2 research outputs found

    Partition bound is quadratically tight for product distributions

    Get PDF
    Let f:{0,1}n×{0,1}n{0,1}f : \{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\} be a 2-party function. For every product distribution μ\mu on {0,1}n×{0,1}n\{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^n, we show that CC0.49μ(f)=O((logprt1/8(f)loglogprt1/8(f))2),\mathsf{CC}^\mu_{0.49}(f) = O\left(\left(\log \mathsf{prt}_{1/8}(f) \cdot \log \log \mathsf{prt}_{1/8}(f)\right)^2\right), where CCεμ(f)\mathsf{CC}^\mu_\varepsilon(f) is the distributional communication complexity of ff with error at most ε\varepsilon under the distribution μ\mu and prt1/8(f)\mathsf{prt}_{1/8}(f) is the {\em partition bound} of ff, as defined by Jain and Klauck [{\em Proc. 25th CCC}, 2010]. We also prove a similar bound in terms of IC1/8(f)\mathsf{IC}_{1/8}(f), the {\em information complexity} of ff, namely, CC0.49μ(f)=O((IC1/8(f)logIC1/8(f))2).\mathsf{CC}^\mu_{0.49}(f) = O\left(\left(\mathsf{IC}_{1/8}(f) \cdot \log \mathsf{IC}_{1/8}(f)\right)^2\right). The latter bound was recently and independently established by Kol [{\em Proc. 48th STOC}, 2016] using a different technique. We show a similar result for query complexity under product distributions. Let g:{0,1}n{0,1}g : \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\} be a function. For every bit-wise product distribution μ\mu on {0,1}n\{0,1\}^n, we show that QC0.49μ(g)=O((logqprt1/8(g)loglogqprt1/8(g))2),\mathsf{QC}^\mu_{0.49}(g) = O\left(\left( \log \mathsf{qprt}_{1/8}(g) \cdot \log \log\mathsf{qprt}_{1/8}(g) \right)^2 \right), where QCεμ(g)\mathsf{QC}^\mu_{\varepsilon}(g) is the distributional query complexity of ff with error at most ε\varepsilon under the distribution μ\mu and qprt1/8(g))\mathsf{qprt}_{1/8}(g)) is the {\em query partition bound} of the function gg. Partition bounds were introduced (in both communication complexity and query complexity models) to provide LP-based lower bounds for randomized communication complexity and randomized query complexity. Our results demonstrate that these lower bounds are polynomially tight for {\em product} distributions.Comment: The previous version of the paper erroneously stated the main result in terms of relaxed partition number instead of partition numbe

    Quadratically Tight Relations for Randomized Query Complexity

    Full text link
    Let f:{0,1}n{0,1}f:\{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\} be a Boolean function. The certificate complexity C(f)C(f) is a complexity measure that is quadratically tight for the zero-error randomized query complexity R0(f)R_0(f): C(f)R0(f)C(f)2C(f) \leq R_0(f) \leq C(f)^2. In this paper we study a new complexity measure that we call expectational certificate complexity EC(f)EC(f), which is also a quadratically tight bound on R0(f)R_0(f): EC(f)R0(f)=O(EC(f)2)EC(f) \leq R_0(f) = O(EC(f)^2). We prove that EC(f)C(f)EC(f)2EC(f) \leq C(f) \leq EC(f)^2 and show that there is a quadratic separation between the two, thus EC(f)EC(f) gives a tighter upper bound for R0(f)R_0(f). The measure is also related to the fractional certificate complexity FC(f)FC(f) as follows: FC(f)EC(f)=O(FC(f)3/2)FC(f) \leq EC(f) = O(FC(f)^{3/2}). This also connects to an open question by Aaronson whether FC(f)FC(f) is a quadratically tight bound for R0(f)R_0(f), as EC(f)EC(f) is in fact a relaxation of FC(f)FC(f). In the second part of the work, we upper bound the distributed query complexity Dϵμ(f)D^\mu_\epsilon(f) for product distributions μ\mu by the square of the query corruption bound (corrϵ(f)\mathrm{corr}_\epsilon(f)) which improves upon a result of Harsha, Jain and Radhakrishnan [2015]. A similar statement for communication complexity is open.Comment: 14 page
    corecore