Effective lambda-models vs recursively enumerable lambda-theories

A longstanding open problem is whether there exists a non syntactical model of the untyped lambda-calculus whose theory is exactly the least lambda-theory (l-beta). In this paper we investigate the more general question of whether the equational/order theory of a model of the (untyped) lambda-calculus can be recursively enumerable (r.e. for brevity). We introduce a notion of effective model of lambda-calculus calculus, which covers in particular all the models individually introduced in the literature. We prove that the order theory of an effective model is never r.e.; from this it follows that its equational theory cannot be l-beta or l-beta-eta. We then show that no effective model living in the stable or strongly stable semantics has an r.e. equational theory. Concerning Scott's semantics, we investigate the class of graph models and prove that no order theory of a graph model can be r.e., and that there exists an effective graph model whose equational/order theory is minimum among all theories of graph models. Finally, we show that the class of graph models enjoys a kind of downwards Lowenheim-Skolem theorem.Comment: 34

Cohomology in Grothendieck Topologies and Lower Bounds in Boolean Complexity

This paper is motivated by questions such as P vs. NP and other questions in Boolean complexity theory. We describe an approach to attacking such questions with cohomology, and we show that using Grothendieck topologies and other ideas from the Grothendieck school gives new hope for such an attack. We focus on circuit depth complexity, and consider only finite topological spaces or Grothendieck topologies based on finite categories; as such, we do not use algebraic geometry or manifolds. Given two sheaves on a Grothendieck topology, their "cohomological complexity" is the sum of the dimensions of their Ext groups. We seek to model the depth complexity of Boolean functions by the cohomological complexity of sheaves on a Grothendieck topology. We propose that the logical AND of two Boolean functions will have its corresponding cohomological complexity bounded in terms of those of the two functions using ``virtual zero extensions.'' We propose that the logical negation of a function will have its corresponding cohomological complexity equal to that of the original function using duality theory. We explain these approaches and show that they are stable under pullbacks and base change. It is the subject of ongoing work to achieve AND and negation bounds simultaneously in a way that yields an interesting depth lower bound.Comment: 70 pages, abstract corrected and modifie

Total Representations

Almost all representations considered in computable analysis are partial. We provide arguments in favor of total representations (by elements of the Baire space). Total representations make the well known analogy between numberings and representations closer, unify some terminology, simplify some technical details, suggest interesting open questions and new invariants of topological spaces relevant to computable analysis.Comment: 30 page

Kolmogorov Complexity of Categories

Kolmogorov complexity theory is used to tell what the algorithmic informational content of a string is. It is defined as the length of the shortest program that describes the string. We present a programming language that can be used to describe categories, functors, and natural transformations. With this in hand, we define the informational content of these categorical structures as the shortest program that describes such structures. Some basic consequences of our definition are presented including the fact that equivalent categories have equal Kolmogorov complexity. We also prove different theorems about what can and cannot be described by our programming language.Comment: 16 page