9,734 research outputs found
Why the Economics Profession Must Actively Participate in the Privacy Protection Debate
When Google or the U.S. Census Bureau publish detailed statistics on browsing habits or neighborhood characteristics, some privacy is lost for everybody while supplying public information. To date, economists have not focused on the privacy loss inherent in data publication. In their stead, these issues have been advanced almost exclusively by computer scientists who are primarily interested in technical problems associated with protecting privacy. Economists should join the discussion, first, to determine where to balance privacy protection against data quality; a social choice problem. Furthermore, economists must ensure new privacy models preserve the validity of public data for economic research
Quantum states prepared by realistic entanglement swapping
Entanglement swapping between photon pairs is a fundamental building block in
schemes using quantum relays or quantum repeaters to overcome the range limits
of long-distance quantum key distribution. We develop a closed-form solution
for the actual quantum states prepared by realistic entanglement swapping,
which takes into account experimental deficiencies due to inefficient
detectors, detector dark counts, and multiphoton-pair contributions of
parametric down-conversion sources. We investigate how the entanglement present
in the final state of the remaining modes is affected by the real-world
imperfections. To test the predictions of our theory, comparison with
previously published experimental entanglement swapping is provided.Comment: 44 pages, 7 figures, Published with minor changes in Phys. Rev.
Economic Analysis and Statistical Disclosure Limitation
This paper explores the consequences for economic research of methods used by data publishers to protect the privacy of their respondents. We review the concept of statistical disclosure limitation for an audience of economists who may be unfamiliar with these methods. We characterize what it means for statistical disclosure limitation to be ignorable. When it is not ignorable, we consider the effects of statistical disclosure limitation for a variety of research designs common in applied economic research. Because statistical agencies do not always report the methods they use to protect confidentiality, we also characterize settings in which statistical disclosure limitation methods are discoverable; that is, they can be learned from the released data. We conclude with advice for researchers, journal editors, and statistical agencies
Fast Face-swap Using Convolutional Neural Networks
We consider the problem of face swapping in images, where an input identity
is transformed into a target identity while preserving pose, facial expression,
and lighting. To perform this mapping, we use convolutional neural networks
trained to capture the appearance of the target identity from an unstructured
collection of his/her photographs.This approach is enabled by framing the face
swapping problem in terms of style transfer, where the goal is to render an
image in the style of another one. Building on recent advances in this area, we
devise a new loss function that enables the network to produce highly
photorealistic results. By combining neural networks with simple pre- and
post-processing steps, we aim at making face swap work in real-time with no
input from the user
A New Method for Protecting Interrelated Time Series with Bayesian Prior Distributions and Synthetic Data
Organizations disseminate statistical summaries of administrative data via the Web for unrestricted public use. They balance the trade-off between confidentiality protection and inference quality. Recent developments in disclosure avoidance techniques include the incorporation of synthetic data, which capture the essential features of underlying data by releasing altered data generated from a posterior predictive distribution. The United States Census Bureau collects millions of interrelated time series micro-data that are hierarchical and contain many zeros and suppressions. Rule-based disclosure avoidance techniques often require the suppression of count data for small magnitudes and the modification of data based on a small number of entities. Motivated by this problem, we use zero-inflated extensions of Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Models (BGLMM) with privacy-preserving prior distributions to develop methods for protecting and releasing synthetic data from time series about thousands of small groups of entities without suppression based on the of magnitudes or number of entities. We find that as the prior distributions of the variance components in the BGLMM become more precise toward zero, confidentiality protection increases and inference quality deteriorates. We evaluate our methodology using a strict privacy measure, empirical differential privacy, and a newly defined risk measure, Probability of Range Identification (PoRI), which directly measures attribute disclosure risk. We illustrate our results with the U.S. Census Bureau’s Quarterly Workforce Indicators
An Alternative Conception of Tree-Adjoining Derivation
The precise formulation of derivation for tree-adjoining grammars has
important ramifications for a wide variety of uses of the formalism, from
syntactic analysis to semantic interpretation and statistical language
modeling. We argue that the definition of tree-adjoining derivation must be
reformulated in order to manifest the proper linguistic dependencies in
derivations. The particular proposal is both precisely characterizable through
a definition of TAG derivations as equivalence classes of ordered derivation
trees, and computationally operational, by virtue of a compilation to linear
indexed grammars together with an efficient algorithm for recognition and
parsing according to the compiled grammar.Comment: 33 page
- …