27,783 research outputs found
Empirical Methodology for Crowdsourcing Ground Truth
The process of gathering ground truth data through human annotation is a
major bottleneck in the use of information extraction methods for populating
the Semantic Web. Crowdsourcing-based approaches are gaining popularity in the
attempt to solve the issues related to volume of data and lack of annotators.
Typically these practices use inter-annotator agreement as a measure of
quality. However, in many domains, such as event detection, there is ambiguity
in the data, as well as a multitude of perspectives of the information
examples. We present an empirically derived methodology for efficiently
gathering of ground truth data in a diverse set of use cases covering a variety
of domains and annotation tasks. Central to our approach is the use of
CrowdTruth metrics that capture inter-annotator disagreement. We show that
measuring disagreement is essential for acquiring a high quality ground truth.
We achieve this by comparing the quality of the data aggregated with CrowdTruth
metrics with majority vote, over a set of diverse crowdsourcing tasks: Medical
Relation Extraction, Twitter Event Identification, News Event Extraction and
Sound Interpretation. We also show that an increased number of crowd workers
leads to growth and stabilization in the quality of annotations, going against
the usual practice of employing a small number of annotators.Comment: in publication at the Semantic Web Journa
A Hierarchical Framework for Relation Extraction with Reinforcement Learning
Most existing methods determine relation types only after all the entities
have been recognized, thus the interaction between relation types and entity
mentions is not fully modeled. This paper presents a novel paradigm to deal
with relation extraction by regarding the related entities as the arguments of
a relation. We apply a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) framework in
this paradigm to enhance the interaction between entity mentions and relation
types. The whole extraction process is decomposed into a hierarchy of two-level
RL policies for relation detection and entity extraction respectively, so that
it is more feasible and natural to deal with overlapping relations. Our model
was evaluated on public datasets collected via distant supervision, and results
show that it gains better performance than existing methods and is more
powerful for extracting overlapping relations.Comment: To appear in AAAI 1
IEST: WASSA-2018 Implicit Emotions Shared Task
Past shared tasks on emotions use data with both overt expressions of
emotions (I am so happy to see you!) as well as subtle expressions where the
emotions have to be inferred, for instance from event descriptions. Further,
most datasets do not focus on the cause or the stimulus of the emotion. Here,
for the first time, we propose a shared task where systems have to predict the
emotions in a large automatically labeled dataset of tweets without access to
words denoting emotions. Based on this intention, we call this the Implicit
Emotion Shared Task (IEST) because the systems have to infer the emotion mostly
from the context. Every tweet has an occurrence of an explicit emotion word
that is masked. The tweets are collected in a manner such that they are likely
to include a description of the cause of the emotion - the stimulus.
Altogether, 30 teams submitted results which range from macro F1 scores of 21 %
to 71 %. The baseline (MaxEnt bag of words and bigrams) obtains an F1 score of
60 % which was available to the participants during the development phase. A
study with human annotators suggests that automatic methods outperform human
predictions, possibly by honing into subtle textual clues not used by humans.
Corpora, resources, and results are available at the shared task website at
http://implicitemotions.wassa2018.com.Comment: Accepted at Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Computational
Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysi
- …