1,280 research outputs found
Tarski's influence on computer science
The influence of Alfred Tarski on computer science was indirect but
significant in a number of directions and was in certain respects fundamental.
Here surveyed is the work of Tarski on the decision procedure for algebra and
geometry, the method of elimination of quantifiers, the semantics of formal
languages, modeltheoretic preservation theorems, and algebraic logic; various
connections of each with computer science are taken up
Delta-Complete Decision Procedures for Satisfiability over the Reals
We introduce the notion of "\delta-complete decision procedures" for solving
SMT problems over the real numbers, with the aim of handling a wide range of
nonlinear functions including transcendental functions and solutions of
Lipschitz-continuous ODEs. Given an SMT problem \varphi and a positive rational
number \delta, a \delta-complete decision procedure determines either that
\varphi is unsatisfiable, or that the "\delta-weakening" of \varphi is
satisfiable. Here, the \delta-weakening of \varphi is a variant of \varphi that
allows \delta-bounded numerical perturbations on \varphi. We prove the
existence of \delta-complete decision procedures for bounded SMT over reals
with functions mentioned above. For functions in Type 2 complexity class C,
under mild assumptions, the bounded \delta-SMT problem is in NP^C.
\delta-Complete decision procedures can exploit scalable numerical methods for
handling nonlinearity, and we propose to use this notion as an ideal
requirement for numerically-driven decision procedures. As a concrete example,
we formally analyze the DPLL framework, which integrates Interval
Constraint Propagation (ICP) in DPLL(T), and establish necessary and sufficient
conditions for its \delta-completeness. We discuss practical applications of
\delta-complete decision procedures for correctness-critical applications
including formal verification and theorem proving.Comment: A shorter version appears in IJCAR 201
Combining decision procedures for the reals
We address the general problem of determining the validity of boolean
combinations of equalities and inequalities between real-valued expressions. In
particular, we consider methods of establishing such assertions using only
restricted forms of distributivity. At the same time, we explore ways in which
"local" decision or heuristic procedures for fragments of the theory of the
reals can be amalgamated into global ones. Let Tadd[Q] be the
first-order theory of the real numbers in the language of ordered groups, with
negation, a constant 1, and function symbols for multiplication by
rational constants. Let Tmult[Q] be the analogous theory for the
multiplicative structure, and let T[Q] be the union of the two. We
show that although T[Q] is undecidable, the universal fragment of
T[Q] is decidable. We also show that terms of T[Q]can
fruitfully be put in a normal form. We prove analogous results for theories in
which Q is replaced, more generally, by suitable subfields F
of the reals. Finally, we consider practical methods of establishing
quantifier-free validities that approximate our (impractical) decidability
results.Comment: Will appear in Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
Recognising Multidimensional Euclidean Preferences
Euclidean preferences are a widely studied preference model, in which
decision makers and alternatives are embedded in d-dimensional Euclidean space.
Decision makers prefer those alternatives closer to them. This model, also
known as multidimensional unfolding, has applications in economics,
psychometrics, marketing, and many other fields. We study the problem of
deciding whether a given preference profile is d-Euclidean. For the
one-dimensional case, polynomial-time algorithms are known. We show that, in
contrast, for every other fixed dimension d > 1, the recognition problem is
equivalent to the existential theory of the reals (ETR), and so in particular
NP-hard. We further show that some Euclidean preference profiles require
exponentially many bits in order to specify any Euclidean embedding, and prove
that the domain of d-Euclidean preferences does not admit a finite forbidden
minor characterisation for any d > 1. We also study dichotomous preferencesand
the behaviour of other metrics, and survey a variety of related work.Comment: 17 page
Program Verification in the presence of complex numbers, functions with branch cuts etc
In considering the reliability of numerical programs, it is normal to "limit
our study to the semantics dealing with numerical precision" (Martel, 2005). On
the other hand, there is a great deal of work on the reliability of programs
that essentially ignores the numerics. The thesis of this paper is that there
is a class of problems that fall between these two, which could be described as
"does the low-level arithmetic implement the high-level mathematics". Many of
these problems arise because mathematics, particularly the mathematics of the
complex numbers, is more difficult than expected: for example the complex
function log is not continuous, writing down a program to compute an inverse
function is more complicated than just solving an equation, and many algebraic
simplification rules are not universally valid.
The good news is that these problems are theoretically capable of being
solved, and are practically close to being solved, but not yet solved, in
several real-world examples. However, there is still a long way to go before
implementations match the theoretical possibilities
Efficient Solving of Quantified Inequality Constraints over the Real Numbers
Let a quantified inequality constraint over the reals be a formula in the
first-order predicate language over the structure of the real numbers, where
the allowed predicate symbols are and . Solving such constraints is
an undecidable problem when allowing function symbols such or . In
the paper we give an algorithm that terminates with a solution for all, except
for very special, pathological inputs. We ensure the practical efficiency of
this algorithm by employing constraint programming techniques
- …