425 research outputs found

    Detection of osteoporosis in lumbar spine [L1-L4] trabecular bone: a review article

    Get PDF
    The human bones are categorized based on elemental micro architecture and porosity. The porosity of the inner trabecular bone is high that is 40-95% and the nature of the bone is soft and spongy where as the cortical bone is harder and is less porous that is 5 to 15%. Osteoporosis is a disease that normally affects women usually after their menopause. It largely causes mild bone fractures and further stages lead to the demise of an individual. This analysis is on the basis of bone mineral density (BMD) standards obtained through a variety of scientific methods experimented from different skeletal regions. The detection of osteoporosis in lumbar spine has been widely recognized as a promising way to frequent fractures. Therefore, premature analysis of osteoporosis will estimate the risk of the bone fracture which prevents life threats. This paper focuses on the advanced technology in imaging systems and fracture probability analysis of osteoporosis detection. The various segmentation techniques are explored to examine osteoporosis in particular region of the image and further significant attributes are extracted using different methods to classify normal and abnormal (osteoporotic) bones. The limitations of the reviewed papers are more in feature dimensions, lesser accuracy and expensive imaging modalities like computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and DEXA. To overcome these limitations it is suggested to have less feature dimensions, more accuracy and cost-effective imaging modality like X-ray. This is required to avoid bone fractures and to improve BMD with precision which further helps in the diagnosis of osteoporosis

    Application of artificial intelligence in the dental field : A literature review

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively review the literature regarding the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the dental field, focusing on the evaluation criteria and architecture types. Study selection: Electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus) were searched. Full-text articles describing the clinical application of AI for the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lesions and the AI method/architecture were included. Results: The primary search presented 422 studies from 1996 to 2019, and 58 studies were finally selected. Regarding the year of publication, the oldest study, which was reported in 1996, focused on โ€œoral and maxillofacial surgery.โ€ Machine-learning architectures were employed in the selected studies, while approximately half of them (29/58) employed neural networks. Regarding the evaluation criteria, eight studies compared the results obtained by AI with the diagnoses formulated by dentists, while several studies compared two or more architectures in terms of performance. The following parameters were employed for evaluating the AI performance: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, mean absolute error, root mean squared error, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Conclusion: Application of AI in the dental field has progressed; however, the criteria for evaluating the efficacy of AI have not been clarified. It is necessary to obtain better quality data for machine learning to achieve the effective diagnosis of lesions and suitable treatment planning

    Diagnosis of osteoporosis from dental panoramic radiographs using the support vector machine method in a computer-aided system

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Early diagnosis of osteoporosis can potentially decrease the risk of fractures and improve the quality of life. Detection of thin inferior cortices of the mandible on dental panoramic radiographs could be useful for identifying postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of using kernel-based support vector machine (SVM) learning regarding the cortical width of the mandible on dental panoramic radiographs to identify postmenopausal women with low BMD.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We employed our newly adopted SVM method for continuous measurement of the cortical width of the mandible on dental panoramic radiographs to identify women with low BMD or osteoporosis. The original X-ray image was enhanced, cortical boundaries were determined, distances among the upper and lower boundaries were evaluated and discrimination was performed by a radial basis function. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of this newly developed method for identifying women with low BMD (BMD T-score of -1.0 or less) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck in 100 postmenopausal women (โ‰ฅ50 years old) with no previous diagnosis of osteoporosis. Sixty women were used for system training, and 40 were used in testing.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The sensitivity and specificity using RBF kernel-SVM method for identifying women with low BMD were 90.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.3-96.5] and 83.8% (95% CI, 76.6-91.0), respectively at the lumbar spine and 90.0% (95% CI, 84.1-95.9) and 69.1% (95% CI, 60.1-78.6), respectively at the femoral neck. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying women with low BMD at either the lumbar spine or femoral neck were 90.6% (95% CI, 92.0-100) and 80.9% (95% CI, 71.0-86.9), respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that the newly developed system with the SVM method would be useful for identifying postmenopausal women with low skeletal BMD.</p

    Stochastic Assessment of Bone Fragility in Human Lumbar Spine

    Get PDF
    Osteoporotic fractures are a vital public health concern and create a great economic burden for our society. It is estimated that more than 2 million fractures occur in the United States at a cost of $17 billion each year. Deterioration of microarchitecture of trabecular bone is considered as a major contributor to bone fragility. Current clinical imaging modalities such as Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are not able to describe bone microarchitecture due to their low resolution. The main objective of this study was to obtain the relationship between stochastic parameters calculated from bone mineral density (BMD) maps of DXA scans and the microarchitecture parameters measured from three dimensional (3D) images of human lumbar vertebrae acquired using a Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) scanner. Eighteen human lumbar vertebrae with intact posterior elements were scanned in the posterior-anterior projection using a DXA scanner. Stochastic parameters such as correlation length (L), sill variance (C) and nugget variance ( ) were calculated by fitting a theoretical model onto the experimental variogram of the BMD map of the human vertebrae. In addition, microarchitecture parameters such as bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular number (Tb.N), connectivity density (Conn.Dn), and bone surface-to-volume ratio (BS/BV) were measured from 3D images of the same human lumbar vertebrae. Significant correlations were observed between stochastic predictors and microarchitecture parameters of trabecular bone. Specifically, the sill variance was positively correlated with the bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, connectivity density and negatively correlated with the bone surface to volume ratio and trabecular separation. This study demonstrates that stochastic assessment of the inhomogeneity of bone mineral density from routine clinical DXA scans of human lumbar vertebrae may have the potential to serve as a valuable clinical tool in enhancing the prediction of risks for osteoporotic fractures in the spine. The main advantage of using DXA scans is that it would be cost effective, since most hospitals already have DXA machines and there would be no need for purchasing new equipment

    Bone health assessment via digital wrist tomosynthesis in the mammography setting

    Get PDF
    Bone fractures attributable to osteoporosis are a significant problem. Though preventative treatment options are available for individuals who are at risk of a fracture, a substantial number of these individuals are not identified due to lack of adherence to bone screening recommendations. The issue is further complicated as standard diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which, while helpful in identifying many at risk, is limited in fully predicting risk of fracture. It is reasonable to expect that bone screening would become more prevalent and efficacious if offered in coordination with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams, provided that osteoporosis can be assessed using a DBT modality. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to explore the feasibility of using digital tomosynthesis imaging in a mammography setting. To this end, we measured density, cortical thickness and microstructural properties of the wrist bone, correlated these to reference measurements from microcomputed tomography and DXA, demonstrated the application in vivo in a small group of participants, and determined the repeatability of the measurements. We found that measurements from digital wrist tomosynthesis (DWT) imaging with a DBT scanner were highly repeatable ex vivo (error = 0.05%-9.62%) and in vivo (error = 0.06%-10.2%). In ex vivo trials, DWT derived BMDs were strongly correlated with reference measurements (R = 0.841-0.980), as were cortical thickness measured at lateral and medial cortices (R = 0.991 and R = 0.959, respectively) and the majority of microstructural measures (R = 0.736-0.991). The measurements were quick and tolerated by human patients with no discomfort, and appeared to be different between young and old participants in a preliminary comparison. In conclusion, DWT is feasible in a mammography setting, and informative on bone mass, cortical thickness, and microstructural qualities that are known to deteriorate in osteoporosis. To our knowledge, this study represents the first application of DBT for imaging bone. Future clinical studies are needed to further establish the efficacy for diagnosing osteoporosis and predicting risk of fragility fracture using DWT

    ์น˜๊ณผ์šฉ ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์„ ๋ณ„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ฌ์ธต ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง(deep CNN)์˜ ์ „์ดํ•™์Šต ์ „๋žต

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ์ตœ์ง„์šฑ.Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mass and disruption in bone micro-architecture. Clinical diagnostic methods for osteoporosis are expensive and therefore have limited availability in population. Recent studies have shown that Dental Panoramic Radiographs (DPRs) can provide the bone density change clues in bone structure analysis. This study aims to evaluate the discriminating performance of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), employed with various transfer learning strategies, on the classification of specific features of osteoporosis in DPRs. For objective labeling, we collected a dataset containing 680 images from different patients who underwent both skeletal bone mineral density and digital panoramic radiographic examinations at the Korea University Ansan Hospital between 2009 and 2018. In order to select the backbone convolutional neural network which is the basis for applying the transfer learning, we conducted preliminary experiments on the three convolutional neural networks, VGG-16, Resnet50, and Xception networks, which were frequently used in image classification. Since VGG-16 showed the best AUC value in the classification experiment conducted without transfer learning, the transfer learning using the fine-tunning technique was tested using VGG-16 as the backbone network. In order to find the optimal fine-tuning degree in the VGG-16 network, a total of six fine-tuning applied transfer learning groups were set according to the number of fine-tuning blocks in the VGG-16 with five blocks as follows: A group that does not perform fine-tuning at all (VGG-16-TF0), a group that fine-tunes the last 1 block (VGG-16-TF1), a group that fine-tuning the last 2 blocks (VGG-16-TF2), a group that fine-tuning the last 3 blocks (VGG-16-TF3), a group that fine-tuning the last 4 blocks (VGG-16-TF4), and a group that performs fine-tuning all 5 blocks (VGG-16-SCR).The best performing model (VGG-16-TF2) achieved an overall area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.858. In this study, transfer learning and optimal fine-tuning improved the performance of a deep CNN for screening osteoporosis in DPR images. In addition, using the gradient-weighted class activation mapping technique, a visual interpretation of the best performing deep CNN model indicated that the model relied on image features in the lower left and right border of the mandibular. This result suggests that deep learning-based assessment of DPR images could be useful and reliable in the automated screening of osteoporosis patients.๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์€ ๊ณจ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ๊ณ  ๊ณจ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๋ถ•๊ดด๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ง• ์ธ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์„ฑ ๊ณจ ์งˆํ™˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž„์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ค‘์— ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ DXA ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ˜•์˜ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์šฉ ์—‘์Šค๋ ˆ์ด ์žฅ๋น„๊ฐ€ ๋ณ„๋„๋กœ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋†’์•„, ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์˜ ์ด์šฉ์„ฑ์— ์ œํ•œ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์น˜๊ณผ ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์‚ฌ์ง„ (DPR) ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณจ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธก ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” DPR์—์„œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ณจ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์—‘์Šค๋ ˆ์ด ์˜์ƒ ํŠน์ด์„ฑ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ „์ด ํ•™์Šต์ „๋žต์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์‹ฌ์ธต ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (CNN)์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ๋‘์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ฉ์Šต ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์šฉ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ธ ๋ผ๋ฒจ๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 2009๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2018๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณ ๋ ค ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ์•ˆ์‚ฐ ๋ณ‘์›์—์„œ ๊ณจ๋ฐ€๋„ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์™€ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์ดฌ์˜์„ 6๊ฐœ์›” ์ด๋‚ด์— ๋™์‹œ์— ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž๋“ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 680๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์„ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์ด ํ•™์Šต ์ „ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด ๋˜๋Š” ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜์— ์ž์ฃผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 3๊ฐœ์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ์ธ VGG-16, Resnet-50 ๋ฐ Xception ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ „์ดํ•™์Šต์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. VGG-16์€ ์ „์ด ํ•™์Šต ์—†์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋œ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ 2๊ฐœ์˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋†’์€ AUC ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ฃผ์—ˆ๊ธฐ์—, ํ•ด๋‹น ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฑ๋ณธ(back-bone) ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „์ดํ•™์Šต ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐฑ๋ณธ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ fine-tuning ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด VGG-16์— fine-tuning์ด ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ธ”๋ก ์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ด 6 ๊ฐœ์˜ fine-tuning ์ ์šฉ ์ „์ด ํ•™์Šต ๊ทธ๋ฃน์ด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์„ค์ • ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. fine-tuning์„ ์ „ํ˜€ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน (VGG16-TR0), ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ 1 ๋ธ”๋ก์„ fine-tuning ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน (VGG-16-TF1), ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ 2 ๋ธ”๋ก์„ fine-tuning ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน (VGG-16-TF2), ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ 3 ๊ฐœ ๋ธ”๋ก์„ fine-tuningํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน (VGG-16-TF3), ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ 4 ๊ฐœ ๋ธ”๋ก์„ fine-tuningํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน (VGG-16-TF4) ๋ฐ 5 ๊ฐœ ๋ธ”๋ก ๋ชจ๋‘๋ฅผ fine-tuningํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน (VGG16-TR5). ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์€ VGG-16-TF2 ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฐ’์˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ AUC ๊ฐ’์ด 0.858๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•™์Šต์šฉ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์— ์ œํ•œ์ด ์žˆ๋”๋ผ๋„, ์ „์ด ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ fine-tuning์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ DPR ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฌ๋‹ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ gradiant-CAM ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ CNN ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ์  ํ•ด์„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ, DPR ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์ƒ์—์„œ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ํ•˜์•…๊ณจ์˜ ์™ผ์ชฝ ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ํ•˜์—ฐ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์—์žˆ๋Š” ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์— ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” DPR ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์˜ ๋”ฅ ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ž๋™ ์„ ๋ณ„์— ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌ ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Materials and Methods 8 2.1 Dataset Collection 8 2.2 Image Preprocessing 9 2.3 Cross validation 11 2.4 Back-bone Convolutional Neural Networks 14 2.5 Evaluation 16 2.6 Visualizing Model Decisions 18 Chapter 3. Results 19 3.1 Clinical and Demographic Characteristics 19 3.2 Back-bone Convolutional Neural Networks 20 3.3 Fine-Tuning of Transferred deep CNN 22 3.4 Evaluation 27 3.5 Visualizing Model Decisions 30 Chapter 4. Discussion 33 Chapter 5. Conclusion 42 References 42 Abstract 51Docto

    Identification of osteoporosis using ensemble deep learning model with panoramic radiographs and clinical covariates

    Get PDF
    Osteoporosis is becoming a global health issue due to increased life expectancy. However, it is difficult to detect in its early stages owing to a lack of discernible symptoms. Hence, screening for osteoporosis with widely used dental panoramic radiographs would be very cost-effective and useful. In this study, we investigate the use of deep learning to classify osteoporosis from dental panoramic radiographs. In addition, the effect of adding clinical covariate data to the radiographic images on the identification performance was assessed. For objective labeling, a dataset containing 778 images was collected from patients who underwent both skeletal-bone-mineral density measurement and dental panoramic radiography at a single general hospital between 2014 and 2020. Osteoporosis was assessed from the dental panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural network (CNN) models, including EfficientNet-b0, -b3, and -b7 and ResNet-18, -50, and -152. An ensemble model was also constructed with clinical covariates added to each CNN. The ensemble model exhibited improved performance on all metrics for all CNNs, especially accuracy and AUC. The results show that deep learning using CNN can accurately classify osteoporosis from dental panoramic radiographs. Furthermore, it was shown that the accuracy can be improved using an ensemble model with patient covariates
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore