Multi-modality cardiac image computing: a survey

Multi-modality cardiac imaging plays a key role in the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. It allows a combination of complementary anatomical, morphological and functional information, increases diagnosis accuracy, and improves the efficacy of cardiovascular interventions and clinical outcomes. Fully-automated processing and quantitative analysis of multi-modality cardiac images could have a direct impact on clinical research and evidence-based patient management. However, these require overcoming significant challenges including inter-modality misalignment and finding optimal methods to integrate information from different modalities. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of multi-modality imaging in cardiology, the computing methods, the validation strategies, the related clinical workflows and future perspectives. For the computing methodologies, we have a favored focus on the three tasks, i.e., registration, fusion and segmentation, which generally involve multi-modality imaging data, either combining information from different modalities or transferring information across modalities. The review highlights that multi-modality cardiac imaging data has the potential of wide applicability in the clinic, such as trans-aortic valve implantation guidance, myocardial viability assessment, and catheter ablation therapy and its patient selection. Nevertheless, many challenges remain unsolved, such as missing modality, modality selection, combination of imaging and non-imaging data, and uniform analysis and representation of different modalities. There is also work to do in defining how the well-developed techniques fit in clinical workflows and how much additional and relevant information they introduce. These problems are likely to continue to be an active field of research and the questions to be answered in the future

Bayesian Inference with Combined Dynamic and Sparsity Models: Application in 3D Electrophysiological Imaging

Data-driven inference is widely encountered in various scientific domains to convert the observed measurements into information that cannot be directly observed about a system. Despite the quickly-developing sensor and imaging technologies, in many domains, data collection remains an expensive endeavor due to financial and physical constraints. To overcome the limits in data and to reduce the demand on expensive data collection, it is important to incorporate prior information in order to place the data-driven inference in a domain-relevant context and to improve its accuracy. Two sources of assumptions have been used successfully in many inverse problem applications. One is the temporal dynamics of the system (dynamic structure). The other is the low-dimensional structure of a system (sparsity structure). In existing work, these two structures have often been explored separately, while in most high-dimensional dynamic system they are commonly co-existing and contain complementary information. In this work, our main focus is to build a robustness inference framework to combine dynamic and sparsity constraints. The driving application in this work is a biomedical inverse problem of electrophysiological (EP) imaging, which noninvasively and quantitatively reconstruct transmural action potentials from body-surface voltage data with the goal to improve cardiac disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. The general framework can be extended to a variety of applications that deal with the inference of high-dimensional dynamic systems

Uncertainty Quantification and Reduction in Cardiac Electrophysiological Imaging

Cardiac electrophysiological (EP) imaging involves solving an inverse problem that infers cardiac electrical activity from body-surface electrocardiography data on a physical domain defined by the body torso. To avoid unreasonable solutions that may fit the data, this inference is often guided by data-independent prior assumptions about different properties of cardiac electrical sources as well as the physical domain. However, these prior assumptions may involve errors and uncertainties that could affect the inference accuracy. For example, common prior assumptions on the source properties, such as fixed spatial and/or temporal smoothness or sparseness assumptions, may not necessarily match the true source property at different conditions, leading to uncertainties in the inference. Furthermore, prior assumptions on the physical domain, such as the anatomy and tissue conductivity of different organs in the thorax model, represent an approximation of the physical domain, introducing errors to the inference. To determine the robustness of the EP imaging systems for future clinical practice, it is important to identify these errors/uncertainties and assess their impact on the solution. This dissertation focuses on the quantification and reduction of the impact of uncertainties caused by prior assumptions/models on cardiac source properties as well as anatomical modeling uncertainties on the EP imaging solution. To assess the effect of fixed prior assumptions/models about cardiac source properties on the solution of EP imaging, we propose a novel yet simple Lp-norm regularization method for volumetric cardiac EP imaging. This study reports the necessity of an adaptive prior model (rather than fixed model) for constraining the complex spatiotemporally changing properties of the cardiac sources. We then propose a multiple-model Bayesian approach to cardiac EP imaging that employs a continuous combination of prior models, each re-effecting a specific spatial property for volumetric sources. The 3D source estimation is then obtained as a weighted combination of solutions across all models. Including a continuous combination of prior models, our proposed method reduces the chance of mismatch between prior models and true source properties, which in turn enhances the robustness of the EP imaging solution. To quantify the impact of anatomical modeling uncertainties on the EP imaging solution, we propose a systematic statistical framework. Founded based on statistical shape modeling and unscented transform, our method quantifies anatomical modeling uncertainties and establish their relation to the EP imaging solution. Applied on anatomical models generated from different image resolutions and different segmentations, it reports the robustness of EP imaging solution to these anatomical shape-detail variations. We then propose a simplified anatomical model for the heart that only incorporates certain subject-specific anatomical parameters, while discarding local shape details. Exploiting less resources and processing for successful EP imaging, this simplified model provides a simple clinically-compatible anatomical modeling experience for EP imaging systems. Different components of our proposed methods are validated through a comprehensive set of synthetic and real-data experiments, including various typical pathological conditions and/or diagnostic procedures, such as myocardial infarction and pacing. Overall, the methods presented in this dissertation for the quantification and reduction of uncertainties in cardiac EP imaging enhance the robustness of EP imaging, helping to close the gap between EP imaging in research and its clinical application

Medical Image Analysis on Left Atrial LGE MRI for Atrial Fibrillation Studies: A Review

Late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE MRI) is commonly used to visualize and quantify left atrial (LA) scars. The position and extent of scars provide important information of the pathophysiology and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). Hence, LA scar segmentation and quantification from LGE MRI can be useful in computer-assisted diagnosis and treatment stratification of AF patients. Since manual delineation can be time-consuming and subject to intra- and inter-expert variability, automating this computing is highly desired, which nevertheless is still challenging and under-researched. This paper aims to provide a systematic review on computing methods for LA cavity, wall, scar and ablation gap segmentation and quantification from LGE MRI, and the related literature for AF studies. Specifically, we first summarize AF-related imaging techniques, particularly LGE MRI. Then, we review the methodologies of the four computing tasks in detail, and summarize the validation strategies applied in each task. Finally, the possible future developments are outlined, with a brief survey on the potential clinical applications of the aforementioned methods. The review shows that the research into this topic is still in early stages. Although several methods have been proposed, especially for LA segmentation, there is still large scope for further algorithmic developments due to performance issues related to the high variability of enhancement appearance and differences in image acquisition.Comment: 23 page

Design and clinical validation of novel imaging strategies for analysis of arrhythmogenic substrate

_CURRENT CHALLENGES IN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY_ Technical advances in cardiovascular electrophysiology have resulted in an increasing number of catheter ablation procedures reaching 200 000 in Europe for the year 2013. These advanced interventions are often complex and time consuming and may cause significant radiation exposure. Furthermore, a substantial number of ablation procedures remain associated with poor (initial) outcomes and frequently require ≥1 redo procedures. Innovations in modalities for substrate imaging could facilitate our understanding of the arrhythmogenic substrate, improve the design of patient-specific ablation strategies and improve the results of ablation procedures. _NOVEL SUBSTRATE IMAGING MODALITIES_ __Cardiac magnetic resonance__ Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can be considered the most comprehensive and suitable modality for the complete electrophysiology and catheter ablation workup (including patient selection, procedural guidance, and [procedural] follow-up). Utilizing inversion recovery CMR, fibrotic myocardium can be visualized and quantified 10–15 min after intravenous administration of Gadolinium contrast. This imaging technique is known as late Gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Experimental models have shown excellent agreement between size and shape in LGE CMR and areas of myocardial infarction by histopathology. Recent studies have also demonstrated how scar size, shape and location from pre-procedural LGE can be useful in guiding ventricular tachycardia’s (VT) ablation or atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. These procedures are often time-consuming due to the preceding electrophysiological mapping study required to identify slow conduction zones involved in re-entry circuits. Post-processed LGE images provide scar maps, which could be integrated with electroanatomic mapping systems to facilitate these procedures. __Inverse potential mapping__ Through the years, various noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging techniques have emerged that estimate epicardial potentials or myocardial activation times from potentials recorded on the thorax. Utilizing an inverse procedure, the potentials on the heart surface or activation times of the myocardium are estimated with the recorded body surface potentials as source data. Although this procedure only estimates the time course of unipolar epicardial electrograms, several studies have demonstrated that the epicardial potentials and electrograms provide substantial information about intramyocardial activity and have great potential to facilitate risk-stratification and generate personalized ablation strategies. __Objectives of this thesis__ 1. To evaluate the utility of cardiac magnetic resonance derived geometrical and tissue characteristic information for patient stratification and guidance of AF ablation. 2. To design and evaluate the performance of a finite element model based inverse potential mapping in predicting the arrhythmogenic focus in idiopathic ventricular tachycardia using invasive electro-anatomical activation mapping as a reference standard

Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications

[EN] The combination of computational models and biophysical simulations can help to interpret an array of experimental data and contribute to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of complex diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias. For this reason, three-dimensional (3D) cardiac computational modelling is currently a rising field of research. The advance of medical imaging technology over the last decades has allowed the evolution from generic to patient-specific 3D cardiac models that faithfully represent the anatomy and different cardiac features of a given alive subject. Here we analyse sixty representative 3D cardiac computational models developed and published during the last fifty years, describing their information sources, features, development methods and online availability. This paper also reviews the necessary components to build a 3D computational model of the heart aimed at biophysical simulation, paying especial attention to cardiac electrophysiology (EP), and the existing approaches to incorporate those components. We assess the challenges associated to the different steps of the building process, from the processing of raw clinical or biological data to the final application, including image segmentation, inclusion of substructures and meshing among others. We briefly outline the personalisation approaches that are currently available in 3D cardiac computational modelling. Finally, we present examples of several specific applications, mainly related to cardiac EP simulation and model-based image analysis, showing the potential usefulness of 3D cardiac computational modelling into clinical environments as a tool to aid in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac diseases.This work was partially supported by the "VI Plan Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica, Desarrollo e Innovacion Tecnologica" from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain (TIN2012-37546-C03-01 and TIN2011-28067) and the European Commission (European Regional Development Funds - ERDF - FEDER) and by "eTorso project" (GVA/2013-001404) from the Generalitat Valenciana (Spain). ALP is financially supported by the program "Ayudas para contratos predoctorales para la formacion de doctores" from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain (BES-2013-064089).López Pérez, AD.; Sebastián Aguilar, R.; Ferrero De Loma-Osorio, JM. (2015). Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 14(35):1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-015-0033-5S1311435Koushanpour E, Collings W: Validation and dynamic applications of an ellipsoid model of the left ventricle. J Appl Physiol 1966, 21: 1655–61.Ghista D, Sandler H: An analytic elastic-viscoelastic model for the shape and the forces in the left ventricle. J Biomech 1969, 2: 35–47.Janz RF, Grimm AF: Finite-Element Model for the Mechanical Behavior of the Left Ventricle: prediction of deformation in the potassium-arrested rat heart. Circ Res 1972, 30: 244–52.Van den Broek JHJM, Van den Broek MHLM: Application of an ellipsoidal heart model in studying left ventricular contractions. J Biomech 1980, 13: 493–503.Colli Franzone P, Guerri L, Pennacchio M, Taccardi B: Spread of excitation in 3-D models of the anisotropic cardiac tissue. II. Effects of fiber architecture and ventricular geometry. Math Biosci 1998, 147: 131–71.Kerckhoffs RCP, Bovendeerd PHM, Kotte JCS, Prinzen FW, Smits K, Arts T: Homogeneity of cardiac contraction despite physiological asynchrony of depolarization: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 2003, 31: 536–47.Sermesant M, Moireau P, Camara O, Sainte-Marie J, Andriantsimiavona R, Cimrman R, et al.: Cardiac function estimation from MRI using a heart model and data assimilation: advances and difficulties. Med Image Anal 2006, 10: 642–56.Okajima M, Fujino T, Kobayashi T, Yamada K: Computer simulation of the propagation process in excitation of the ventricles. Circ Res 1968, 23: 203–11.Horan LG, Hand RC, Johnson JC, Sridharan MR, Rankin TB, Flowers NC: A theoretical examination of ventricular repolarization and the secondary T wave. Circ Res 1978, 42: 750–7.Miller WT, Geselowitz DB: Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram. I. The normal heart. Circ Res 1978, 43: 301–15.Vetter FJ, McCulloch AD: Three-dimensional analysis of regional cardiac function: a model of rabbit ventricular anatomy. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1998, 69: 157–83.Nielsen PMF, LeGrice IJ, Smaill BH, Hunter PJ: Mathematical model of geometry and fibrous structure of the heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1991, 260: H1365–78.Stevens C, Remme E, LeGrice I, Hunter P: Ventricular mechanics in diastole: material parameter sensitivity. J Biomech 2003, 36: 737–48.Aoki M, Okamoto Y, Musha T, Harumi KI: Three-dimensional simulation of the ventricular depolarization and repolarization processes and body surface potentials: normal heart and bundle branch block. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987, 34: 454–62.Thakor NV, Eisenman LN: Three-dimensional computer model of the heart: fibrillation induced by extrastimulation. Comput Biomed Res 1989, 22: 532–45.Freudenberg J, Schiemann T, Tiede U, Höhne KH: Simulation of cardiac excitation patterns in a three-dimensional anatomical heart atlas. Comput Biol Med 2000, 30: 191–205.Trunk P, Mocnik J, Trobec R, Gersak B: 3D heart model for computer simulations in cardiac surgery. Comput Biol Med 2007, 37: 1398–403.Siregar P, Sinteff JP, Julen N, Le Beux P: An interactive 3D anisotropic cellular automata model of the heart. Comput Biomed Res 1998, 31: 323–47.Harrild DM, Henriquez CS: A computer model of normal conduction in the human atria. Circ Res 2000, 87: e25–36.Bodin ON, Kuz’min AV: Synthesis of a realistic model of the surface of the heart. Biomed Eng (NY) 2006, 40: 280–3.Ruiz-Villa CA, Tobón C, Rodríguez JF, Ferrero JM, Hornero F, Saíz J: Influence of atrial dilatation in the generation of re-entries caused by ectopic activity in the left atrium. Comput Cardiol 2009, 36: 457–60.Blanc O, Virag N, Vesin JM, Kappenberger L: A computer model of human atria with reasonable computation load and realistic anatomical properties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001, 48: 1229–37.Zemlin CW, Herzel H, Ho SY, Panfilov AV: A realistic and efficient model of excitation propagation in the human atria. In Comput Simul Exp Assess Card Electrophysiol. Edited by: Virag N, Kappenberger L, Blanc O. Futura Publishing Company, Inc, Arkmonk, New York; 2001:29–34.Seemann G, Höper C, Sachse FB, Dössel O, Holden AV, Zhang H: Heterogeneous three-dimensional anatomical and electrophysiological model of human atria. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2006, 364: 1465–81.Zhao J, Butters TD, Zhang H, LeGrice IJ, Sands GB, Smaill BH: Image-based model of atrial anatomy and electrical activation: a computational platform for investigating atrial arrhythmia. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 18–27.Creswell LL, Wyers SG, Pirolo JS, Perman WH, Vannier MW, Pasque MK: Mathematical modeling of the heart using magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1992, 11: 581–9.Lorange M, Gulrajani RM: A computer heart model incorporating anisotropic propagation: I. Model construction and simulation of normal activation. J Electrocardiol 1993, 26: 245–61.Winslow RL, Scollan DF, Holmes A, Yung CK, Zhang J, Jafri MS: Electrophysiological modeling of cardiac ventricular function: from cell to organ. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000, 2: 119–55.Virag N, Jacquemet V, Henriquez CS, Zozor S, Blanc O, Vesin JM, et al.: Study of atrial arrhythmias in a computer model based on magnetic resonance images of human atria. Chaos 2002, 12: 754–63.Helm PA, Tseng HJ, Younes L, McVeigh ER, Winslow RL: Ex vivo 3D diffusion tensor imaging and quantification of cardiac laminar structure. Magn Reson Med 2005, 54: 850–9.Arevalo HJ, Helm PA, Trayanova NA: Development of a model of the infarcted canine heart that predicts arrhythmia generation from specific cardiac geometry and scar distribution. Comput Cardiol 2008, 35: 497–500.Plotkowiak M, Rodriguez B, Plank G, Schneider JE, Gavaghan D, Kohl P, et al.: High performance computer simulations of cardiac electrical function based on high resolution MRI datasets. In Int Conf Comput Sci 2008, LNCS 5101. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2008:571–80.Heidenreich EA, Ferrero JM, Doblaré M, Rodríguez JF: Adaptive macro finite elements for the numerical solution of monodomain equations in cardiac electrophysiology. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38: 2331–45.Gurev V, Lee T, Constantino J, Arevalo H, Trayanova NA: Models of cardiac electromechanics based on individual hearts imaging data: Image-based electromechanical models of the heart. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2011, 10: 295–306.Deng D, Jiao P, Ye X, Xia L: An image-based model of the whole human heart with detailed anatomical structure and fiber orientation. Comput Math Methods Med 2012, 2012: 16.Aslanidi OV, Nikolaidou T, Zhao J, Smaill BH, Gilbert SH, Holden AV, et al.: Application of micro-computed tomography with iodine staining to cardiac imaging, segmentation, and computational model development. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 8–17.Haddad R, Clarysse P, Orkisz M, Croisille P, Revel D, Magnin IE: A realistic anthropomorphic numerical model of the beating heart. In Funct Imaging Model Heart 2005, LNCS 3504. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2005:384–93.Appleton B, Wei Q, Liu N, Xia L, Crozier S, Liu F, et al.: An electrical heart model incorporating real geometry and motion. In 27th Annu Int Conf Eng Med Biol Soc (IEEE-EMBS 2005). IEEE, Shanghai, China; 2006:345–8.Niederer S, Rhode K, Razavi R, Smith N: The importance of model parameters and boundary conditions in whole organ models of cardiac contraction. In Funct Imaging Model Heart 2009, LNCS 5528. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:348–56.Yang G, Toumoulin C, Coatrieux JL, Shu H, Luo L, Boulmier D: A 3D static heart model from a MSCT data set. In 27th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (IEEE-EMBS 2005). IEEE, Shangai, China; 2006:5499–502.Romero D, Sebastian R, Bijnens BH, Zimmerman V, Boyle PM, Vigmond EJ, et al.: Effects of the purkinje system and cardiac geometry on biventricular pacing: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38: 1388–98.Lorenzo-Valdés M, Sanchez-Ortiz GI, Mohiaddin R, Rueckert D: Atlas-based segmentation and tracking of 3D cardiac MR images using non-rigid registration. In Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2002, LNCS 2488. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2002:642–50.Ordas S, Oubel E, Sebastian R, Frangi AF: Computational anatomy atlas of the heart. In 5th Int Symp Image Signal Process Anal (ISPA 2007). IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey; 2007:338–42.Burton RAB, Plank G, Schneider JE, Grau V, Ahammer H, Keeling SL, et al.: Three-dimensional models of individual cardiac histoanatomy: tools and challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1080: 301–19.Plank G, Burton RAB, Hales P, Bishop M, Mansoori T, Bernabeu MO, et al.: Generation of histo-anatomically representative models of the individual heart: tools and application. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2009, 367: 2257–92.Bishop MJ, Plank G, Burton RAB, Schneider JE, Gavaghan DJ, Grau V, et al.: Development of an anatomically detailed MRI-derived rabbit ventricular model and assessment of its impact on simulations of electrophysiological function. Am J Physiol - Heart Circ Physiol 2010, 298: H699–718.Ecabert O, Peters J, Schramm H, Lorenz C, von Berg J, Walker MJ, et al.: Automatic model-based segmentation of the heart in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008, 27: 1189–201.Ecabert O, Peters J, Walker MJ, Ivanc T, Lorenz C, von Berg J, et al.: Segmentation of the heart and great vessels in CT images using a model-based adaptation framework. Med Image Anal 2011, 15: 863–76.Schulte RF, Sands GB, Sachse FB, Dössel O, Pullan AJ: Creation of a human heart model and its customisation using ultrasound images. Biomed Tech Eng 2001, 46: 26–8.Wenk JF, Zhang Z, Cheng G, Malhotra D, Acevedo-Bolton G, Burger M, et al.: First finite element model of the left ventricle with mitral valve: insights into ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 89: 1546–53.Frangi AF, Rueckert D, Schnabel JA, Niessen WJ: Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002, 21: 1151–66.Hoogendoorn C, Duchateau N, Sánchez-Quintana D, Whitmarsh T, Sukno FM, De Craene M, et al.: A high-resolution atlas and statistical model of the human heart from multislice CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 28–44.Vadakkumpadan F, Rantner LJ, Tice B, Boyle P, Prassl AJ, Vigmond E, et al.: Image-based models of cardiac structure with applications in arrhythmia and defibrillation studies. J Electrocardiol 2009, 42: 157.Perperidis D, Mohiaddin R, Rueckert D: Construction of a 4D statistical atlas of the cardiac anatomy and its use in classification. In Med Image Comput Comput Interv 2005, LNCS 3750. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2005:402–10.Lötjönen J, Kivistö S, Koikkalainen J, Smutek D, Lauerma K: Statistical shape model of atria, ventricles and epicardium from short- and long-axis MR images. Med Image Anal 2004, 8: 371–86.Lorenz C, von Berg J: A comprehensive shape model of the heart. Med Image Anal 2006, 10: 657–70.Mansoori T, Plank G, Burton R, Schneider J, Khol P, Gavaghan D, et al.: An iterative method for registration of high-resolution cardiac histoanatomical and MRI images. In 4th IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI 2007). IEEE, Arlington, VA (USA); 2007:572–5.Gibb M, Burton RAB, Bollensdorff C, Afonso C, Mansoori T, Schotten U, et al.: Resolving the three-dimensional histology of the heart. In Comput Methods Syst Biol - Lect Notes Comput Sci 7605. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2012:2–16.Burton RAB, Lee P, Casero R, Garny A, Siedlecka U, Schneider JE, et al.: Three-dimensional histology: tools and application to quantitative assessment of cell-type distribution in rabbit heart. Europace 2014,16(Suppl 4):iv86–95.Niederer SA, Shetty AK, Plank G, Bostock J, Razavi R, Smith NP, et al.: Biophysical modeling to simulate the response to multisite left ventricular stimulation using a quadripolar pacing lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2012, 35: 204–14.Weese J, Groth A, Nickisch H, Barschdorf H, Weber FM, Velut J, et al.: Generating anatomical models of the heart and the aorta from medical images for personalized physiological simulations. Med Biol Eng Comput 2013, 51: 1209–19.Gibb M, Bishop M, Burton R, Kohl P, Grau V, Plank G, et al.: The role of blood vessels in rabbit propagation dynamics and cardiac arrhythmias. In Funct Imaging Model Heart - FIMH 2009, LNCS 5528. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:268–76.Prassl AJ, Kickinger F, Ahammer H, Grau V, Schneider JE, Hofer E, et al.: Automatically generated, anatomically accurate meshes for cardiac electrophysiology problems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009, 56: 1318–30.Dux-Santoy L, Sebastian R, Felix-Rodriguez J, Ferrero JM, Saiz J: Interaction of specialized cardiac conduction system with antiarrhythmic drugs: a simulation study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011, 58: 3475–8.Lamata P, Niederer S, Nordsletten D, Barber DC, Roy I, Hose DR, et al.: An accurate, fast and robust method to generate patient-specific cubic Hermite meshes. Med Image Anal 2011, 15: 801–13.Pathmanathan P, Cooper J, Fletcher A, Mirams G, Murray P, Osborne J, et al.: A computational study of discrete mechanical tissue models. Phys Biol 2009, 6: 036001.Niederer SA, Kerfoot E, Benson AP, Bernabeu MO, Bernus O, Bradley C, et al.: Verification of cardiac tissue electrophysiology simulators using an N-version benchmark. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2011, 369: 4331–51.Ten Tusscher KHWJ, Panfilov AV: Cell model for efficient simulation of wave propagation in human ventricular tissue under normal and pathological conditions. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51: 6141–56.LeGrice I, Smaill B, Chai L, Edgar S, Gavin J, Hunter P: Laminar structure of the heart: ventricular myocyte arrangement and connective tissue architecture in the dog. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1995, 269: H571–82.Anderson RH, Smerup M, Sanchez-Quintana D, Loukas M, Lunkenheimer PP: The three-dimensional arrangement of the myocytes in the ventricular walls. Clin Anat 2009, 22: 64–76.Clerc L: Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. J Physiol 1976, 255: 335–46.Streeter DD Jr, Spotnitz HM, Patel DP, Ross J Jr, Sonnenblick EH: Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole. Circ Res 1969, 24: 339–47.Scollan D, Holmes A, Winslow R, Forder J: Histological validation of myocardial microstructure obtained from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1998, 275: H2308–18.Hsu EW, Muzikant AL, Matulevicius SA, Penland RC, Henriquez CS: Magnetic resonance myocardial fiber-orientation mapping with direct histological correlation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1998, 274: H1627–34.Holmes AA, Scollan DF, Winslow RL: Direct histological validation of diffusion tensor MRI in formaldehyde-fixed myocardium. Magn Reson Med 2000, 44: 157–61.Sermesant M, Forest C, Pennec X, Delingette H, Ayache N: Deformable biomechanical models: application to 4D cardiac image analysis. Med Image Anal 2003, 7: 475–88.Peyrat JM, Sermesant M, Pennec X, Delingette H, Xu C, McVeigh ER, et al.: A computational framework for the statistical analysis of cardiac diffusion tensors: application to a small database of canine hearts. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007, 26: 1500–14.Toussaint N, Sermesant M, Stoeck CT, Kozerke S, Batchelor PG: In vivo human 3D cardiac fibre architecture: reconstruction using curvilinear interpolation of diffusion tensor images. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2010,13(Pt 1):418–25.Toussaint N, Stoeck CT, Schaeffter T, Kozerke S, Sermesant M, Batchelor PG: In vivo human cardiac fibre architecture estimation using shape-based diffusion tensor processing. Med Image Anal 2013, 17: 1243–55.Bishop MJ, Hales P, Plank G, Gavaghan DJ, Scheider J, Grau V: Comparison of rule-based and DTMRI-derived fibre architecture in a whole rat ventricular computational model. In Funct Imaging Model Heart 2009, LNCS 5528. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:87–96.Bayer JD, Blake RC, Plank G, Trayanova NA: A novel rule-based algorithm for assigning myocardial fiber orientation to computational heart models. Ann Biomed Eng 2012, 40: 2243–54.Dobrzynski H, Anderson RH, Atkinson A, Borbas Z, D’Souza A, Fraser JF, et al.: Structure, function and clinical relevance of the cardiac conduction system, including the atrioventricular ring and outflow tract tissues. Pharmacol Ther 2013, 139: 260–88.Tranum-Jensen J, Wilde AA, Vermeulen JT, Janse MJ: Morphology of electrophysiologically identified junctions between Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle in rabbit and pig hearts. Circ Res 1991, 69: 429–37.Boyle PM, Deo M, Plank G, Vigmond EJ: Purkinje-mediated effects in the response of quiescent ventricles to defibrillation shocks. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38: 456–68.Behradfar E, Nygren A, Vigmond EJ: The role of Purkinje-myocardial coupling during ventricular arrhythmia: a modeling study. PLoS One 2014., 9: Article ID e88000DiFrancesco D, Noble D: A model of cardiac electrical activity incorporating ionic pumps and concentration changes. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 1985, 307: 353–98.Stewart P, Aslanidi OV, Noble D, Noble PJ, Boyett MR, Zhang H: Mathematical models of the electrical action potential of Purkinje fibre cells. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2009, 367: 2225–55.Li P, Rudy Y: A model of canine purkinje cell electrophysiology and Ca(2+) cycling: rate dependence, triggered activity, and comparison to ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 2011, 109: 71–9.Chinchapatnam P, Rhode KS, Ginks M, Mansi T, Peyrat JM, Lambiase P, et al.: Estimation of volumetric myocardial apparent conductivity from endocardial electro-anatomical mapping. In 31st Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC 2009). IEEE, Minneapolis, MN (USA); 2009:2907–10.Durrer D, Van Dam RT, Freud GE, Janse MJ, Meijler FL, Arzbaecher RC: Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 1970, 41: 899–912.Pollard AE, Barr RC: Computer simulations of activation in an anatomically based model of the human ventricular conduction system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991, 38: 982–96.Abboud S, Berenfeld O, Sadeh D: Simulation of high-resolution QRS complex using a ventricular model with a fractal conduction system. Effects of ischemia on high-frequency QRS potentials. Circ Res 1991, 68: 1751–60.Sebastian R, Zimmerman V, Romero D, Sanchez-Quintana D, Frangi AF: Characterization and modeling of the peripheral cardiac conduction system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 45–55.Bordas R, Gillow K, Lou Q, Efimov IR, Gavaghan D, Kohl P, et al.: Rabbit-specific ventricular model of cardiac electrophysiological function including specialized conduction system. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2011, 107: 90–100.Stephenson RS, Boyett MR, Hart G, Nikolaidou T, Cai X, Corno AF, et al.: Contrast enhanced micro-computed tomography resolves the 3-dimensional morphology of the cardiac conduction system in mammalian hearts. PLoS One 2012., 7: Article ID e35299Berenfeld O, Jalife J: Purkinje-Muscle reentry as a mechanism of polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias in a 3-dimensional model of the ventricles. Circ Res 1998, 82: 1063–77.Azzouzi A, Coudière Y, Turpault R, Zemzemi N: A mathematical model of the Purkinje-muscle junctions. Math Biosci Eng MBE 2011, 8: 915–30.Dux-Santoy L, Sebastian R, Rodriguez JF, Ferrero JM: Modeling the different sections of the cardiac conduction system to obtain realistic electrocardiograms. In 35th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC 2013). IEEE, Osaka, Japan; 2013:6846–9.Cardenes R, Sebastian R, Berruezo A, Camara O: Inverse

Image-Based Cardiac Diagnosis With Machine Learning: A Review

Cardiac imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Until now, its role has been limited to visual and quantitative assessment of cardiac structure and function. However, with the advent of big data and machine learning, new opportunities are emerging to build artificial intelligence tools that will directly assist the clinician in the diagnosis of CVDs. This paper presents a thorough review of recent works in this field and provide the reader with a detailed presentation of the machine learning methods that can be further exploited to enable more automated, precise and early diagnosis of most CVDs

Deep learning for unsupervised domain adaptation in medical imaging: Recent advancements and future perspectives

Deep learning has demonstrated remarkable performance across various tasks in medical imaging. However, these approaches primarily focus on supervised learning, assuming that the training and testing data are drawn from the same distribution. Unfortunately, this assumption may not always hold true in practice. To address these issues, unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) techniques have been developed to transfer knowledge from a labeled domain to a related but unlabeled domain. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in UDA, resulting in a wide range of methodologies, including feature alignment, image translation, self-supervision, and disentangled representation methods, among others. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive literature review of recent deep UDA approaches in medical imaging from a technical perspective. Specifically, we categorize current UDA research in medical imaging into six groups and further divide them into finer subcategories based on the different tasks they perform. We also discuss the respective datasets used in the studies to assess the divergence between the different domains. Finally, we discuss emerging areas and provide insights and discussions on future research directions to conclude this survey.Comment: Under Revie

Exploring variability in medical imaging

Although recent successes of deep learning and novel machine learning techniques improved the perfor- mance of classification and (anomaly) detection in computer vision problems, the application of these methods in medical imaging pipeline remains a very challenging task. One of the main reasons for this is the amount of variability that is encountered and encapsulated in human anatomy and subsequently reflected in medical images. This fundamental factor impacts most stages in modern medical imaging processing pipelines. Variability of human anatomy makes it virtually impossible to build large datasets for each disease with labels and annotation for fully supervised machine learning. An efficient way to cope with this is to try and learn only from normal samples. Such data is much easier to collect. A case study of such an automatic anomaly detection system based on normative learning is presented in this work. We present a framework for detecting fetal cardiac anomalies during ultrasound screening using generative models, which are trained only utilising normal/healthy subjects. However, despite the significant improvement in automatic abnormality detection systems, clinical routine continues to rely exclusively on the contribution of overburdened medical experts to diagnosis and localise abnormalities. Integrating human expert knowledge into the medical imaging processing pipeline entails uncertainty which is mainly correlated with inter-observer variability. From the per- spective of building an automated medical imaging system, it is still an open issue, to what extent this kind of variability and the resulting uncertainty are introduced during the training of a model and how it affects the final performance of the task. Consequently, it is very important to explore the effect of inter-observer variability both, on the reliable estimation of model’s uncertainty, as well as on the model’s performance in a specific machine learning task. A thorough investigation of this issue is presented in this work by leveraging automated estimates for machine learning model uncertainty, inter-observer variability and segmentation task performance in lung CT scan images. Finally, a presentation of an overview of the existing anomaly detection methods in medical imaging was attempted. This state-of-the-art survey includes both conventional pattern recognition methods and deep learning based methods. It is one of the first literature surveys attempted in the specific research area.Open Acces