Data allocation in disk arrays with multiple raid levels

There has been an explosion in the amount of generated data, which has to be stored reliably because it is not easily reproducible. Some datasets require frequent read and write access. like online transaction processing applications. Others just need to be stored safely and read once in a while, as in data mining. This different access requirements can be solved by using the RAID (redundant array of inexpensive disks) paradigm. i.e., RAIDi for the first situation and RAID5 for the second situation. Furthermore rather than providing two disk arrays with RAID 1 and RAID5 capabilities, a controller can be postulated to emulate both. It is referred as a heterogeneous disk array (HDA). Dedicating a subset of disks to RAID 1 results in poor disk utilization, since RAIDi vs RAID5 capacity and bandwidth requirements are not known a priori. Balancing disk loads when disk space is shared among allocation requests, referred to as virtual arrays - VAs poses a difficult problem. RAIDi disk arrays have a higher access rate per gigabyte than RAID5 disk arrays. Allocating more VAs while keeping disk utilizations balanced and within acceptable bounds is the goal of this study. Given its size and access rate a VA\u27s width or the number of its Virtual Disks -VDs is determined. VDs allocations on physical disks using vector-packing heuristics, with disk capacity and bandwidth as the two dimensions are shown to be the best. An allocation is acceptable if it does riot exceed the disk capacity and overload disks even in the presence of disk failures. When disk bandwidth rather than capacity is the bottleneck, the clustered RAID paradigm is applied, which offers a tradeoff between disk space and bandwidth. Another scenario is also considered where the RAID level is determined by a classification algorithm utilizing the access characteristics of the VA, i.e., fractions of small versus large access and the fraction of write versus read accesses. The effect of RAID 1 organization on its reliability and performance is studied too. The effect of disk failures on the X-code two disk failure tolerant array is analyzed and it is shown that the load across disks is highly unbalanced unless in an NxN array groups of N stripes are randomly rotated

RAIDX: RAID EXTENDED FOR HETEROGENEOUS ARRAYS

The computer hard drive market has diversified with the establishment of solid state disks (SSDs) as an alternative to magnetic hard disks (HDDs). Each hard drive technology has its advantages: the SSDs are faster than HDDs but the HDDs are cheaper. Our goal is to construct a parallel storage system with HDDs and SSDs such that the parallel system is as fast as the SSDs. Achieving this goal is challenging since the slow HDDs store more data and become bottlenecks, while the SSDs remain idle. RAIDX is a parallel storage system designed for disks of different speeds, capacities and technologies. The RAIDX hardware consists of an array of disks; the RAIDX software consists of data structures and algorithms that allow the disks to be viewed as a single storage unit that has capacity equal to the sum of the capacities of its disks, failure rate lower than the failure rate of its individual disks, and speeds close to that of its faster disks. RAIDX achieves its performance goals with the aid of its novel parallel data organization technique that allows storage data to be moved on the fly without impacting the upper level file system. We show that storage data accesses satisfy the locality of reference principle, whereby only a small fraction of storage data are accessed frequently. RAIDX has a monitoring program that identifies frequently accessed blocks and a migration program that moves frequently accessed blocks to faster disks. The faster disks are caches that store the solo copy of frequently accessed data. Experimental evaluation has shown that a HDD+SSD RAIDX array is as fast as an all-SSD array when the workload shows locality of reference