70,202 research outputs found

    Poster Abstracts

    Get PDF
    Contents: Lapsley, H., Nikora, L. W., & Black, R. Stigma and discrimination: Bicultural narratives of recovery from disabling mental health illness. Waitoki, M. Cultural Competency Training in Aotearoa. Can Multicultural Competency Training be Developed and Measured in a Bi-Cultural Context? Williams, M. H. Integration of Māori research methodologies with standard behavioural methodology: The example of precision teaching methods to attain behavioural fluency. Masters, B. Conceptualising a Kaupapa Māori Evaluation Methodology. Levy, M. Mental Health Research and Development Strategy. Pattison, R. How adolescents define emotional conflict between their parents.These are the poster abstracts from the Proceedings of the National Māori Graduates of Psychology Symposium 2002

    Addendum to Informatics for Health 2017: Advancing both science and practice

    Get PDF
    This article presents presentation and poster abstracts that were mistakenly omitted from the original publication

    Seasonal patterns of oral antihistamine and intranasal corticosteroid purchases from Australian community pharmacies : a retrospective observational study

    Get PDF
    Acknowledgments The abstract of this paper was presented at the Respiratory Effectiveness Group 2016 Annual Summit as a poster presentation with interim findings. The poster’s abstract was published in “Poster Abstracts” in The Journal of Thoracic Disease (Vol. 8, Supplement 5, 5 July 2016). http://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/8504.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

    Poster Abstracts

    Get PDF

    Abstracts from the Neurospora 2002 conference

    Get PDF
    Abstracts and Poster abstracts from the Neurospora 2002 conferenc

    Sigma Gamma Epsilon Undergraduate Research Poster Session

    Get PDF
    The Sigma Gamma Epsilon undergraduate research poster session will highlight recent and on-going student research. Abstracts for poster presentations will be available in the Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 2012 Annual Meeting, Charlotte, North Carolina, 4-7 November 2012

    Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The quality of oral and poster conference presentations differ. We hypothesized that the quality of reporting is better in oral abstracts than in poster abstracts at the American Burn Association (ABA) conference meeting.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All 511 abstracts (2000: N = 259, 2008: N = 252) from the ABA annual meetings in year 2000 and 2008 were screened. RCT's and obervational studies were analyzed by two independent examiners regarding study design and quality of reporting for randomized-controlled trials (RCT) by CONSORT criteria, observational studies by the STROBE criteria and additionally the Timmer instrument.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall, 13 RCT's in 2000 and 9 in 2008, 77 observational studies in 2000 and 98 in 2008 were identified. Of the presented abstracts, 5% (oral; 7%(n = 9) vs. poster; 3%(n = 4)) in 2000 and 4% ((oral; 5%(n = 7) vs. poster; 2%(n = 2)) in 2008 were randomized controlled trials. The amount of observational studies as well as experimental studies accepted for presentation was not significantly different between oral and poster in both years. Reporting quality of RCT was for oral vs. poster abstracts in 2000 (CONSORT; 7.2 ± 0.8 vs. 7 ± 0, p = 0.615, CI -0.72 to 1.16, Timmer; 7.8 ± 0.7 vs. 7.5 ± 0.6,) and 2008 (CONSORT; 7.2 ± 1.4 vs. 6.5 ± 1, Timmer; 9.7 ± 1.1 vs. 9.5 ± 0.7). While in 2000, oral and poster abstracts of observational studies were not significantly different for reporting quality according to STROBE (STROBE; 8.3 ± 1.7 vs. 8.9 ± 1.6, p = 0.977, CI -37.3 to 36.3, Timmer; 8.6 ± 1.5 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4, p = 0.712, CI -0.44 to 0.64), in 2008 oral observational abstracts were significantly better than posters (STROBE score; 9.4 ± 1.9 vs. 8.5 ± 2, p = 0.005, CI 0.28 to 1.54, Timmer; 9.4 ± 1.4 vs. 8.6 ± 1.7, p = 0.013, CI 0.32 to 1.28).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Poster abstract reporting quality at the American Burn Association annual meetings in 2000 and 2008 is not necessarily inferior to oral abstracts as far as study design and reporting quality of clinical trials are concerned. The primary hypothesis has to be rejected. However, endorsement for the comprehensive use of the CONSORT and STROBE criteria might further increase the quality of reporting ABA conference abstracts in the future.</p
    • 

    corecore