Two harmonic Jacobi--Davidson methods for computing a partial generalized singular value decomposition of a large matrix pair

Two harmonic extraction based Jacobi--Davidson (JD) type algorithms are proposed to compute a partial generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD) of a large regular matrix pair. They are called cross product-free (CPF) and inverse-free (IF) harmonic JDGSVD algorithms, abbreviated as CPF-HJDGSVD and IF-HJDGSVD, respectively. Compared with the standard extraction based JDGSVD algorithm, the harmonic extraction based algorithms converge more regularly and suit better for computing GSVD components corresponding to interior generalized singular values. Thick-restart CPF-HJDGSVD and IF-HJDGSVD algorithms with some deflation and purgation techniques are developed to compute more than one GSVD components. Numerical experiments confirm the superiority of CPF-HJDGSVD and IF-HJDGSVD to the standard extraction based JDGSVD algorithm.Comment: 24 pages, 5 figure

Fixing Nonconvergence of Algebraic Iterative Reconstruction with an Unmatched Backprojector

We consider algebraic iterative reconstruction methods with applications in image reconstruction. In particular, we are concerned with methods based on an unmatched projector/backprojector pair; i.e., the backprojector is not the exact adjoint or transpose of the forward projector. Such situations are common in large-scale computed tomography, and we consider the common situation where the method does not converge due to the nonsymmetry of the iteration matrix. We propose a modified algorithm that incorporates a small shift parameter, and we give the conditions that guarantee convergence of this method to a fixed point of a slightly perturbed problem. We also give perturbation bounds for this fixed point. Moreover, we discuss how to use Krylov subspace methods to efficiently estimate the leftmost eigenvalue of a certain matrix to select a proper shift parameter. The modified algorithm is illustrated with test problems from computed tomography

The joint bidiagonalization of a matrix pair with inaccurate inner iterations

The joint bidiagonalization (JBD) process iteratively reduces a matrix pair $\{A,L\}$ to two bidiagonal forms simultaneously, which can be used for computing a partial generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD) of $\{A,L\}$. The process has a nested inner-outer iteration structure, where the inner iteration usually can not be computed exactly. In this paper, we study the inaccurately computed inner iterations of JBD by first investigating influence of computational error of the inner iteration on the outer iteration, and then proposing a reorthogonalized JBD (rJBD) process to keep orthogonality of a part of Lanczos vectors. An error analysis of the rJBD is carried out to build up connections with Lanczos bidiagonalizations. The results are then used to investigate convergence and accuracy of the rJBD based GSVD computation. It is shown that the accuracy of computed GSVD components depend on the computing accuracy of inner iterations and condition number of $(A^T,L^T)^T$ while the convergence rate is not affected very much. For practical JBD based GSVD computations, our results can provide a guideline for choosing a proper computing accuracy of inner iterations in order to obtain approximate GSVD components with a desired accuracy. Numerical experiments are made to confirm our theoretical results

Theoretical and Computable Optimal Subspace Expansions for Matrix Eigenvalue Problems

Consider the optimal subspace expansion problem for the matrix eigenvalue problem $Ax=\lambda x$: {\em Which vector $w_{opt}$ in the current subspace $\mathcal{V}$, after multiplied by $A$, provides an optimal subspace expansion for approximating a desired eigenvector $x$ in the sense that $x$ has the smallest angle with the expanded subspace $\mathcal{V}_w=\mathcal{V}+{\rm span}\{Aw\}$, i.e., $w_{opt}=\arg\max_{w\in\mathcal{V}}\cos\angle(\mathcal{V}_w,x)$}? This problem is important as many iterative methods construct nested subspaces that successively expand $\mathcal{V}$ to $\mathcal{V}_w$. Ye ({\em Linear Algebra Appl.}, 428 (2008), p. 911--918) derives an expression of $w_{opt}$ for $A$ general, but it could not be exploited to construct a computable (nearly) optimally expanded subspace. He turns to deriving a maximization characterization of $\cos\angle(\mathcal{V}_w,x)$ for a {\em given} $w\in \mathcal{V}$ when $A$ is Hermitian, but his proof and analysis cannot extend to the non-Hermitian case. We generalize Ye's maximization characterization to the general case and find its maximizer. Our main contributions consist of explicit expressions of $w_{opt}$, $(I-P_V)Aw_{opt}$ and the optimally expanded subspace $\mathcal{V}_{w_{opt}}$ for $A$ general, where $P_V$ is the orthogonal projector onto $\mathcal{V}$. These results can be fully exploited to obtain computable optimally expanded subspaces $\mathcal{V}_{\widetilde{w}_{opt}}$ within the framework of the standard, harmonic, refined, and refined harmonic Rayleigh--Ritz methods.Comment: 20 pages, 3 figure

A parallel implementation of Davidson methods for large-scale eigenvalue problems in SLEPc

In the context of large-scale eigenvalue problems, methods of Davidson type such as Jacobi-Davidson can be competitive with respect to other types of algorithms, especially in some particularly difficult situations such as computing interior eigenvalues or when matrix factorization is prohibitive or highly inefficient. However, these types of methods are not generally available in the form of high-quality parallel implementations, especially for the case of non-Hermitian eigenproblems. We present our implementation of various Davidson-type methods in SLEPc, the Scalable Library for Eigenvalue Problem Computations. The solvers incorporate many algorithmic variants for subspace expansion and extraction, and cover a wide range of eigenproblems including standard and generalized, Hermitian and non-Hermitian, with either real or complex arithmetic. We provide performance results on a large battery of test problems.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion under project TIN2009-07519. Author's addresses: E. Romero, Institut I3M, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Cami de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain), and J. E. Roman, Departament de Sistemes Informatics i Computacio, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Cami de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain; email: [email protected] Alcalde, E.; Román Moltó, JE. (2014). A parallel implementation of Davidson methods for large-scale eigenvalue problems in SLEPc. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 40(2):13:01-13:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2543696S13:0113:29402P. Arbenz, M. Becka, R. Geus, U. Hetmaniuk, and T. Mengotti. 2006. On a parallel multilevel preconditioned Maxwell eigensolver. Parallel Comput. 32, 2, 157--165.Z. Bai, J. Demmel, J. Dongarra, A. Ruhe, and H. van der Vorst, Eds. 2000. Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.C. G. Baker, U. L. Hetmaniuk, R. B. Lehoucq, and H. K. Thornquist. 2009. Anasazi software for the numerical solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 36, 3, 13:1--13:23.S. Balay, J. Brown, K. Buschelman, V. Eijkhout, W. Gropp, D. Kaushik, M. Knepley, L. C. McInnes, B. Smith, and H. Zhang. 2011. PETSc users manual. Tech. Rep. ANL-95/11-Revision 3.2, Argonne National Laboratory.S. Balay, W. D. Gropp, L. C. McInnes, and B. F. Smith. 1997. Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. In Modern Software Tools in Scientific Computing, E. Arge, A. M. Bruaset, and H. P. Langtangen, Eds., Birkhaüser, 163--202.M. A. Brebner and J. Grad. 1982. Eigenvalues of Ax =λ Bx for real symmetric matrices A and B computed by reduction to a pseudosymmetric form and the HR process. Linear Algebra Appl. 43, 99--118.C. Campos, J. E. Roman, E. Romero, and A. Tomas. 2011. SLEPc users manual. Tech. Rep. DSICII/24/02 - Revision 3.2, D. Sistemes Informàtics i Computació, Universitat Politècnica de València. http://www.grycap.upv.es/slepc.T. Dannert and F. Jenko. 2005. Gyrokinetic simulation of collisionless trapped-electronmode turbulence. Phys. Plasmas 12, 7, 072309.E. R. Davidson. 1975. The iterative calculation of a few of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices. J. Comput. Phys. 17, 1, 87--94.T. A. Davis and Y. Hu. 2011. The University of Florida Sparse Matrix Collection. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 38, 1, 1:1--1:25.H. C. Elman, A. Ramage, and D. J. Silvester. 2007. Algorithm 866: IFISS, a Matlab toolbox for modelling incompressible flow. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 33, 2. Article 14.T. Ericsson and A. Ruhe. 1980. The spectral transformation Lanczos method for the numerical solution of large sparse generalized symmetric eigenvalue problems. Math. Comp. 35, 152, 1251--1268.M. Ferronato, C. Janna, and G. Pini. 2012. Efficient parallel solution to large-size sparse eigenproblems with block FSAI preconditioning. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 19, 5, 797--815.D. R. Fokkema, G. L. G. Sleijpen, and H. A. van der Vorst. 1998. Jacobi--Davidson style QR and QZ algorithms for the reduction of matrix pencils. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20, 1, 94--125.M. A. Freitag and A. Spence. 2007. Convergence theory for inexact inverse iteration applied to the generalised nonsymmetric eigenproblem. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 28, 40--64.M. Genseberger. 2010. Improving the parallel performance of a domain decomposition preconditioning technique in the Jacobi-Davidson method for large scale eigenvalue problems. App. Numer. Math. 60, 11, 1083--1099.V. Hernandez, J. E. Roman, and A. Tomas. 2007. Parallel Arnoldi eigensolvers with enhanced scalability via global communications rearrangement. Parallel Comput. 33, 7--8, 521--540.V. Hernandez, J. E. Roman, and V. Vidal. 2005. SLEPc: A scalable and flexible toolkit for the solution of eigenvalue problems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31, 3, 351--362.V. Heuveline, B. Philippe, and M. Sadkane. 1997. Parallel computation of spectral portrait of large matrices by Davidson type methods. Numer. Algor. 16, 1, 55--75.M. E. Hochstenbach. 2005a. Generalizations of harmonic and refined Rayleigh-Ritz. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 20, 235--252.M. E. Hochstenbach. 2005b. Variations on harmonic Rayleigh--Ritz for standard and generalized eigenproblems. Preprint, Department of Mathematics, Case Western Reserve University.M. E. Hochstenbach and Y. Notay. 2006. The Jacobi--Davidson method. GAMM Mitt. 29, 2, 368--382.F.-N. Hwang, Z.-H. Wei, T.-M. Huang, and W. Wang. 2010. A parallel additive Schwarz preconditioned Jacobi-Davidson algorithm for polynomial eigenvalue problems in quantum dot simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 8, 2932--2947.A. V. Knyazev. 2001. Toward the optimal preconditioned eigensolver: Locally optimal block preconditioned conjugate gradient method. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 2, 517--541.A. V. Knyazev, M. E. Argentati, I. Lashuk, and E. E. Ovtchinnikov. 2007. Block Locally Optimal Preconditioned Eigenvalue Xolvers (BLOPEX) in HYPRE and PETSc. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29, 5, 2224--2239.J. Kopal, M. Rozložník, M. Tuma, and A. Smoktunowicz. 2012. Rounding error analysis of orthogonalization with a non-standard inner product. Numer. Math. 52, 4, 1035--1058.D. Kressner. 2006. Block algorithms for reordering standard and generalized Schur forms. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 32, 4, 521--532.R. B. Lehoucq, D. C. Sorensen, and C. Yang. 1998. ARPACK Users' Guide, Solution of Large-Scale Eigenvalue Problems by Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.Z. Li, Y. Saad, and M. Sosonkina. 2003. pARMS: a parallel version of the algebraic recursive multilevel solver. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 5--6, 485--509.J. R. McCombs and A. Stathopoulos. 2006. Iterative validation of eigensolvers: a scheme for improving the reliability of Hermitian eigenvalue solvers. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28, 6, 2337--2358.F. Merz, C. Kowitz, E. Romero, J. E. Roman, and F. Jenko. 2012. Multi-dimensional gyrokinetic parameter studies based on eigenvalues computations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 4, 922--930.R. B. Morgan. 1990. Davidson's method and preconditioning for generalized eigenvalue problems. J. Comput. Phys. 89, 241--245.R. B. Morgan. 1991. Computing interior eigenvalues of large matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 154--156, 289--309.R. B. Morgan and D. S. Scott. 1986. Generalizations of Davidson's method for computing eigenvalues of sparse symmetric matrices. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 7, 3, 817--825.R. Natarajan and D. Vanderbilt. 1989. A new iterative scheme for obtaining eigenvectors of large, real-symmetric matrices. J. Comput. Phys. 82, 1, 218--228.M. Nool and A. van der Ploeg. 2000. A parallel Jacobi--Davidson-type method for solving large generalized eigenvalue problems in magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22, 1, 95--112.J. Olsen, P. Jørgensen, and J. Simons. 1990. Passing the one-billion limit in full configuration-interaction (FCI) calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 169, 6, 463--472.C. C. Paige, B. N. Parlett, and H. A. van der Vorst. 1995. Approximate solutions and eigenvalue bounds from Krylov subspaces. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 2, 2, 115--133.E. Romero and J. E. Roman. 2011. Computing subdominant unstable modes of turbulent plasma with a parallel Jacobi--Davidson eigensolver. Concur. Comput.: Pract. Exp. 23, 17, 2179--2191.Y. Saad. 1993. A flexible inner-outer preconditioned GMRES algorithm. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14, 2, 461--469.G. L. G. Sleijpen, A. G. L. Booten, D. R. Fokkema, and H. A. van der Vorst. 1996. Jacobi-Davidson type methods for generalized eigenproblems and polynomial eigenproblems. BIT 36, 3, 595--633.G. L. G. Sleijpen and H. A. van der Vorst. 1996. A Jacobi--Davidson iteration method for linear eigenvalue problems. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 17, 2, 401--425.G. L. G. Sleijpen and H. A. van der Vorst. 2000. A Jacobi--Davidson iteration method for linear eigenvalue problems. SIAM Rev. 42, 2, 267--293.G. L. G. Sleijpen, H. A. van der Vorst, and E. Meijerink. 1998. Efficient expansion of subspaces in the Jacobi--Davidson method for standard and generalized eigenproblems. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 7, 75--89.A. Stathopoulos. 2007. Nearly optimal preconditioned methods for Hermitian eigenproblems under limited memory. Part I: Seeking one eigenvalue. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29, 2, 481--514.A. Stathopoulos and J. R. McCombs. 2007. Nearly optimal preconditioned methods for Hermitian eigenproblems under limited memory. Part II: Seeking many eigenvalues. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29, 5, 2162--2188.A. Stathopoulos and J. R. McCombs. 2010. PRIMME: PReconditioned Iterative MultiMethod Eigensolver: Methods and software description. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 37, 2, 21:1--21:30.A. Stathopoulos and Y. Saad. 1998. Restarting techniques for the (Jacobi-)Davidson symmetric eigenvalue methods. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 7, 163--181.A. Stathopoulos, Y. Saad, and C. F. Fischer. 1995. Robust preconditioning of large, sparse, symmetric eigenvalue problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 64, 3, 197--215.A. Stathopoulos, Y. Saad, and K. Wu. 1998. Dynamic thick restarting of the Davidson, and the implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19, 1, 227--245.G. W. Stewart. 2001. Matrix Algorithms. Volume II: Eigensystems. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.H. A. van der Vorst. 2002. Computational methods for large eigenvalue problems. In Handbook of Numerical Analysis, P. G. Ciarlet and J. L. Lions, Eds., Vol. VIII, Elsevier, 3--179.H. A. van der Vorst. 2004. Modern methods for the iterative computation of eigenpairs of matrices of high dimension. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 84, 7, 444--451.T. van Noorden and J. Rommes 2007. Computing a partial generalized real Schur form using the Jacobi--Davidson method. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 14, 3, 197--215.T. D. Young, E. Romero, and J. E. Roman. 2013. Parallel finite element density functional computations exploiting grid refinement and subspace recycling. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1, 66--72

A Jacobi–Davidson type method for the generalized singular value problem

AbstractWe discuss a new method for the iterative computation of some of the generalized singular values and vectors of a large sparse matrix. Our starting point is the augmented matrix formulation of the GSVD. The subspace expansion is performed by (approximately) solving a Jacobi–Davidson type correction equation, while we give several alternatives for the subspace extraction. Numerical experiments illustrate the performance of the method