The target as an obstacle:Grasping an object at different heights

Humans use a stereotypical movement pattern to grasp a target object. What is the cause of this stereotypical pattern? One of the possible factors is that the target object is considered an obstacle at positions other than the envisioned goal positions for the digits: while each digit aims for a goal position on the target object, they avoid other positions on the target object even if these positions do not obstruct the movement. According to this hypothesis, the maximum grip aperture will be higher if the risk of colliding with the target object is larger. Based on this hypothesis, we made a set of two unique predictions for grasping a vertically oriented cuboid at its sides at different heights. For cuboids of the same height, the maximum grip aperture will be smaller when grasped higher. For cuboids whose height varies with grip height, the maximum grip aperture will be larger when grasped higher. Both predicted relations were experimentally confirmed. This result supports the idea that considering the target object as an obstacle at positions other than the envisioned goal positions for the digits is underlying the stereotypical movement patterns in grasping. The goal positions of the digits thus influence the maximum grip aperture even if the distance between the goal positions on the target object does not change

Grasping Kinematics from the Perspective of the Individual Digits: A Modelling Study

Grasping is a prototype of human motor coordination. Nevertheless, it is not known what determines the typical movement patterns of grasping. One way to approach this issue is by building models. We developed a model based on the movements of the individual digits. In our model the following objectives were taken into account for each digit: move smoothly to the preselected goal position on the object without hitting other surfaces, arrive at about the same time as the other digit and never move too far from the other digit. These objectives were implemented by regarding the tips of the digits as point masses with a spring between them, each attracted to its goal position and repelled from objects' surfaces. Their movements were damped. Using a single set of parameters, our model can reproduce a wider variety of experimental findings than any previous model of grasping. Apart from reproducing known effects (even the angles under which digits approach trapezoidal objects' surfaces, which no other model can explain), our model predicted that the increase in maximum grip aperture with object size should be greater for blocks than for cylinders. A survey of the literature shows that this is indeed how humans behave. The model can also adequately predict how single digit pointing movements are made. This supports the idea that grasping kinematics follow from the movements of the individual digits

Human and robot arm control using the minimum variance principle

Many computational models of human upper limb movement successfully capture some features of human movement, but often lack a compelling biological basis. One that provides such a basis is Harris and Wolpert’s minimum variance model. In this model, the variance of the hand at the end of a movement is minimised, given that the controlling signal is subject to random noise with zero mean and standard deviation proportional to the signal’s amplitude. This criterion offers a consistent explanation for several movement characteristics. This work formulates the minimum variance model into a form suitable for controlling a robot arm. This implementation allows examination of the model properties, specifically its applicability to producing human-like movement. The model is subsequently tested in areas important to studies of human movement and robotics, including reaching, grasping, and action perception. For reaching, experiments show this formulation successfully captures the characteristics of movement, supporting previous results. Reaching is initially performed between two points, but complex trajectories are also investigated through the inclusion of via- points. The addition of a gripper extends the model, allowing production of trajectories for grasping an object. Using the minimum variance principle to derive digit trajectories, a quantitative explanation for the approach of digits to the object surface is provided. These trajectories also exhibit human-like spatial and temporal coordination between hand transport and grip aperture. The model’s predictive ability is further tested in the perception of human demonstrated actions. Through integration with a system that performs perception using its motor system offline, in line with the motor theory of perception, the model is shown to correlate well with data on human perception of movement. These experiments investigate and extend the explanatory and predictive use of the model for human movement, and demonstrate that it can be suitably formulated to produce human-like movement on robot arms.Open acces