On well-defined kinematic metric functions

This paper presents both formal as well as practical well-definedness conditions for kinematic metric functions. To formulate these conditions, we introduce an intrinsic definition of a rigid body's configuration space. Based on this definition, the principle of objectivity is introduced to derive a formal condition for well-definedness of kinematic metric functions, as well as to gain physical insight into left, right and bi-invariances on the Lie group SE(3). We then relate the abstract notion of objectivity to the more intuitive notion of frame-invariance, and show that frame-invariance can be used as a practical condition for determining objective functions. Examples demonstrate the utility of objectivity and frame-invariance

Complementarity of Kinematics and Geometry in General Relativity Theory

Relations between kinematics, geometry and law of reference frame motion are considered. We show, that kinematical tensors define geometry up to a space functional arbitrariness when integrability condition for spin tensor is satisfied. Some aspects of geometrization principle and geometrical conventionalism of Poincare are discussed in a light of the obtained results.Comment: The paper is developed version of talk, presented at the conference RusGrav-2010 (June 2010, Moscow), submitted to GR

Kinematic space for conical defects

Kinematic space can be used as an intermediate step in the AdS/CFT dictionary and lends itself naturally to the description of diffeomorphism invariant quantities. From the bulk it has been defined as the space of boundary anchored geodesics, and from the boundary as the space of pairs of CFT points. When the bulk is not globally AdS$_3$ the appearance of non-minimal geodesics leads to ambiguities in these definitions. In this work conical defect spacetimes are considered as an example where non-minimal geodesics are common. From the bulk it is found that the conical defect kinematic space can be obtained from the AdS$_3$ kinematic space by the same quotient under which one obtains the defect from AdS$_3$. The resulting kinematic space is one of many equivalent fundamental regions. From the boundary the conical defect kinematic space can be determined by breaking up OPE blocks into contributions from individual bulk geodesics. A duality is established between partial OPE blocks and bulk fields integrated over individual geodesics, minimal or non-minimal.Comment: 29 pages, 9 figures. As published in JHE

A proposal for analyzing the classical limit of kinematic loop gravity

We analyze the classical limit of kinematic loop quantum gravity in which the diffeomorphism and hamiltonian constraints are ignored. We show that there are no quantum states in which the primary variables of the loop approach, namely the SU(2) holonomies along {\em all} possible loops, approximate their classical counterparts. At most a countable number of loops must be specified. To preserve spatial covariance, we choose this set of loops to be based on physical lattices specified by the quasi-classical states themselves. We construct ``macroscopic'' operators based on such lattices and propose that these operators be used to analyze the classical limit. Thus, our aim is to approximate classical data using states in which appropriate macroscopic operators have low quantum fluctuations. Although, in principle, the holonomies of `large' loops on these lattices could be used to analyze the classical limit, we argue that it may be simpler to base the analysis on an alternate set of ``flux'' based operators. We explicitly construct candidate quasi-classical states in 2 spatial dimensions and indicate how these constructions may generalize to 3d. We discuss the less robust aspects of our proposal with a view towards possible modifications. Finally, we show that our proposal also applies to the diffeomorphism invariant Rovelli model which couples a matter reference system to the Hussain Kucha{\v r} model.Comment: Replaced with substantially revised versio

On the resolution of the big bang singularity in isotropic Loop Quantum Cosmology

In contrast to previous work in the field, we construct the Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC) of the flat isotropic model with a massless scalar field in the absence of higher order curvature corrections to the gravitational part of the Hamiltonian constraint. The matter part of the constraint contains the inverse triad operator which can be quantized with or without the use of a Thiemann- like procedure. With the latter choice, we show that the LQC quantization is identical to that of the standard Wheeler DeWitt theory (WDW) wherein there is no singularity resolution. We argue that the former choice leads to singularity resolution in the sense of a well defined, regular (backward) evolution through and beyond the epoch where the size of the universe vanishes. Our work along with that of the seminal work of Ashtekar, Pawlowski and Singh (APS) clarifies the role, in singularity resolution, of the three `exotic' structures in this LQC model, namely: curvature corrections, inverse triad definitions and the `polymer' nature of the kinematic representation. We also critically examine certain technical assumptions made by APS in their analysis of WDW semiclassical states and point out some problems stemming from the infrared behaviour of their wave functionsComment: 26 pages, no figure

Kinematic quantities of finite elastic and plastic deformation

Kinematic quantities for finite elastic and plastic deformations are defined via an approach that does not rely on auxiliary elements like reference frame and reference configuration, and that gives account of the inertial-noninertial aspects explicitly. These features are achieved by working on Galilean spacetime directly. The quantity expressing elastic deformations is introduced according to its expected role: to measure how different the current metric is from the relaxed/stressless metric. Further, the plastic kinematic quantity is the change rate of the stressless metric. The properties of both are analyzed, and their relationship to frequently used elastic and plastic kinematic quantities is discussed. One important result is that no objective elastic or plastic quantities can be defined from deformation gradient.Comment: v5: minor changes, one section moved to an Appendix, 26 pages, 2 figure