2,303 research outputs found
One-Counter Stochastic Games
We study the computational complexity of basic decision problems for
one-counter simple stochastic games (OC-SSGs), under various objectives.
OC-SSGs are 2-player turn-based stochastic games played on the transition graph
of classic one-counter automata. We study primarily the termination objective,
where the goal of one player is to maximize the probability of reaching counter
value 0, while the other player wishes to avoid this. Partly motivated by the
goal of understanding termination objectives, we also study certain "limit" and
"long run average" reward objectives that are closely related to some
well-studied objectives for stochastic games with rewards. Examples of problems
we address include: does player 1 have a strategy to ensure that the counter
eventually hits 0, i.e., terminates, almost surely, regardless of what player 2
does? Or that the liminf (or limsup) counter value equals infinity with a
desired probability? Or that the long run average reward is >0 with desired
probability? We show that the qualitative termination problem for OC-SSGs is in
NP intersection coNP, and is in P-time for 1-player OC-SSGs, or equivalently
for one-counter Markov Decision Processes (OC-MDPs). Moreover, we show that
quantitative limit problems for OC-SSGs are in NP intersection coNP, and are in
P-time for 1-player OC-MDPs. Both qualitative limit problems and qualitative
termination problems for OC-SSGs are already at least as hard as Condon's
quantitative decision problem for finite-state SSGs.Comment: 20 pages, 1 figure. This is a full version of a paper accepted for
publication in proceedings of FSTTCS 201
Looking at Mean-Payoff through Foggy Windows
Mean-payoff games (MPGs) are infinite duration two-player zero-sum games
played on weighted graphs. Under the hypothesis of perfect information, they
admit memoryless optimal strategies for both players and can be solved in
NP-intersect-coNP. MPGs are suitable quantitative models for open reactive
systems. However, in this context the assumption of perfect information is not
always realistic. For the partial-observation case, the problem that asks if
the first player has an observation-based winning strategy that enforces a
given threshold on the mean-payoff, is undecidable. In this paper, we study the
window mean-payoff objectives that were introduced recently as an alternative
to the classical mean-payoff objectives. We show that, in sharp contrast to the
classical mean-payoff objectives, some of the window mean-payoff objectives are
decidable in games with partial-observation
Average-energy games
Two-player quantitative zero-sum games provide a natural framework to
synthesize controllers with performance guarantees for reactive systems within
an uncontrollable environment. Classical settings include mean-payoff games,
where the objective is to optimize the long-run average gain per action, and
energy games, where the system has to avoid running out of energy.
We study average-energy games, where the goal is to optimize the long-run
average of the accumulated energy. We show that this objective arises naturally
in several applications, and that it yields interesting connections with
previous concepts in the literature. We prove that deciding the winner in such
games is in NP inter coNP and at least as hard as solving mean-payoff games,
and we establish that memoryless strategies suffice to win. We also consider
the case where the system has to minimize the average-energy while maintaining
the accumulated energy within predefined bounds at all times: this corresponds
to operating with a finite-capacity storage for energy. We give results for
one-player and two-player games, and establish complexity bounds and memory
requirements.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2015, arXiv:1509.0685
Energy Parity Games
Energy parity games are infinite two-player turn-based games played on
weighted graphs. The objective of the game combines a (qualitative) parity
condition with the (quantitative) requirement that the sum of the weights
(i.e., the level of energy in the game) must remain positive. Beside their own
interest in the design and synthesis of resource-constrained omega-regular
specifications, energy parity games provide one of the simplest model of games
with combined qualitative and quantitative objective. Our main results are as
follows: (a) exponential memory is necessary and sufficient for winning
strategies in energy parity games; (b) the problem of deciding the winner in
energy parity games can be solved in NP \cap coNP; and (c) we give an algorithm
to solve energy parity by reduction to energy games. We also show that the
problem of deciding the winner in energy parity games is polynomially
equivalent to the problem of deciding the winner in mean-payoff parity games,
while optimal strategies may require infinite memory in mean-payoff parity
games. As a consequence we obtain a conceptually simple algorithm to solve
mean-payoff parity games
On the complexity of heterogeneous multidimensional quantitative games
In this paper, we study two-player zero-sum turn-based games played on a
finite multidimensional weighted graph. In recent papers all dimensions use the
same measure, whereas here we allow to combine different measures. Such
heterogeneous multidimensional quantitative games provide a general and natural
model for the study of reactive system synthesis. We focus on classical
measures like the Inf, Sup, LimInf, and LimSup of the weights seen along the
play, as well as on the window mean-payoff (WMP) measure. This new measure is a
natural strengthening of the mean-payoff measure. We allow objectives defined
as Boolean combinations of heterogeneous constraints. While multidimensional
games with Boolean combinations of mean-payoff constraints are undecidable, we
show that the problem becomes EXPTIME-complete for DNF/CNF Boolean combinations
of heterogeneous measures taken among {WMP, Inf, Sup, LimInf, LimSup} and that
exponential memory strategies are sufficient for both players to win. We
provide a detailed study of the complexity and the memory requirements when the
Boolean combination of the measures is replaced by an intersection.
EXPTIME-completeness and exponential memory strategies still hold for the
intersection of measures in {WMP, Inf, Sup, LimInf, LimSup}, and we get
PSPACE-completeness when WMP measure is no longer considered. To avoid
EXPTIME-or PSPACE-hardness, we impose at most one occurrence of WMP measure and
fix the number of Sup measures, and we propose several refinements (on the
number of occurrences of the other measures) for which we get polynomial
algorithms and lower memory requirements. For all the considered classes of
games, we also study parameterized complexity
- …