8 research outputs found

    Colourings of (m,n)(m, n)-coloured mixed graphs

    Full text link
    A mixed graph is, informally, an object obtained from a simple undirected graph by choosing an orientation for a subset of its edges. A mixed graph is (m,n)(m, n)-coloured if each edge is assigned one of m0m \geq 0 colours, and each arc is assigned one of n0n \geq 0 colours. Oriented graphs are (0,1)(0, 1)-coloured mixed graphs, and 2-edge-coloured graphs are (2,0)(2, 0)-coloured mixed graphs. We show that results of Sopena for vertex colourings of oriented graphs, and of Kostochka, Sopena and Zhu for vertex colourings oriented graphs and 2-edge-coloured graphs, are special cases of results about vertex colourings of (m,n)(m, n)-coloured mixed graphs. Both of these can be regarded as a version of Brooks' Theorem.Comment: 7 pages, no figure

    Oriented Colouring Graphs of Bounded Degree and Degeneracy

    Full text link
    This paper considers upper bounds on the oriented chromatic number, χo\chi_o, of graphs in terms of their maximum degree Δ\Delta and/or their degeneracy dd. In particular we show that asymptotically, χoχ2f(d)2d\chi_o \leq \chi_2 f(d) 2^d where f(d)(1log2(e)1+ϵ)d2f(d) \geq (\frac{1}{\log_2(e) -1} + \epsilon) d^2 and χ22f(d)d\chi_2 \leq 2^{\frac{f(d)}{d}}. This improves a result of MacGillivray, Raspaud, and Swartz of the form χo2χ21\chi_o \leq 2^{\chi_2} -1. The rest of the paper is devoted to improving prior bounds for χo\chi_o in terms of Δ\Delta and dd by refining the asymptotic arguments involved.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figure

    On the existence and non-existence of improper homomorphisms of oriented and 22-edge-coloured graphs to reflexive targets

    Full text link
    We consider non-trivial homomorphisms to reflexive oriented graphs in which some pair of adjacent vertices have the same image. Using a notion of convexity for oriented graphs, we study those oriented graphs that do not admit such homomorphisms. We fully classify those oriented graphs with tree-width 22 that do not admit such homomorphisms and show that it is NP-complete to decide if a graph admits an orientation that does not admit such homomorphisms. We prove analogous results for 22-edge-coloured graphs. We apply our results on oriented graphs to provide a new tool in the study of chromatic number of orientations of planar graphs -- a long-standing open problem

    On (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic numbers of graphs having bounded sparsity parameters

    Full text link
    An (n,m)(n,m)-graph is characterised by having nn types of arcs and mm types of edges. A homomorphism of an (n,m)(n,m)-graph GG to an (n,m)(n,m)-graph HH, is a vertex mapping that preserves adjacency, direction, and type. The (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number of GG, denoted by χn,m(G)\chi_{n,m}(G), is the minimum value of V(H)|V(H)| such that there exists a homomorphism of GG to HH. The theory of homomorphisms of (n,m)(n,m)-graphs have connections with graph theoretic concepts like harmonious coloring, nowhere-zero flows; with other mathematical topics like binary predicate logic, Coxeter groups; and has application to the Query Evaluation Problem (QEP) in graph database. In this article, we show that the arboricity of GG is bounded by a function of χn,m(G)\chi_{n,m}(G) but not the other way around. Additionally, we show that the acyclic chromatic number of GG is bounded by a function of χn,m(G)\chi_{n,m}(G), a result already known in the reverse direction. Furthermore, we prove that the (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number for the family of graphs with a maximum average degree less than 2+24(2n+m)12+ \frac{2}{4(2n+m)-1}, including the subfamily of planar graphs with girth at least 8(2n+m)8(2n+m), equals 2(2n+m)+12(2n+m)+1. This improves upon previous findings, which proved the (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number for planar graphs with girth at least 10(2n+m)410(2n+m)-4 is 2(2n+m)+12(2n+m)+1. It is established that the (n,m)(n,m)-chromatic number for the family T2\mathcal{T}_2 of partial 22-trees is both bounded below and above by quadratic functions of (2n+m)(2n+m), with the lower bound being tight when (2n+m)=2(2n+m)=2. We prove 14χ(0,3)(T2)1514 \leq \chi_{(0,3)}(\mathcal{T}_2) \leq 15 and 14χ(1,1)(T2)2114 \leq \chi_{(1,1)}(\mathcal{T}_2) \leq 21 which improves both known lower bounds and the former upper bound. Moreover, for the latter upper bound, to the best of our knowledge we provide the first theoretical proof.Comment: 18 page

    EUROCOMB 21 Book of extended abstracts

    Get PDF

    On Chromatic Number of Colored Mixed Graphs

    No full text
    An (m, n)-colored mixed graph G is a graph with its arcs having one of the m different colors and edges having one of the n different colors. A homomorphism f of an (m, n)-colored mixed graph G to an (m, n)-colored mixed graph H is a vertex mapping such that if uv is an arc (edge) of color c in G, then f (u)f (v) is an arc (edge) of color c in H. The (m,n)-colored mixed chromatic number x((m,n))(G) of an (m, n)-colored mixed graph G is the order (number of vertices) of a smallest homomorphic image of G. This notion was introduced by Nektfil and Raspaud (2000, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B 80, 147-155). They showed that x((m,n))(G) <= k(2m n)(k-1) where G is a acyclic k-colorable graph. We prove the tightness of this bound. We also show that the acyclic chromatic number of a graph is bounded by k(2) k(2+) inverted left perpedicular log((2m+n)) log((2m+n)) k inverted right perpendicular if its (m, n)-colored mixed chromatic number is at most k. Furthermore, using probabilistic method, we show that for connected graphs with maximum degree its (m, n)-colored mixed chromatic number is at most 2(Delta-1)(2m+n) (2m + n)(Delta-min(2m+m3)+2) In particular, the last result directly improves the upper bound of 2 Delta(2)2(Delta) oriented chromatic number of graphs with maximum degree Delta, obtained by Kostochka et al. J. Graph Theory 24, 331-340) to 2(Delta-1)(2)2(Delta). We also show that there exists a connected graph with maximum degree Delta and (m, n)-colored mixed chromatic number at least (2m + n)(Delta/2)
    corecore