Visualization of program performance on concurrent computers

A distributed memory concurrent computer (such as a hypercube computer) is inherently a complex system involving the collective and simultaneous interaction of many entities engaged in computation and communication activities. Program performance evaluation in concurrent computer systems requires methods and tools for observing, analyzing, and displaying system performance. This dissertation describes a methodology for collecting and displaying, via a unique graphical approach, performance measurement information from (possibly large) concurrent computer systems. Performance data are generated and collected via instrumentation. The data are then reduced via conventional cluster analysis techniques and converted into a pictorial form to highlight important aspects of program states during execution. Local and summary statistics are calculated. Included in the suite of defined metrics are measures for quantifying and comparing amounts of computation and communication. A novel kind of data plot is introduced to visually display both temporal and spatial information describing system activity. Phenomena such as hot spots of activity are easily observed, and in some cases, patterns inherent in the application algorithms being studied are highly visible. The approach also provides a framework for a visual solution to the problem of mapping a given parallel algorithm to an underlying parallel machine. A prototype implementation applied to several case studies is presented to demonstrate the feasibility and power of the approach

Do Hypercubes Sort Faster Than Tree Machines?

We develop a balanced, parallel quicksort algorithm for a hypercube and compare it with a similar algorithm for a binary tree machine. The performance of the hypercube algorithm is measured on a Computing Surface

Lightweight MPI Communicators with Applications to Perfectly Balanced Quicksort

MPI uses the concept of communicators to connect groups of processes. It provides nonblocking collective operations on communicators to overlap communication and computation. Flexible algorithms demand flexible communicators. E.g., a process can work on different subproblems within different process groups simultaneously, new process groups can be created, or the members of a process group can change. Depending on the number of communicators, the time for communicator creation can drastically increase the running time of the algorithm. Furthermore, a new communicator synchronizes all processes as communicator creation routines are blocking collective operations. We present RBC, a communication library based on MPI, that creates range-based communicators in constant time without communication. These RBC communicators support (non)blocking point-to-point communication as well as (non)blocking collective operations. Our experiments show that the library reduces the time to create a new communicator by a factor of more than 400 whereas the running time of collective operations remains about the same. We propose Janus Quicksort, a distributed sorting algorithm that avoids any load imbalances. We improved the performance of this algorithm by a factor of 15 for moderate inputs by using RBC communicators. Finally, we discuss different approaches to bring nonblocking (local) communicator creation of lightweight (range-based) communicators into MPI

Parallel sorting by regular sampling

ABSTRACT A new parallel sorting algorithm suitable for MIMD multiprocessors is presented. The algorithm reduces memory and bus contention, which many parallel sorting algorithms suffer from, by using a regular sampling of the data to ensure good pivot selection. For n data elements to be sorted and p processors, when n ≥ p 3 the algorithm is shown to be asymptotically optimal. In theory, the algorithm is within a factor of two of achieving ideal load balancing. In practice, there is almost perfect partitioning of work. On a variety of shared and distributed memory machines, the algorithm achieves better than half-linear speedups. -4

Parallel Divide and Conquer

We develop a generic divide and conquer algorithm for a parallel tree machine. From the generic algorithm we derive balanced, parallel versions of quicksort and the fast Fourier transform by substitution of data types, variables and statements. The performance of these algorithms is analyzed and measured on a Computing Surface configured as a tree machine with distributed memory

A full parallel Quicksort algorithm for multicore processors

The problem addressed in this paper is that we want to sort an integer array a[] of length n in parallel on a multi core machine with p cores using Quicksort. Amdahl’s law tells us that the inherent sequential part of any algorithm will in the end dominate and limit the speedup we get from parallelisation. This paper introduces ParaQuick, a full parallel quicksort algorithm for use on an ordinary shared memory multi core machine that has just a few simple statements in its sequential part. It can be seen as an improvement over traditional parallelization of the Quicksort algorithm, where one follows the sequential algorithm and substitute recursive calls with the creation of parallel threads for these calls in the top of the recursion tree. The ParaQuick algorithm, starts with k parallel threads, where k is a multiple of p (here k = 8*p) in a k way partition of the original array with the same pivot value, and hence we get 2k partitioned areas in the first pass. We then calculate where the pivot index, the division between the small and large elements if this had been ordinary sequential Quicksort partition. In full parallel we then swap all small elements to the right of this pivot index with the large elements to the left of this pivot index – these two ‘displaced’ sets are by definition of equal size. We can then recursively with half of the threads now do the left part, and with the other half of the threads the right part (more details and synchronization considerations in the paper). Finally, when there is only one thread left working on one such area, sequential Quicksort and Insertionsort are used, as in the traditional way of doing parallel Quicksort. In the last part of the paper, this new algorithm is empirically tested against two other algorithms and Arrays.sort from the Java library. Five different distributions of the numbers to be sorted end three different machines with p = 2(4 hyper threaded), 4(8) and 32(64) are tested. Finally, conclusions are presented and an explanation is given why this ParaQuick algorithm for large values of n and some distributions is so much faster than a traditional parallelisation