4,091 research outputs found
LevioSA: Lightweight Secure Arithmetic Computation
We study the problem of secure two-party computation of arithmetic circuits in the presence of active (``malicious\u27\u27) parties. This problem is motivated by privacy-preserving numerical computations, such as ones arising in the context of machine learning training and classification, as well as in threshold cryptographic schemes.
In this work, we design, optimize, and implement an actively secure protocol for secure two-party arithmetic computation. A distinctive feature of our protocol is that it can make a fully modular black-box use of any passively secure implementation of oblivious linear function evaluation (OLE). OLE is a commonly used primitive for secure arithmetic computation, analogously to the role of oblivious transfer in secure computation for Boolean circuits.
For typical (large but not-too-narrow) circuits, our protocol requires roughly 4 invocations of passively secure OLE per multiplication gate. This significantly improves over the recent TinyOLE protocol (Dottling et al., ACM CCS 2017), which requires 22 invocations of actively secure OLE in general, or 44 invocations of a specific code-based passively secure OLE.
Our protocol follows the high level approach of the IPS compiler (Ishai et al., CRYPTO 2008, TCC 2009), optimizing it in several ways. In particular, we adapt optimization ideas that were used in the context of the practical zero-knowledge argument system Ligero (Ames et al., ACM CCS 2017) to the more general setting of secure computation, and explore the possibility of boosting efficiency by employing a ``leaky\u27\u27 passively secure OLE protocol. The latter is motivated by recent (passively secure) lattice-based OLE implementations in which allowing such leakage enables better efficiency.
We showcase the performance of our protocol by applying its implementation to several useful instances of secure arithmetic computation.
On ``wide\u27\u27 circuits, such as ones computing a fixed function on many different inputs, our protocol is 5x faster and transmits 4x less data than the state-of-the-art Overdrive (Keller et al., Eurocrypt 2018).
Our benchmarks include a general passive-to-active OLE compiler, authenticated generation of ``Beaver triples\u27\u27, and a system for securely outsourcing neural network classification. The latter is the first actively secure implementation of its kind, strengthening the passive security provided by recent related works (Mohassel and Zhang, IEEE S&P 2017; Juvekar et al., USENIX 2018)
Recommended from our members
Cryptography
The Oberwolfach workshop Cryptography brought together scientists from cryptography with mathematicians specializing in the algorithmic problems underlying cryptographic security. The goal of the workshop was to stimulate interaction and collaboration that enables a holistic approach to designing cryptography from the mathematical foundations to practical applications. The workshop covered basic computational problems such as factoring and computing discrete logarithms and short vectors. It addressed fundamental research results leading to innovative cryptography for protecting security and privacy in cloud applications. It also covered some practical applications
Chameleon: A Hybrid Secure Computation Framework for Machine Learning Applications
We present Chameleon, a novel hybrid (mixed-protocol) framework for secure
function evaluation (SFE) which enables two parties to jointly compute a
function without disclosing their private inputs. Chameleon combines the best
aspects of generic SFE protocols with the ones that are based upon additive
secret sharing. In particular, the framework performs linear operations in the
ring using additively secret shared values and nonlinear
operations using Yao's Garbled Circuits or the Goldreich-Micali-Wigderson
protocol. Chameleon departs from the common assumption of additive or linear
secret sharing models where three or more parties need to communicate in the
online phase: the framework allows two parties with private inputs to
communicate in the online phase under the assumption of a third node generating
correlated randomness in an offline phase. Almost all of the heavy
cryptographic operations are precomputed in an offline phase which
substantially reduces the communication overhead. Chameleon is both scalable
and significantly more efficient than the ABY framework (NDSS'15) it is based
on. Our framework supports signed fixed-point numbers. In particular,
Chameleon's vector dot product of signed fixed-point numbers improves the
efficiency of mining and classification of encrypted data for algorithms based
upon heavy matrix multiplications. Our evaluation of Chameleon on a 5 layer
convolutional deep neural network shows 133x and 4.2x faster executions than
Microsoft CryptoNets (ICML'16) and MiniONN (CCS'17), respectively
Server-Aided Privacy-Preserving Proximity Testing
Proximity testing is at the core of many Location-Based online Services (LBS) which we use in our daily lives to order taxis, find places of interest nearby, connect with people. Currently, most such services expect a user to submit his location to them and trust the LBS not to abuse this information, and use it only to provide the service. Existing cases of such information being misused (e.g., by the LBS employees or criminals who breached its security) motivates the search for better solutions that would ensure the privacy of user data, and give users control of how their data is being used.In this thesis, we address this problem using cryptographic techniques. We propose three cryptographic protocols that allow two users to perform proximity testing (check if they are close enough to each other) with the help of two servers.In the papers 1 and 2, the servers are introduced in order to allow users not to be online at the same time: one user may submit their location to the servers and go offline, the other user coming online later and finishing proximity testing. The drastically improves the practicality of such protocols, since the mobile devices that users usually run may not always be online. We stress that the servers in these protocols merely aid the users in performing the proximity testing, and none of the servers can independently extract the user data.In the paper 3, we use the servers to offload the users\u27 computation and communication to. The servers here pre-generate correlated random data and send it to users, who can use it to perform a secure proximity testing protocol faster. Paper 3, together with the paper 2, are highly practical: they provide strong security guarantees and are suitable to be executed on resource-constrained mobile devices. In fact, the work of clients in these protocols is close to negligible as most of the work is done by servers
- …