15 research outputs found
Pathwidth and nonrepetitive list coloring
A vertex coloring of a graph is nonrepetitive if there is no path in the
graph whose first half receives the same sequence of colors as the second half.
While every tree can be nonrepetitively colored with a bounded number of colors
(4 colors is enough), Fiorenzi, Ochem, Ossona de Mendez, and Zhu recently
showed that this does not extend to the list version of the problem, that is,
for every there is a tree that is not nonrepetitively
-choosable. In this paper we prove the following positive result, which
complements the result of Fiorenzi et al.: There exists a function such
that every tree of pathwidth is nonrepetitively -choosable. We also
show that such a property is specific to trees by constructing a family of
pathwidth-2 graphs that are not nonrepetitively -choosable for any fixed
.Comment: v2: Minor changes made following helpful comments by the referee
Nonrepetitive Colouring via Entropy Compression
A vertex colouring of a graph is \emph{nonrepetitive} if there is no path
whose first half receives the same sequence of colours as the second half. A
graph is nonrepetitively -choosable if given lists of at least colours
at each vertex, there is a nonrepetitive colouring such that each vertex is
coloured from its own list. It is known that every graph with maximum degree
is -choosable, for some constant . We prove this result
with (ignoring lower order terms). We then prove that every subdivision
of a graph with sufficiently many division vertices per edge is nonrepetitively
5-choosable. The proofs of both these results are based on the Moser-Tardos
entropy-compression method, and a recent extension by Grytczuk, Kozik and Micek
for the nonrepetitive choosability of paths. Finally, we prove that every graph
with pathwidth is nonrepetitively -colourable.Comment: v4: Minor changes made following helpful comments by the referee
Anagram-free Graph Colouring
An anagram is a word of the form where is a non-empty word and
is a permutation of . We study anagram-free graph colouring and give bounds
on the chromatic number. Alon et al. (2002) asked whether anagram-free
chromatic number is bounded by a function of the maximum degree. We answer this
question in the negative by constructing graphs with maximum degree 3 and
unbounded anagram-free chromatic number. We also prove upper and lower bounds
on the anagram-free chromatic number of trees in terms of their radius and
pathwidth. Finally, we explore extensions to edge colouring and
-anagram-free colouring.Comment: Version 2: Changed 'abelian square' to 'anagram' for consistency with
'Anagram-free colourings of graphs' by Kam\v{c}ev, {\L}uczak, and Sudakov.
Minor changes based on referee feedbac
New Bounds for Facial Nonrepetitive Colouring
We prove that the facial nonrepetitive chromatic number of any outerplanar
graph is at most 11 and of any planar graph is at most 22.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figure
Notes on Graph Product Structure Theory
It was recently proved that every planar graph is a subgraph of the strong
product of a path and a graph with bounded treewidth. This paper surveys
generalisations of this result for graphs on surfaces, minor-closed classes,
various non-minor-closed classes, and graph classes with polynomial growth. We
then explore how graph product structure might be applicable to more broadly
defined graph classes. In particular, we characterise when a graph class
defined by a cartesian or strong product has bounded or polynomial expansion.
We then explore graph product structure theorems for various geometrically
defined graph classes, and present several open problems.Comment: 19 pages, 0 figure
Planar graphs have bounded nonrepetitive chromatic number
A colouring of a graph isnonrepetitiveif for every path of even order, thesequence of colours on the first half of the path is different from the sequence of colours onthe second half. We show that planar graphs have nonrepetitive colourings with a boundednumber of colours, thus proving a conjecture of Alon, Grytczuk, Hałuszczak and Riordan(2002). We also generalise this result for graphs of bounded Euler genus, graphs excluding afixed minor, and graphs excluding a fixed topological minor