Vector processing-aware advanced clock-gating techniques for low-power fused multiply-add

The need for power efficiency is driving a rethink of design decisions in processor architectures. While vector processors succeeded in the high-performance market in the past, they need a retailoring for the mobile market that they are entering now. Floating-point (FP) fused multiply-add (FMA), being a functional unit with high power consumption, deserves special attention. Although clock gating is a well-known method to reduce switching power in synchronous designs, there are unexplored opportunities for its application to vector processors, especially when considering active operating mode. In this research, we comprehensively identify, propose, and evaluate the most suitable clock-gating techniques for vector FMA units (VFUs). These techniques ensure power savings without jeopardizing the timing. We evaluate the proposed techniques using both synthetic and “real-world” application-based benchmarking. Using vector masking and vector multilane-aware clock gating, we report power reductions of up to 52%, assuming active VFU operating at the peak performance. Among other findings, we observe that vector instruction-based clock-gating techniques achieve power savings for all vector FP instructions. Finally, when evaluating all techniques together, using “real-world” benchmarking, the power reductions are up to 80%. Additionally, in accordance with processor design trends, we perform this research in a fully parameterizable and automated fashion.The research leading to these results has received funding from the RoMoL ERC Advanced Grant GA 321253 and is supported in part by the European Union (FEDER funds) under contract TTIN2015-65316-P. The work of I. Ratkovic was supported by a FPU research grant from the Spanish MECD.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Chapter One – An Overview of Architecture-Level Power- and Energy-Efficient Design Techniques

Power dissipation and energy consumption became the primary design constraint for almost all computer systems in the last 15 years. Both computer architects and circuit designers intent to reduce power and energy (without a performance degradation) at all design levels, as it is currently the main obstacle to continue with further scaling according to Moore's law. The aim of this survey is to provide a comprehensive overview of power- and energy-efficient “state-of-the-art” techniques. We classify techniques by component where they apply to, which is the most natural way from a designer point of view. We further divide the techniques by the component of power/energy they optimize (static or dynamic), covering in that way complete low-power design flow at the architectural level. At the end, we conclude that only a holistic approach that assumes optimizations at all design levels can lead to significant savings.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

On the selection of adder unit in energy efficient vector processing

Vector processors are a very promising solution for mobile devices and servers due to their inherently energy-efficient way of exploiting data-level parallelism. Previous research on vector architectures predominantly focused on performance, so vector processors require a new design space exploration to achieve low power. In this paper, we present a design space exploration of adder unit for vector processors (VA), as it is one of the crucial components in the core design with a non-negligible impact in overall performance and power. For this interrelated circuit-architecture exploration, we developed a novel framework with both architectural- and circuit-level tools. Our framework includes both design- (e.g. adder's family type) and vector architecture-related parameters (e.g. vector length). Finally, we present guidelines on the selection of the most appropriate VA for different types of vector processors according to different sets of metrics of interest. For example, we found that 2-lane configurations are more EDP (Energy×Delay)-efficient than single lane configurations for low-end mobile processors.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version