1,853 research outputs found

    Minimal Suffix and Rotation of a Substring in Optimal Time

    Get PDF
    For a text given in advance, the substring minimal suffix queries ask to determine the lexicographically minimal non-empty suffix of a substring specified by the location of its occurrence in the text. We develop a data structure answering such queries optimally: in constant time after linear-time preprocessing. This improves upon the results of Babenko et al. (CPM 2014), whose trade-off solution is characterized by Θ(nlogn)\Theta(n\log n) product of these time complexities. Next, we extend our queries to support concatenations of O(1)O(1) substrings, for which the construction and query time is preserved. We apply these generalized queries to compute lexicographically minimal and maximal rotations of a given substring in constant time after linear-time preprocessing. Our data structures mainly rely on properties of Lyndon words and Lyndon factorizations. We combine them with further algorithmic and combinatorial tools, such as fusion trees and the notion of order isomorphism of strings

    Document Retrieval on Repetitive Collections

    Full text link
    Document retrieval aims at finding the most important documents where a pattern appears in a collection of strings. Traditional pattern-matching techniques yield brute-force document retrieval solutions, which has motivated the research on tailored indexes that offer near-optimal performance. However, an experimental study establishing which alternatives are actually better than brute force, and which perform best depending on the collection characteristics, has not been carried out. In this paper we address this shortcoming by exploring the relationship between the nature of the underlying collection and the performance of current methods. Via extensive experiments we show that established solutions are often beaten in practice by brute-force alternatives. We also design new methods that offer superior time/space trade-offs, particularly on repetitive collections.Comment: Accepted to ESA 2014. Implementation and experiments at http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/group/suds/rlcsa

    Wavelet Trees Meet Suffix Trees

    Full text link
    We present an improved wavelet tree construction algorithm and discuss its applications to a number of rank/select problems for integer keys and strings. Given a string of length n over an alphabet of size σn\sigma\leq n, our method builds the wavelet tree in O(nlogσ/logn)O(n \log \sigma/ \sqrt{\log{n}}) time, improving upon the state-of-the-art algorithm by a factor of logn\sqrt{\log n}. As a consequence, given an array of n integers we can construct in O(nlogn)O(n \sqrt{\log n}) time a data structure consisting of O(n)O(n) machine words and capable of answering rank/select queries for the subranges of the array in O(logn/loglogn)O(\log n / \log \log n) time. This is a loglogn\log \log n-factor improvement in query time compared to Chan and P\u{a}tra\c{s}cu and a logn\sqrt{\log n}-factor improvement in construction time compared to Brodal et al. Next, we switch to stringological context and propose a novel notion of wavelet suffix trees. For a string w of length n, this data structure occupies O(n)O(n) words, takes O(nlogn)O(n \sqrt{\log n}) time to construct, and simultaneously captures the combinatorial structure of substrings of w while enabling efficient top-down traversal and binary search. In particular, with a wavelet suffix tree we are able to answer in O(logx)O(\log |x|) time the following two natural analogues of rank/select queries for suffixes of substrings: for substrings x and y of w count the number of suffixes of x that are lexicographically smaller than y, and for a substring x of w and an integer k, find the k-th lexicographically smallest suffix of x. We further show that wavelet suffix trees allow to compute a run-length-encoded Burrows-Wheeler transform of a substring x of w in O(slogx)O(s \log |x|) time, where s denotes the length of the resulting run-length encoding. This answers a question by Cormode and Muthukrishnan, who considered an analogous problem for Lempel-Ziv compression.Comment: 33 pages, 5 figures; preliminary version published at SODA 201

    Linear-Space Data Structures for Range Mode Query in Arrays

    Full text link
    A mode of a multiset SS is an element aSa \in S of maximum multiplicity; that is, aa occurs at least as frequently as any other element in SS. Given a list A[1:n]A[1:n] of nn items, we consider the problem of constructing a data structure that efficiently answers range mode queries on AA. Each query consists of an input pair of indices (i,j)(i, j) for which a mode of A[i:j]A[i:j] must be returned. We present an O(n22ϵ)O(n^{2-2\epsilon})-space static data structure that supports range mode queries in O(nϵ)O(n^\epsilon) time in the worst case, for any fixed ϵ[0,1/2]\epsilon \in [0,1/2]. When ϵ=1/2\epsilon = 1/2, this corresponds to the first linear-space data structure to guarantee O(n)O(\sqrt{n}) query time. We then describe three additional linear-space data structures that provide O(k)O(k), O(m)O(m), and O(ji)O(|j-i|) query time, respectively, where kk denotes the number of distinct elements in AA and mm denotes the frequency of the mode of AA. Finally, we examine generalizing our data structures to higher dimensions.Comment: 13 pages, 2 figure

    Duel and sweep algorithm for order-preserving pattern matching

    Full text link
    Given a text TT and a pattern PP over alphabet Σ\Sigma, the classic exact matching problem searches for all occurrences of pattern PP in text TT. Unlike exact matching problem, order-preserving pattern matching (OPPM) considers the relative order of elements, rather than their real values. In this paper, we propose an efficient algorithm for OPPM problem using the "duel-and-sweep" paradigm. Our algorithm runs in O(n+mlogm)O(n + m\log m) time in general and O(n+m)O(n + m) time under an assumption that the characters in a string can be sorted in linear time with respect to the string size. We also perform experiments and show that our algorithm is faster that KMP-based algorithm. Last, we introduce the two-dimensional order preserved pattern matching and give a duel and sweep algorithm that runs in O(n2)O(n^2) time for duel stage and O(n2m)O(n^2 m) time for sweeping time with O(m3)O(m^3) preprocessing time.Comment: 13 pages, 5 figure
    corecore