5,125 research outputs found
Pattern Matching and Consensus Problems on Weighted Sequences and Profiles
We study pattern matching problems on two major representations of uncertain
sequences used in molecular biology: weighted sequences (also known as position
weight matrices, PWM) and profiles (i.e., scoring matrices). In the simple
version, in which only the pattern or only the text is uncertain, we obtain
efficient algorithms with theoretically-provable running times using a
variation of the lookahead scoring technique. We also consider a general
variant of the pattern matching problems in which both the pattern and the text
are uncertain. Central to our solution is a special case where the sequences
have equal length, called the consensus problem. We propose algorithms for the
consensus problem parameterized by the number of strings that match one of the
sequences. As our basic approach, a careful adaptation of the classic
meet-in-the-middle algorithm for the knapsack problem is used. On the lower
bound side, we prove that our dependence on the parameter is optimal up to
lower-order terms conditioned on the optimality of the original algorithm for
the knapsack problem.Comment: 22 page
Selfish Knapsack
We consider a selfish variant of the knapsack problem. In our version, the
items are owned by agents, and each agent can misrepresent the set of items she
owns---either by avoiding reporting some of them (understating), or by
reporting additional ones that do not exist (overstating). Each agent's
objective is to maximize, within the items chosen for inclusion in the
knapsack, the total valuation of her own chosen items. The knapsack problem, in
this context, seeks to minimize the worst-case approximation ratio for social
welfare at equilibrium. We show that a randomized greedy mechanism has
attractive strategic properties: in general, it has a correlated price of
anarchy of (subject to a mild assumption). For overstating-only agents, it
becomes strategyproof; we also provide a matching lower bound of on the
(worst-case) approximation ratio attainable by randomized strategyproof
mechanisms, and show that no deterministic strategyproof mechanism can provide
any constant approximation ratio. We also deal with more specialized
environments. For the case of understating-only agents, we provide a
randomized strategyproof -approximate
mechanism, and a lower bound of . When all
agents but one are honest, we provide a deterministic strategyproof
-approximate mechanism with a matching
lower bound. Finally, we consider a model where agents can misreport their
items' properties rather than existence. Specifically, each agent owns a single
item, whose value-to-size ratio is publicly known, but whose actual value and
size are not. We show that an adaptation of the greedy mechanism is
strategyproof and -approximate, and provide a matching lower bound; we also
show that no deterministic strategyproof mechanism can provide a constant
approximation ratio
- β¦