutions and performance evaluation approaches useful for future coexistence cases. Finally, we discuss spectrum sharing design challenges and suggest future research directions

    FAIR SHARING of CHANNEL RESOURCES in the COEXISTENCE of HETEROGENEOUS WIRELESS NETWORKS

    Get PDF
    Increasing spectrum resources in cellular networks are always needed to carry the exponential data traffic growth in wireless cellular networks. Limited spectrum resources in the licensed band have necessitated Long-Term Evolution (LTE) to explore available unlicensed spectrum where an incumbent WiFi system already exists. With the deployment of Licensed Assisted Access (LAA) that utilizes Listen Before Talk (LBT) for channel access in the unlicensed spectrum along with an incumbent WiFi, the coexistence of LAA and WiFi with acceptable fairness is a major challenge. In this work, we address the issues of licensed assisted access coexisting with incumbent WiFi in an unlicensed spectrum and provide solutions to dynamically tune system parameters of LAA stations to achieve maximum total throughput from the overall system taking into account fair allocation of throughput and airtime across different networks and stations. One major system parameter we study is the contention window size for back-off. Using the method of coupled Markov Chain, we show how an inherent trade-off between throughput and airtime fairness can be managed by adjusting the CW size of LAA. For single-channel, we show how coexistence with WiFi can be managed better with LAA-Cat3 than LAA-Cat4 when total throughput and fairness are to be taken into account. For multi-carrier sensing, we establish better coexistence by optimizing contention window sizes of each LAA station separately using an assignment technique based on a genetic algorithm. We extend our work into dual-carrier aggregation where some stations have the ability to combine two independent channels into a single aggregated channel to achieve higher performance. We show that in such a dual-carrier aggregation scenario, the distribution of stations (partition) over an individual and aggregated channel, and the system parameters (contention window size and load intensity) could be optimized to ensure fair allocation of resources without affecting the secondary channel too much

    ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ๋Œ€์—ญ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋ผ ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021.8. ๋ฐ•์„ธ์›….The 3rd generation partnership project (3GPP) has standardized long-term evolution (LTE) licensed-assisted access (LTE-LAA) that uses a wide unlicensed band as an alternative solution to the insufficient bandwidth problem of the existing LTE. 3GPP cellular communications in unlicensed spectrum allow transmission only after completing listen-before-talk (LBT) operation. For downlink, the LBT operation helps cellular traffic to coexist well with Wi-Fi traffic. However, cellular uplink transmission is attempted only at the time specifically determined by the base station after having a successful LBT and the user equipment (UE) may suffer transmission failure and delayed transmission due to Wi-Fi interference. As a result, cellular uplink traffic does not coexist well with Wi-Fi traffic. NR-U suffers from the collision issue because its channel access mechanism is similar to that of Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi solves the collision problem through the request-to-send/clear-to-send (RTS/CTS) mechanism. However, NR-U has no way of solving the collision problem. As a result, NR-U suffers severe performance degradation due to collisions as the number of contending nodes increases. In this dissertation, we consider the following two enhancements to cellular communication in the unlicensed spectrum: (i) Uplink channel access enhancement for solving poor uplink performance and (ii) collision minimization for efficient channel utilization. First, we mathematically analyze the problem of unfairness between cellular and Wi-Fi for uplink channel access. To address the coexistence problem in unlicensed spectrum, we propose a standard-compliant approach, termed UpChance, which allows the UE to use a minimum length of uplink reservation signal (RS) and the base station to determine the optimal timing for the UE's uplink transmission. Through ns-3 simulation, we verify that UpChance improves the performance of fairness and random access completion time by up to 88% and 99%, respectively. Second, we propose to extend an RS duration and use a split RS for reservation in NR-U that consists of front RS and rear RS and design a new collision minimization scheme, termed R-SplitC, that contains two components: new split RS operation and contention window size (CWS) control. New split RS operation helps to minimize collisions in NR-U transmissions, and CWS control works to protect the performance of other communication technologies such as Wi-Fi. We mathematically analyze and evaluate the performance of our scheme and confirm that R-SplitC improves network throughput by up to 100.6% compared to the baseline RS scheme without degrading Wi-Fi performance. In summary, we propose standard-compliant uplink channel access enhancement scheme and collision minimization scheme for cellular communication in unlicensed spectrum. Through this research, we achieve enhancements of network performance such as throughput and fairness.3์„ธ๋Œ€ ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ์‹ญ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด LTE์˜ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ๋Œ€์—ญํญ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ๋„“์€ ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค ์ง€์› ์ ‘์†์„ ํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ์—์„œ 3GPP ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์€ LBT ๋™์ž‘์„ ์™„๋ฃŒํ•œ ํ›„์—๋งŒ ์ „์†ก์„ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์šด๋งํฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ LBT ์ž‘์—…์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์ด ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ๊ณผ ์ž˜ ๊ณต์กดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ์—…๋งํฌ ์ „์†ก์€ LBT ์„ฑ๊ณต ํ›„ ๊ธฐ์ง€๊ตญ์— ์˜ํ•ด ํŠน๋ณ„ํžˆ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—๋งŒ ์‹œ๋„๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์žฅ๋น„๋Š” ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด์˜ ๊ฐ„์„ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ „์†ก ์‹คํŒจ์™€ ์ „์†ก ์ง€์—ฐ์„ ๊ฒช์„ ํ™•๋ฅ ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ์—…๋งํฌ ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์ด ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด ํŠธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ๊ณผ ์ž˜ ๊ณต์กดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค ์ง€์› ์ ‘์† ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๋˜ํ•œ ์ฑ„๋„ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ด ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด์˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋™์‹œ ์ „์†ก์œผ๋กœ ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฒช๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด๋Š” RTS/CTS ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค ์ง€์› ์ ‘์† ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค ์ง€์› ์ ‘์† ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๊ฒฝํ•ฉ ๋…ธ๋“œ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ถฉ๋Œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒช๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ์—์„œ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค. (i) ์—…๋งํฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—…๋งํฌ ์ฑ„๋„ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๋ฐ (ii) ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ฑ„๋„ ํ™œ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถฉ๋Œ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์—…๋งํฌ ์ฑ„๋„ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ์™€ ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ถˆ๊ณต์ •์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณต์กด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ง์ด ์ตœ์†Œ ๊ธธ์ด์˜ ์—…๋งํฌ ์˜ˆ์•ฝ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์ง€๊ตญ์ด ๋‹จ๋ง์˜ ์—…๋งํฌ ์ „์†ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํƒ€์ด๋ฐ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” UpChance๋ผ๋Š” ํ‘œ์ค€์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒํ–ฅ ๋งํฌ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ns-3 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด UpChance๊ฐ€ ๊ณต์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋žœ๋ค ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ์™„๋ฃŒ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 88%, 99% ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ „๋ฐฉ ์˜ˆ์•ฝ์‹ ํ˜ธ์™€ ํ›„๋ฐฉ ์˜ˆ์•ฝ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ถ„ํ•  ์˜ˆ์•ฝ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฒฝํ•ฉ ์ฐฝ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” R-SplitC๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ถฉ๋Œ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ถ„ํ•  ์˜ˆ์•ฝ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค ์ง€์› ์ ‘์† ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ „์†ก๊ฐ„์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์„ ์ฃผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฝํ•ฉ ์ฐฝ ํฌ๊ธฐ ์ œ์–ด๋Š” ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ†ต์‹  ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ์ฒด๊ณ„์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ R-SplitC๊ฐ€ ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์˜ˆ์•ฝ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ฒด๊ณ„์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 100.6% ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋น„๋ฉดํ—ˆ ๋Œ€์—ญ์—์„œ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋Ÿฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—…๋งํฌ ์ฑ„๋„ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ๋ฐ ์ถฉ๋Œ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ตœ์ฒจ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ๊ณต์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์˜ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Main Contributions 2 1.2.1 Uplink Channel Access Enhancement for Cellular Communication in Unlicensed Spectrum 2 1.2.2 R-SplitC: Collision Minimization for Cellular Communication in Unlicensed Spectrum 3 1.3 Organization of the Dissertation 4 2 Uplink Channel Access Enhancement for Cellular Communication in Unlicensed Spectrum 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Related Work and Preliminaries 7 2.2.1 Related Work 7 2.2.2 Preliminaries 8 2.3 Mathematical Analysis for Unfairness between Uplink Cellular and Wi-Fi 10 2.3.1 PRACH scenario 10 2.3.2 UL data scenario 13 2.4 Proposed Scheme 17 2.4.1 UE Operation 18 2.4.2 eNB Operation 19 2.5 Performance Evaluation 24 2.5.1 Simulation Environments 24 2.5.2 UL data transmission 25 2.5.3 Random access 27 2.6 Summary 29 3 R-SplitC: Collision Minimization for Cellular Communication in Unlicensed Spectrum 37 3.1 Introduction 37 3.2 Related Work and Preliminaries 39 3.2.1 Related Work 39 3.2.2 NR-U 40 3.2.3 listen-before-talk (LBT) 41 3.2.4 reservation signal and mini-slot 41 3.2.5 Wi-Fi 42 3.3 Proposed Scheme 44 3.3.1 New RS structure 46 3.3.2 CWS control 48 3.4 Performance Analysis 49 3.4.1 Throughput Analysis for R-Split 49 3.4.2 Throughput Analysis for R-SplitC 55 3.5 Performance Evaluation 57 3.5.1 Performance Evaluation for an NR-U only Network 58 3.5.2 Performance Evaluation for an NR-U/Wi-Fi Network 61 3.6 Summary 65 4 Concluding Remarks 67 4.1 Research Contributions 67 4.2Future Work 68 Abstract (In Korean) 75 ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์˜๊ธ€ 78๋ฐ•

    Spectrum Sharing, Latency, and Security in 5G Networks with Application to IoT and Smart Grid

    Get PDF
    The surge of mobile devices, such as smartphones, and tables, demands additional capacity. On the other hand, Internet-of-Things (IoT) and smart grid, which connects numerous sensors, devices, and machines require ubiquitous connectivity and data security. Additionally, some use cases, such as automated manufacturing process, automated transportation, and smart grid, require latency as low as 1 ms, and reliability as high as 99.99\%. To enhance throughput and support massive connectivity, sharing of the unlicensed spectrum (3.5 GHz, 5GHz, and mmWave) is a potential solution. On the other hand, to address the latency, drastic changes in the network architecture is required. The fifth generation (5G) cellular networks will embrace the spectrum sharing and network architecture modifications to address the throughput enhancement, massive connectivity, and low latency. To utilize the unlicensed spectrum, we propose a fixed duty cycle based coexistence of LTE and WiFi, in which the duty cycle of LTE transmission can be adjusted based on the amount of data. In the second approach, a multi-arm bandit learning based coexistence of LTE and WiFi has been developed. The duty cycle of transmission and downlink power are adapted through the exploration and exploitation. This approach improves the aggregated capacity by 33\%, along with cell edge and energy efficiency enhancement. We also investigate the performance of LTE and ZigBee coexistence using smart grid as a scenario. In case of low latency, we summarize the existing works into three domains in the context of 5G networks: core, radio and caching networks. Along with this, fundamental constraints for achieving low latency are identified followed by a general overview of exemplary 5G networks. Besides that, a loop-free, low latency and local-decision based routing protocol is derived in the context of smart grid. This approach ensures low latency and reliable data communication for stationary devices. To address data security in wireless communication, we introduce a geo-location based data encryption, along with node authentication by k-nearest neighbor algorithm. In the second approach, node authentication by the support vector machine, along with public-private key management, is proposed. Both approaches ensure data security without increasing the packet overhead compared to the existing approaches

    Expansive networks : exploiting spectrum sharing for capacity boost and 6G vision

    Get PDF
    Adaptive capacity with cost-efficient resource provisioning is a crucial capability for future 6G networks. In this work, we conceptualize "expansive networks" which refers to a networking paradigm where networks should be able to extend their resource base by opportunistic but self-controlled expansive actions. To this end, we elaborate on a key aspect of an expansive network as a concrete example: Spectrum resource at the PHY layer. Evidently, future wireless networks need to provide efficient mechanisms to coexist in the licensed and unlicensed bands and operate in expansive mode. In this work, we first describe spectrum sharing issues and possibilities in 6G networks for expansive networks. We then present security implications of expansive networks, an important concern due to more open and coupled systems in expansive networks. We also discuss two key enablers, namely distributed ledger technology (DLT) and network intelligence via machine learning, which are promising to realize expansive networks for the spectrum sharing aspect

    Using hypergraph theory to model coexistence management and coordinated spectrum allocation for heterogeneous wireless networks operating in shared spectrum

    Get PDF
    Electromagnetic waves in the Radio Frequency (RF) spectrum are used to convey wireless transmissions from one radio antenna to another. Spectrum utilisation factor, which refers to how readily a given spectrum can be reused across space and time while maintaining an acceptable level of transmission errors, is used to measure how efficiently a unit of frequency spectrum can be allocated to a specified number of users. The demand for wireless applications is increasing exponentially, hence there is a need for efficient management of the RF spectrum. However, spectrum usage studies have shown that the spectrum is under-utilised in space and time. A regulatory shift from static spectrum assignment to DSA is one way of addressing this. Licence exemption policy has also been advanced in Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) systems to spur wireless innovation and universal access to the internet. Furthermore, there is a shift from homogeneous to heterogeneous radio access and usage of the same spectrum band. These three shifts from traditional spectrum management have led to the challenge of coexistence among heterogeneous wireless networks which access the spectrum using DSA techniques. Cognitive radios have the ability for spectrum agility based on spectrum conditions. However, in the presence of multiple heterogeneous networks and without spectrum coordination, there is a challenge related to switching between available channels to minimise interference and maximise spectrum allocation. This thesis therefore focuses on the design of a framework for coexistence management and spectrum coordination, with the objective of maximising spectrum utilisation across geographical space and across time. The amount of geographical coverage in which a frequency can be used is optimised through frequency reuse while ensuring that harmful interference is minimised. The time during which spectrum is occupied is increased through time-sharing of the same spectrum by two or more networks, while ensuring that spectrum is shared by networks that can coexist in the same spectrum and that the total channel load is not excessive to prevent spectrum starvation. Conventionally, a graph is used to model relationships between entities such as interference relationships among networks. However, the concept of an edge in a graph is not sufficient to model relationships that involve more than two entities, such as more than two networks that are able to share the same channel in the time domain, because an edge can only connect two entities. On the other hand, a hypergraph is a generalisation of an undirected graph in which a hyperedge can connect more than two entities. Therefore, this thesis investigates the use of hypergraph theory to model the RF environment and the spectrum allocation scheme. The hypergraph model was applied to an algorithm for spectrum sharing among 100 heterogeneous wireless networks, whose geo-locations were randomly and independently generated in a 50 km by 50 km area. Simulation results for spectrum utilisation performance have shown that the hypergraph-based model allocated channels, on average, to 8% more networks than the graph-based model. The results also show that, for the same RF environment, the hypergraph model requires up to 36% fewer channels to achieve, on average, 100% operational networks, than the graph model. The rate of growth of the running time of the hypergraph-based algorithm with respect to the input size is equal to the square of the input size, like the graph-based algorithm. Thus, the model achieved better performance at no additional time complexity.Electromagnetic waves in the Radio Frequency (RF) spectrum are used to convey wireless transmissions from one radio antenna to another. Spectrum utilisation factor, which refers to how readily a given spectrum can be reused across space and time while maintaining an acceptable level of transmission errors, is used to measure how efficiently a unit of frequency spectrum can be allocated to a specified number of users. The demand for wireless applications is increasing exponentially, hence there is a need for efficient management of the RF spectrum. However, spectrum usage studies have shown that the spectrum is under-utilised in space and time. A regulatory shift from static spectrum assignment to DSA is one way of addressing this. Licence exemption policy has also been advanced in Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) systems to spur wireless innovation and universal access to the internet. Furthermore, there is a shift from homogeneous to heterogeneous radio access and usage of the same spectrum band. These three shifts from traditional spectrum management have led to the challenge of coexistence among heterogeneous wireless networks which access the spectrum using DSA techniques. Cognitive radios have the ability for spectrum agility based on spectrum conditions. However, in the presence of multiple heterogeneous networks and without spectrum coordination, there is a challenge related to switching between available channels to minimise interference and maximise spectrum allocation. This thesis therefore focuses on the design of a framework for coexistence management and spectrum coordination, with the objective of maximising spectrum utilisation across geographical space and across time. The amount of geographical coverage in which a frequency can be used is optimised through frequency reuse while ensuring that harmful interference is minimised. The time during which spectrum is occupied is increased through time-sharing of the same spectrum by two or more networks, while ensuring that spectrum is shared by networks that can coexist in the same spectrum and that the total channel load is not excessive to prevent spectrum starvation. Conventionally, a graph is used to model relationships between entities such as interference relationships among networks. However, the concept of an edge in a graph is not sufficient to model relationships that involve more than two entities, such as more than two networks that are able to share the same channel in the time domain, because an edge can only connect two entities. On the other hand, a hypergraph is a generalisation of an undirected graph in which a hyperedge can connect more than two entities. Therefore, this thesis investigates the use of hypergraph theory to model the RF environment and the spectrum allocation scheme. The hypergraph model was applied to an algorithm for spectrum sharing among 100 heterogeneous wireless networks, whose geo-locations were randomly and independently generated in a 50 km by 50 km area. Simulation results for spectrum utilisation performance have shown that the hypergraph-based model allocated channels, on average, to 8% more networks than the graph-based model. The results also show that, for the same RF environment, the hypergraph model requires up to 36% fewer channels to achieve, on average, 100% operational networks, than the graph model. The rate of growth of the running time of the hypergraph-based algorithm with respect to the input size is equal to the square of the input size, like the graph-based algorithm. Thus, the model achieved better performance at no additional time complexity

    Quality of service provision and capacity expansion through extended-DSA for 5G

    Full text link
    corecore