11 research outputs found

    Step by Step Implementation of DSRM for Personalization of Reading

    Get PDF
    This paper aims to discuss step-by-step activities of the implementation of Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) in the development of Personalization teaching and learning materials for children. DSRM is adapted in the development of personalized teaching and learning materials due to its potential to provide specific guidelines based on specific outcomes. This paper revealed the potential of DSRM as a reliable and comprehensive methodology that leads the developer on step by step processes to perform the development. Apart from that this study provides details description on the development of personalized teaching and learning materials that is successfully developed using the DSRM methodology as guidelines

    The Impact of Vocabulary Assessment and Personalized Feedback on Studentsโ€™ Vocabulary Mastery

    Get PDF
    This review explores the synergy between vocabulary assessment and personalized feedback in supporting studentsโ€™ vocabulary mastery and enhancing their learning experiences. Vocabulary plays a crucial role in academic success, serving as the cornerstone of comprehension and communication. Therefore, accurate vocabulary assessment and effective feedback mechanisms are imperative. The paper outlines the significance of individualized learning, emphasizing the need to recognize studentsโ€™ unique learning styles and tailor feedback accordingly, and discusses the transformative role of technology in facilitating innovative assessment and feedback approaches. However, the implementation of these approaches encounters various challenges, including technical barriers, logistical hurdles, and resistance from educators and students. The current body of research, while insightful, also presents limitations such as restricted scope, scale, and unaddressed gaps in knowledge. Despite these challenges, the integration of vocabulary assessment and personalized feedback offers promising prospects for enhancing studentsโ€™ learning outcomes and motivation. Future research needs to focus on overcoming existing challenges and expanding the understanding of this integrative educational approach to benefit diverse student populations

    Interest-based Language Teaching: Enhancing Studentsโ€™ Interest and Achievement in L2 Reading

    Get PDF
    This study reports the findings of the research conducted on the effects of Interest-Based Language Teaching (IBLT) on Persian studentsโ€™ interest in L2 learning, and their achievement in reading comprehension. With the aim of improving L2 learning in the university level, the study investigated whether selecting instructional materials based on learnersโ€™ interest areas could impact their interest in language learning. Furthermore, it examined whether selecting instructional materials based on interest would have any influence on learnersโ€™ performance in L2 reading. It also examined any significant differences between the learners with high and low L2 reading levels in terms of interest. The participants were sixty first-year nursing students in a nursing college. Both questionnaires and tests were employed to collect the data. The collected data were closely examined and analyzed using independent-samples t-test. The results revealed that (1) personalizing the materials could make a significant contribution to the development and enhancement of students' interest level in L2 learning; (2) selecting the instructional materials based on learnersโ€™ interest areas could improve their performance in L2 reading comprehension; and (3) in using IBLT, there was no significant difference between learners with different levels of reading proficiency in learning the course materials

    The Effects of Group-Based Context Personalization on Learning Outcomes and Motivation

    Get PDF
    The rise of online course enrollments in higher education has highlighted the need to establish and validate effective online instructional strategies focused on improving learning outcomes and affective responses towards instruction. One such strategy, group-based context personalization, frames instructional materials within contexts relevant to shared interests among groups of students. This study sought to investigate the effects of group-based context personalization on learning outcomes and motivation towards the instruction when materials were contextualized based on a learnerโ€™s academic major. This study employed a true experimental design to explore the effects of group-based context personalization on learning outcomes and motivation for 20 undergraduate fashion merchandising majors enrolled in a four-year institution in the East Central Region of the U.S. Participants were randomly assigned to either the personalization or non-personalization group. The personalization group received an online unit on fair use and copyright contextualized with fashion merchandising examples, while the non-personalization group received the same instructional materials but with general, education-related examples. Both groups completed Kellerโ€™s (2010) Instructional Materials Motivation Survey and a posttest that consisted of recall, general transfer, and fashion merchandising-related transfer questions. This study found no significant between-groups differences on learning outcomes or motivation towards the instruction, though the within-groups posttest performance on general education questions did approach significance over performance on fashion merchandising transfer questions. Suggestions for future research and implementation of group-based context personalization instructional strategies are provided

    ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ธ์‹

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฌ๋ฒ”๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ต์œกํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ์กฐ์˜ํ™˜.์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ(AI)์˜ ๋„์ž…์ด ํฐ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋Œ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ AI ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ํ•™์Šต ๋ถ„์„์ด ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ ์ง€๊ธˆ๊ป ์‹คํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์› ๋˜ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต(personalized learning)๊ณผ ์ ์‘์  ํ•™์Šต(adaptive learning)์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ(AI-based education platform)์€ ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ํ–‰๋™ ์ถ”์  ๋“ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ง„๋‹จ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ ๋’ค ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ•™์Šต์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ธ์ง€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋งž๋Š” ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต์ž์›๊ณผ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ ๊ต์‚ฌ์™€ ํ•™์ƒ์—๊ฒŒ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ•™์Šต์— ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ๋‚˜ ์—„๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•ด์™”์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋“œ๋ฌผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ต์œก ๋„์ž…์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์˜ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ์˜๊ฒฌ์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์˜ ์ธ์‹์„ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„๋ž˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์œก์— ํ™œ์šฉ ์žˆ์–ด ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์žฅ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ๊ณผ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํ™œ๋™ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ์…‹์งธ, ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์œก์— ๋„์ž…ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€? ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‹ฌ์ธต ๋ฉด๋‹ด์„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฉด๋‹ด ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋˜ ๋ˆˆ๋ฉ์ดํ‘œ์ง‘๋ฒ• (snowball sampling)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ค‘๊ตญ ์ค‘ํ•™๊ต ๊ต์‚ฌ 14๋ช…์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ ์ •๋œ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ 1์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ •๋„ ๋ฉด๋‹ด์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋…น์Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฉด๋‹ด์ด ๋๋‚œ ํ›„ ๋…น์Œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ „์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฃผ์ œ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฉด๋‹ด ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ฝ”๋“œ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฉด๋‹ด ์ž๋ฃŒ ์†์—์„œ ์ฃผ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ 2๋ฒˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ํ™œ์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํ•™์Šตํ™œ๋™ ๋‚ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™œ๋™์ด๋ก ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ‹€๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 1์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 4๊ฐœ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 2์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 6๊ฐœ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ œ 3์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ 4๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์žฅ์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ฆ‰๊ฐ์ ์ธ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ์ œ๊ณต, ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ์ง€์›, ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์—…๋ฌด๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ์ž์›์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต ํ™œ๋™๊ณผ ์ƒ์ถฉ๋œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์ถ”์ฒœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ฐจ๋ณ„ํ™”๋œ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์ž˜ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•™์Šต ์ž์›์„ ์ž˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋ถˆํŽธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ง€์ ์žฌ์‚ฐ๊ถŒ์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ทœ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ•™๋ถ€๋ชจ๋“ค์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ๋‚จ์šฉ๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ ฅ ์ €ํ•˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์šฐ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ ์ค‘๊ตญ์˜ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ฌธํ™”์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ต์œก ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์˜ ๊ธ€์”จ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•™๊ต ๋‚ด ์ „์ž๊ธฐ๊ธฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ œํ•œ๋„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘์˜ ์ง€์†์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ์œ„์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ทœ์น™ ๋งˆ๋ จ๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์™„ํ™”๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๊ณผ์ •์— ๊ต์œก ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ตญ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ธ์‹์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๊ต์ˆ˜ํ•™์Šต์—์„œ์˜ ์žฅ์ ๊ณผ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ๋กœ ๋„์ž…๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ทœ์น™, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ต์œก ๊ณตํ•™์˜ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ทœ๋ฒ”๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ต์œก ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์œก ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๋„์ž…์— ํ™œ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์—๋„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.In recent years, the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has attracted widespread attention. In particular, the AI-based education platform based on the combination of AI technology and learning analysis brings new light to the long-standing difficulties in personalized learning and adaptive learning. The AI-based education platform analyzes learners' characteristics by collecting their data and tracking their learning behavior. It then generates cognitive diagnosis for learners and provides them with personalized learning resources and adaptive feedback that match their cognitive level based on systematic analysis. With the help of the AI-based education platform, teachers and students can get real-time educational data and analysis result๏ผŒas well as the feedback and treatment corresponding to the results. Previous studies have already demonstrated and proved its positive significance to personalized learning. However, these studies mostly start from a model development perspective or in a rigorous laboratory environment. There has been little research on teachers' perceptions of AI-based education platform. As a direct user of AI educational technologies, teachers' perceptions and suggestions are vital for introducing AIEd in education. In this study, the researcher explored teachers' perceptions of using AI-based education platform in teaching. The study conducted qualitative research to address the following research questions: 1) How do Chinese teachers perceive the advantages of AI-based education platforms for teaching and learning in secondary school? 2) How do Chinese teachers perceive the contradictions between AI-based education platforms and the secondary school system? 3๏ผ‰How do Chinese teachers suggest applying AI-based education platforms in secondary school? And it referred to the in-depth online interview with Chinese teachers who had experience with AI-based education platform. Interview questions were constructed through the literature review, and 14 secondary school teachers were selected by the snowball sampling method. The interviews lasted for an average of one hour per teacher and were transcribed from the audio recordings to text documents when finished. Afterward, the data were analyzed using thematic analysis, including generating initial codes, searching and reviewing the categories, and deriving the themes finally. Notably, for research question two, the researcher used the activity theory framework to analyze the contradictions among the use of the AI-based education platform and the various elements of the teaching and learning activities. Finally, four themes for research question 1, six themes for research question 2, and four themes for research question 3 were derived. As for the advantages, teachers believe that AI-based education platforms can provide instant feedback, targeted and systematic teaching support, and reduce teachers' workload. At the same time, AI-based education platforms can also integrate teaching resources in different areas. Teachers also recognized that the AI-based education platforms might trigger contradictions in existing teaching activities. They are aware of the situation that the recommended model of the AI-based education platform is not suitable for all levels of students; that a large number of learning resources are not classified properly enough to meet the needs of teachers, and that there lack clear rules and regulations to protect teachers' intellectual property rights when using the platform. Besides, parents are also concerned about the potential risk of internet addiction and vision problems using AI-based education platforms. Moreover, the use of the AI-based education platform may also affect students' ability to write Chinese characters due to the socio-historical background and educational characteristics in China. Furthermore, the restricted use of electronic devices on campus may also impact the consistent and effective education data collection. Teachers believe that these problems can be solved by improving rules and AI technology. Moreover, to make the platform more in line with the actual teaching requirements, teachers and education experts can also be involved in the development process of AI-based education platform. This study explored how Chinese teachers perceive the AI-based education platform and found that the AI-based education platform was conducive to personalized teaching and learning. At the same time, this study put forward some suggestions from the perspective of rules, AI technology, and educational technology, hoping to provide a good value for the future large-scale introduction of AI-based education platforms in education.CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Problem Statement 1 1.2. Purpose of Research 7 1.3. Definition of Terms 8 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1. AI in Education 10 2.1.1 AI for Learning and Teaching 10 2.1.2 AI-based Education Platform 14 2.1.3 Teachers' Perception on AI-based Education Platform 18 2.2. Activity Theory 20 CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHOD 23 3.1. Research Design 23 3.2. Participants 25 3.3. Instrumentation 26 3.3.1 Potential Value of AI System in Education 26 3.4. Data Collection 33 3.5. Data Analysis 34 CHAPTER 4. FINDINGS 36 4.1. Advantages of Using AI-based Education Platform 36 4.1.1 Instant Feedback 37 4.1.2 Targeted and Systematic Teaching Support 42 4.1.3 Educational Resources Sharing 46 4.1.4 Reducing Workload 49 4.2. Tensions of Using AI-based Education Platform 51 4.2.1 Inadequately Meet the Needs of Teachers 52 4.2.2 Failure to Satisfy Low and High Achievers 54 4.2.3 Intellectual Property Violation 56 4.2.4 Guardian's Concern 57 4.2.5 School Rules about the Use of Electronic Devices 58 4.2.6 Implication for Chinese Character Education 59 4.3. Suggestion of Using AI-based Education Platform 61 4.3.1 Improving Rules of Using the AI-based Education Platform 61 4.3.2 Improving Rules of Protecting Teachers Right 62 4.3.3 Improving AI Technology 64 4.3.4 Participatory Design 66 CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 68 5.1. Discussion 68 5.2. Conclusion 72 REFERENCE 75 APPENDIX 1 98 APPENDIX 2 100 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 112Maste

    The Effects of Individualized Literacy Interventions on Reading Motivation and Achievement for a Student with Cognitive Disabilities

    Get PDF
    This study was a case study which focused on improving reading achievement and reading motivation for a student attending a large mid-West urban school district. The student was in second grade at and is diagnosed with a mild cognitive disability. The intervention consisted of ten sessions, for 60 minutes. The sessions focused on research-based methods to increase reading motivation and achievement: content goals, student choice, and hands on activities. Pre and post data was collected on the students reading motivation, reading achievement, performance in the literacy sessions, and classroom behaviors. The results of the study indicated that the interventions had an effect on the students motivation as measured in a motivation survey, behavior in sessions and classroom behavior. In addition, the student\u27s reading achievement increased through the study. At the end the student was able to move from a frustration level to an instruction level on primer text

    THE EFFECT OF DIGITAL WORD STUDY ON FIFTH GRADERSโ€™ VOCABULARY ACQUISITION, RETENTION, AND MOTIVATION: A MIXED METHODS APPROACH

    Get PDF
    Vocabulary and comprehension are so inextricably linked that it ensures the necessity of researchers and teachers to determine the most effective method of vocabulary instruction. Our nation's children are still victims of what has been termed the vocabulary gap (Biemiller & Boote, 2006). This vocabulary gap, according to a large body of research (Chall, Jacobs, & Baldwin, 1990; Chall & Jacobs, 2003; Hart & Risley, 1995), is largely attributed to students' socioeconomic status. With the increasing digitization of education and proliferation of technology in our culture, students are gaining access to additional learning tools (Collins & Halverson, 2009). Vocabulary is a dimension of education that can be mediated through digital tools such as the Internet. With a global emphasis on the development of 21st century skills, researchers and teachers need to explore new, digital means of teaching vocabulary. The purpose of this study was to explore an alternative method of vocabulary instruction, using digital technologies. The expectation was that digital vocabulary instruction possessed the potential to contribute a means to address the vocabulary gap and provide all students with the mediating tools to improve their vocabularies. This study took place over eight-weeks during the spring semester of 2012 and used a mixed-methods design. Participants included two fifth grade teachers and 43 fifth grade students. The intact classes each had access to two types of vocabulary instruction on Greek and Latin roots: a digital word wall and a non-digital word wall. Group A began instruction with the digital word wall; group B began instruction with the non-digital word wall. At the end of a three week period, the instructional methods were switched and group A was instructed with the non-digital word wall while group B was instructed with the digital word wall. The study took place in a public elementary school located in a suburban area outside of a large city in the southeastern United States. The students learned three new Greek and Latin roots or prefixes per week. Interviews with students and teachers were conducted and thematically analyzed. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine significant differences in students' vocabulary growth as was measured by multiple assessments. While further research is needed, an analysis of the data indicates that the digital word wall is a viable vocabulary instructional method to be added to teachers' repertoires

    Understanding and Supporting Vocabulary Learners via Machine Learning on Behavioral and Linguistic Data

    Full text link
    This dissertation presents various machine learning applications for predicting different cognitive states of students while they are using a vocabulary tutoring system, DSCoVAR. We conduct four studies, each of which includes a comprehensive analysis of behavioral and linguistic data and provides data-driven evidence for designing personalized features for the system. The first study presents how behavioral and linguistic interactions from the vocabulary tutoring system can be used to predict students' off-task states. The study identifies which predictive features from interaction signals are more important and examines different types of off-task behaviors. The second study investigates how to automatically evaluate students' partial word knowledge from open-ended responses to definition questions. We present a technique that augments modern word-embedding techniques with a classic semantic differential scaling method from cognitive psychology. We then use this interpretable semantic scale method for predicting students' short- and long-term learning. The third and fourth studies show how to develop a model that can generate more efficient training curricula for both human and machine vocabulary learners. The third study illustrates a deep-learning model to score sentences for a contextual vocabulary learning curriculum. We use pre-trained language models, such as ELMo or BERT, and an additional attention layer to capture how the context words are less or more important with respect to the meaning of the target word. The fourth study examines how the contextual informativeness model, originally designed to develop curricula for human vocabulary learning, can also be used for developing curricula for various word embedding models. We identify sentences predicted as low informative for human learners are also less helpful for machine learning algorithms. Having a rich understanding of user behaviors, responses, and learning stimuli is imperative to develop an intelligent online system. Our studies demonstrate interpretable methods with cross-disciplinary approaches to understand various cognitive states of students during learning. The analysis results provide data-driven evidence for designing personalized features that can maximize learning outcomes. Datasets we collected from the studies will be shared publicly to promote future studies related to online tutoring systems. And these findings can also be applied to represent different user states observed in other online systems. In the future, we believe our findings can help to implement a more personalized vocabulary learning system, to develop a system that uses non-English texts or different types of inputs, and to investigate how the machine learning outputs interact with students.PHDInformationUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162999/1/sjnam_1.pd
    corecore