544 research outputs found

    On the least number of palindromes contained in an infinite word

    Full text link
    We investigate the least number of palindromic factors in an infinite word. We first consider general alphabets, and give answers to this problem for periodic and non-periodic words, closed or not under reversal of factors. We then investigate the same problem when the alphabet has size two.Comment: Accepted for publication in Theoretical Computer Scienc

    On Theta-palindromic Richness

    Get PDF
    In this paper we study generalization of the reversal mapping realized by an arbitrary involutory antimorphism Θ\Theta. It generalizes the notion of a palindrome into a Θ\Theta-palindrome -- a word invariant under Θ\Theta. For languages closed under Θ\Theta we give the relation between Θ\Theta-palindromic complexity and factor complexity. We generalize the notion of richness to Θ\Theta-richness and we prove analogous characterizations of words that are Θ\Theta-rich, especially in the case of set of factors invariant under Θ\Theta. A criterion for Θ\Theta-richness of Θ\Theta-episturmian words is given together with other examples of Θ\Theta-rich words.Comment: 14 page

    Proof of Brlek-Reutenauer conjecture

    Full text link
    Brlek and Reutenauer conjectured that any infinite word u with language closed under reversal satisfies the equality 2D(u) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}T_u(n) in which D(u) denotes the defect of u and T_u(n) denotes C_u(n+1)-C_u(n) +2 - P_U(n+1) - P_u(n), where C_u and P_u are the factor and palindromic complexity of u, respectively. This conjecture was verified for periodic words by Brlek and Reutenauer themselves. Using their results for periodic words, we have recently proved the conjecture for uniformly recurrent words. In the present article we prove the conjecture in its general version by a new method without exploiting the result for periodic words.Comment: 9 page

    Languages invariant under more symmetries: overlapping factors versus palindromic richness

    Full text link
    Factor complexity C\mathcal{C} and palindromic complexity P\mathcal{P} of infinite words with language closed under reversal are known to be related by the inequality P(n)+P(n+1)≤2+C(n+1)−C(n)\mathcal{P}(n) + \mathcal{P}(n+1) \leq 2 + \mathcal{C}(n+1)-\mathcal{C}(n) for any n∈Nn\in \mathbb{N}\,. Word for which the equality is attained for any nn is usually called rich in palindromes. In this article we study words whose languages are invariant under a finite group GG of symmetries. For such words we prove a stronger version of the above inequality. We introduce notion of GG-palindromic richness and give several examples of GG-rich words, including the Thue-Morse sequence as well.Comment: 22 pages, 1 figur

    On Generating Binary Words Palindromically

    Full text link
    We regard a finite word u=u1u2⋯unu=u_1u_2\cdots u_n up to word isomorphism as an equivalence relation on {1,2,…,n}\{1,2,\ldots, n\} where ii is equivalent to jj if and only if xi=xj.x_i=x_j. Some finite words (in particular all binary words) are generated by "{\it palindromic}" relations of the form k∼j+i−kk\sim j+i-k for some choice of 1≤i≤j≤n1\leq i\leq j\leq n and k∈{i,i+1,…,j}.k\in \{i,i+1,\ldots,j\}. That is to say, some finite words uu are uniquely determined up to word isomorphism by the position and length of some of its palindromic factors. In this paper we study the function μ(u)\mu(u) defined as the least number of palindromic relations required to generate u.u. We show that every aperiodic infinite word must contain a factor uu with μ(u)≥3,\mu(u)\geq 3, and that some infinite words xx have the property that μ(u)≤3\mu(u)\leq 3 for each factor uu of x.x. We obtain a complete classification of such words on a binary alphabet (which includes the well known class of Sturmian words). In contrast for the Thue-Morse word, we show that the function μ\mu is unbounded
    • …
    corecore