536 research outputs found
On optimal language compression for sets in PSPACE/poly
We show that if DTIME[2^O(n)] is not included in DSPACE[2^o(n)], then, for
every set B in PSPACE/poly, all strings x in B of length n can be represented
by a string compressed(x) of length at most log(|B^{=n}|)+O(log n), such that a
polynomial-time algorithm, given compressed(x), can distinguish x from all the
other strings in B^{=n}. Modulo the O(log n) additive term, this achieves the
information-theoretic optimum for string compression. We also observe that
optimal compression is not possible for sets more complex than PSPACE/poly
because for any time-constructible superpolynomial function t, there is a set A
computable in space t(n) such that at least one string x of length n requires
compressed(x) to be of length 2 log(|A^=n|).Comment: submitted to Theory of Computing System
Dimension Extractors and Optimal Decompression
A *dimension extractor* is an algorithm designed to increase the effective
dimension -- i.e., the amount of computational randomness -- of an infinite
binary sequence, in order to turn a "partially random" sequence into a "more
random" sequence. Extractors are exhibited for various effective dimensions,
including constructive, computable, space-bounded, time-bounded, and
finite-state dimension. Using similar techniques, the Kucera-Gacs theorem is
examined from the perspective of decompression, by showing that every infinite
sequence S is Turing reducible to a Martin-Loef random sequence R such that the
asymptotic number of bits of R needed to compute n bits of S, divided by n, is
precisely the constructive dimension of S, which is shown to be the optimal
ratio of query bits to computed bits achievable with Turing reductions. The
extractors and decompressors that are developed lead directly to new
characterizations of some effective dimensions in terms of optimal
decompression by Turing reductions.Comment: This report was combined with a different conference paper "Every
Sequence is Decompressible from a Random One" (cs.IT/0511074, at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11780342_17), and both titles were changed, with
the conference paper incorporated as section 5 of this new combined paper.
The combined paper was accepted to the journal Theory of Computing Systems,
as part of a special issue of invited papers from the second conference on
Computability in Europe, 200
Nonapproximability Results for Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes
We show that for several variations of partially observable Markov decision
processes, polynomial-time algorithms for finding control policies are unlikely
to or simply don't have guarantees of finding policies within a constant factor
or a constant summand of optimal. Here "unlikely" means "unless some complexity
classes collapse," where the collapses considered are P=NP, P=PSPACE, or P=EXP.
Until or unless these collapses are shown to hold, any control-policy designer
must choose between such performance guarantees and efficient computation
Finite Automata for the Sub- and Superword Closure of CFLs: Descriptional and Computational Complexity
We answer two open questions by (Gruber, Holzer, Kutrib, 2009) on the
state-complexity of representing sub- or superword closures of context-free
grammars (CFGs): (1) We prove a (tight) upper bound of on
the size of nondeterministic finite automata (NFAs) representing the subword
closure of a CFG of size . (2) We present a family of CFGs for which the
minimal deterministic finite automata representing their subword closure
matches the upper-bound of following from (1).
Furthermore, we prove that the inequivalence problem for NFAs representing sub-
or superword-closed languages is only NP-complete as opposed to PSPACE-complete
for general NFAs. Finally, we extend our results into an approximation method
to attack inequivalence problems for CFGs
Processing Succinct Matrices and Vectors
We study the complexity of algorithmic problems for matrices that are
represented by multi-terminal decision diagrams (MTDD). These are a variant of
ordered decision diagrams, where the terminal nodes are labeled with arbitrary
elements of a semiring (instead of 0 and 1). A simple example shows that the
product of two MTDD-represented matrices cannot be represented by an MTDD of
polynomial size. To overcome this deficiency, we extended MTDDs to MTDD_+ by
allowing componentwise symbolic addition of variables (of the same dimension)
in rules. It is shown that accessing an entry, equality checking, matrix
multiplication, and other basic matrix operations can be solved in polynomial
time for MTDD_+-represented matrices. On the other hand, testing whether the
determinant of a MTDD-represented matrix vanishes PSPACE$-complete, and the
same problem is NP-complete for MTDD_+-represented diagonal matrices. Computing
a specific entry in a product of MTDD-represented matrices is #P-complete.Comment: An extended abstract of this paper will appear in the Proceedings of
CSR 201
Dynamic Complexity Meets Parameterised Algorithms
Dynamic Complexity studies the maintainability of queries with logical formulas in a setting where the underlying structure or database changes over time. Most often, these formulas are from first-order logic, giving rise to the dynamic complexity class DynFO. This paper investigates extensions of DynFO in the spirit of parameterised algorithms. In this setting structures come with a parameter k and the extensions allow additional "space" of size f(k) (in the form of an additional structure of this size) or additional time f(k) (in the form of iterations of formulas) or both. The resulting classes are compared with their non-dynamic counterparts and other classes. The main part of the paper explores the applicability of methods for parameterised algorithms to this setting through case studies for various well-known parameterised problems
- …