4,402 research outputs found
Towards Practical Graph-Based Verification for an Object-Oriented Concurrency Model
To harness the power of multi-core and distributed platforms, and to make the
development of concurrent software more accessible to software engineers,
different object-oriented concurrency models such as SCOOP have been proposed.
Despite the practical importance of analysing SCOOP programs, there are
currently no general verification approaches that operate directly on program
code without additional annotations. One reason for this is the multitude of
partially conflicting semantic formalisations for SCOOP (either in theory or
by-implementation). Here, we propose a simple graph transformation system (GTS)
based run-time semantics for SCOOP that grasps the most common features of all
known semantics of the language. This run-time model is implemented in the
state-of-the-art GTS tool GROOVE, which allows us to simulate, analyse, and
verify a subset of SCOOP programs with respect to deadlocks and other
behavioural properties. Besides proposing the first approach to verify SCOOP
programs by automatic translation to GTS, we also highlight our experiences of
applying GTS (and especially GROOVE) for specifying semantics in the form of a
run-time model, which should be transferable to GTS models for other concurrent
languages and libraries.Comment: In Proceedings GaM 2015, arXiv:1504.0244
A Graph-Based Semantics Workbench for Concurrent Asynchronous Programs
A number of novel programming languages and libraries have been proposed that
offer simpler-to-use models of concurrency than threads. It is challenging,
however, to devise execution models that successfully realise their
abstractions without forfeiting performance or introducing unintended
behaviours. This is exemplified by SCOOP---a concurrent object-oriented
message-passing language---which has seen multiple semantics proposed and
implemented over its evolution. We propose a "semantics workbench" with fully
and semi-automatic tools for SCOOP, that can be used to analyse and compare
programs with respect to different execution models. We demonstrate its use in
checking the consistency of semantics by applying it to a set of representative
programs, and highlighting a deadlock-related discrepancy between the principal
execution models of the language. Our workbench is based on a modular and
parameterisable graph transformation semantics implemented in the GROOVE tool.
We discuss how graph transformations are leveraged to atomically model
intricate language abstractions, and how the visual yet algebraic nature of the
model can be used to ascertain soundness.Comment: Accepted for publication in the proceedings of FASE 2016 (to appear
Expression-based aliasing for OO-languages
Alias analysis has been an interesting research topic in verification and
optimization of programs. The undecidability of determining whether two
expressions in a program may reference to the same object is the main source of
the challenges raised in alias analysis. In this paper we propose an extension
of a previously introduced alias calculus based on program expressions, to the
setting of unbounded program executions s.a. infinite loops and recursive
calls. Moreover, we devise a corresponding executable specification in the
K-framework. An important property of our extension is that, in a
non-concurrent setting, the corresponding alias expressions can be
over-approximated in terms of a notion of regular expressions. This further
enables us to show that the associated K-machinery implements an algorithm that
always stops and provides a sound over-approximation of the "may aliasing"
information, where soundness stands for the lack of false negatives. As a case
study, we analyze the integration and further applications of the alias
calculus in SCOOP. The latter is an object-oriented programming model for
concurrency, recently formalized in Maude; K-definitions can be compiled into
Maude for execution
Efficient and Reasonable Object-Oriented Concurrency
Making threaded programs safe and easy to reason about is one of the chief
difficulties in modern programming. This work provides an efficient execution
model for SCOOP, a concurrency approach that provides not only data race
freedom but also pre/postcondition reasoning guarantees between threads. The
extensions we propose influence both the underlying semantics to increase the
amount of concurrent execution that is possible, exclude certain classes of
deadlocks, and enable greater performance. These extensions are used as the
basis an efficient runtime and optimization pass that improve performance 15x
over a baseline implementation. This new implementation of SCOOP is also 2x
faster than other well-known safe concurrent languages. The measurements are
based on both coordination-intensive and data-manipulation-intensive benchmarks
designed to offer a mixture of workloads.Comment: Proceedings of the 10th Joint Meeting of the European Software
Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of
Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE '15). ACM, 201
A semantics comparison workbench for a concurrent, asynchronous, distributed programming language
A number of high-level languages and libraries have been proposed that offer
novel and simple to use abstractions for concurrent, asynchronous, and
distributed programming. The execution models that realise them, however, often
change over time---whether to improve performance, or to extend them to new
language features---potentially affecting behavioural and safety properties of
existing programs. This is exemplified by SCOOP, a message-passing approach to
concurrent object-oriented programming that has seen multiple changes proposed
and implemented, with demonstrable consequences for an idiomatic usage of its
core abstraction. We propose a semantics comparison workbench for SCOOP with
fully and semi-automatic tools for analysing and comparing the state spaces of
programs with respect to different execution models or semantics. We
demonstrate its use in checking the consistency of properties across semantics
by applying it to a set of representative programs, and highlighting a
deadlock-related discrepancy between the principal execution models of SCOOP.
Furthermore, we demonstrate the extensibility of the workbench by generalising
the formalisation of an execution model to support recently proposed extensions
for distributed programming. Our workbench is based on a modular and
parameterisable graph transformation semantics implemented in the GROOVE tool.
We discuss how graph transformations are leveraged to atomically model
intricate language abstractions, how the visual yet algebraic nature of the
model can be used to ascertain soundness, and highlight how the approach could
be applied to similar languages.Comment: Accepted by Formal Aspects of Computin
Space Programs Summary No. 37-51, Volume 1 for the Period March 1 to April 30, 1968. Flight Projects
Mariner Mars 1969 project, Surveyor soft landing, and advanced planetary missions technolog
Modelling and Verifying an Object-Oriented Concurrency Model in GROOVE
SCOOP is a programming model and language that allows concurrent programming
at a high level of abstraction. Several approaches to verifying SCOOP programs
have been proposed in the past, but none of them operate directly on the source
code without modifications or annotations.
We propose a fully automatic approach to verifying (a subset of) SCOOP
programs by translation to graph-based models. First, we present a graph
transformation based semantics for SCOOP. We present an implementation of the
model in the state-of-the-art model checker GROOVE, which can be used to
simulate programs and verify concurrency and consistency properties, such as
the impossibility of deadlocks occurring or the absence of postcondition
violations. Second, we present a translation tool that operates on SCOOP
program code and generates input for the model. We evaluate our approach by
inspecting a number of programs in the form of case studies.Comment: 124 pages, Master's Thesis at ETH Z\"uric
- …