15 research outputs found
Revisiting the Training of Logic Models of Protein Signaling Networks with a Formal Approach based on Answer Set Programming
A fundamental question in systems biology is the construction and training to
data of mathematical models. Logic formalisms have become very popular to model
signaling networks because their simplicity allows us to model large systems
encompassing hundreds of proteins. An approach to train (Boolean) logic models
to high-throughput phospho-proteomics data was recently introduced and solved
using optimization heuristics based on stochastic methods. Here we demonstrate
how this problem can be solved using Answer Set Programming (ASP), a
declarative problem solving paradigm, in which a problem is encoded as a
logical program such that its answer sets represent solutions to the problem.
ASP has significant improvements over heuristic methods in terms of efficiency
and scalability, it guarantees global optimality of solutions as well as
provides a complete set of solutions. We illustrate the application of ASP with
in silico cases based on realistic networks and data
Optimizing Phylogenetic Supertrees Using Answer Set Programming
The supertree construction problem is about combining several phylogenetic
trees with possibly conflicting information into a single tree that has all the
leaves of the source trees as its leaves and the relationships between the
leaves are as consistent with the source trees as possible. This leads to an
optimization problem that is computationally challenging and typically
heuristic methods, such as matrix representation with parsimony (MRP), are
used. In this paper we consider the use of answer set programming to solve the
supertree construction problem in terms of two alternative encodings. The first
is based on an existing encoding of trees using substructures known as
quartets, while the other novel encoding captures the relationships present in
trees through direct projections. We use these encodings to compute a
genus-level supertree for the family of cats (Felidae). Furthermore, we compare
our results to recent supertrees obtained by the MRP method.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP),
Proceedings of ICLP 201
Strong Equivalence of Logic Programs with Abstract Constraint Atoms
Abstract. Logic programs with abstract constraint atoms provide a unifying framework for studying logic programs with various kinds of constraints. Establishing strong equivalence between logic programs is a key property for program maintenance and optimization, and for guaranteeing the same behavior for a revised original program in any context. In this paper, we study strong equivalence of logic programs with abstract constraint atoms. We first give a general characterization of strong equivalence based on a new definition of program reduct for logic programs with abstract constraints. Then we consider a particular kind of program revision-constraint replacements addressing the question: under what conditions can a constraint in a program be replaced by other constraints, so that the resulting program is strongly equivalent to the original one
Constraint Satisfaction Techniques for Combinatorial Problems
The last two decades have seen extraordinary advances in tools and techniques for constraint satisfaction. These advances have in turn created great interest in their industrial applications. As a result, tools and techniques are often tailored to meet the needs of industrial applications out of the box. We claim that in the case of abstract combinatorial problems in discrete mathematics, the standard tools and techniques require special considerations in order to be applied effectively. The main objective of this thesis is to help researchers in discrete mathematics weave through the landscape of constraint satisfaction techniques in order to pick the right tool for the job. We consider constraint satisfaction paradigms like satisfiability of Boolean formulas and answer set programming, and techniques like symmetry breaking. Our contributions range from theoretical results to practical issues regarding tool applications to combinatorial problems.
We prove search-versus-decision complexity results for problems about backbones and backdoors of Boolean formulas.
We consider applications of constraint satisfaction techniques to problems in graph arrowing (specifically in Ramsey and Folkman theory) and computational social choice. Our contributions show how applying constraint satisfaction techniques to abstract combinatorial problems poses additional challenges. We show how these challenges can be addressed. Additionally, we consider the issue of trusting the results of applying constraint satisfaction techniques to combinatorial problems by relying on verified computations