Nontrivial and Universal Helping for Wait-Free Queues and Stacks

This paper studies two approaches to formalize helping in wait-free implementations of shared objects. The first approach is based on operation valency, and it allows us to make the important distinction between trivial and nontrivial helping. We show that a wait-free implementation of a queue from common2 objects (e.g., Test&Set) requires nontrivial helping. In contrast, there is a wait-free implementation of a stack from Common2 objects with only trivial helping. This separation might shed light on the difficulty of implementing a queue from Common2 objects. The other approach formalizes the helping mechanism employed by Herlihy\u27s universal wait-free construction and is based on having an operation by one process restrict the possible linearizations of operations by other processes. We show that objects possessing such universal helping can be used to solve consensus

Lock-free Concurrent Data Structures

Concurrent data structures are the data sharing side of parallel programming. Data structures give the means to the program to store data, but also provide operations to the program to access and manipulate these data. These operations are implemented through algorithms that have to be efficient. In the sequential setting, data structures are crucially important for the performance of the respective computation. In the parallel programming setting, their importance becomes more crucial because of the increased use of data and resource sharing for utilizing parallelism. The first and main goal of this chapter is to provide a sufficient background and intuition to help the interested reader to navigate in the complex research area of lock-free data structures. The second goal is to offer the programmer familiarity to the subject that will allow her to use truly concurrent methods.Comment: To appear in "Programming Multi-core and Many-core Computing Systems", eds. S. Pllana and F. Xhafa, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computin

Crafting Concurrent Data Structures

Concurrent data structures lie at the heart of modern parallel programs. The design and implementation of concurrent data structures can be challenging due to the demand for good performance (low latency and high scalability) and strong progress guarantees. In this dissertation, we enrich the knowledge of concurrent data structure design by proposing new implementations, as well as general techniques to improve the performance of existing ones.The first part of the dissertation present an unordered linked list implementation that supports nonblocking insert, remove, and lookup operations. The algorithm is based on a novel ``enlist\u27\u27 technique that greatly simplifies the task of achieving wait-freedom. The value of our technique is also demonstrated in the creation of other wait-free data structures such as stacks and hash tables.The second data structure presented is a nonblocking hash table implementation which solves a long-standing design challenge by permitting the hash table to dynamically adjust its size in a nonblocking manner. Additionally, our hash table offers strong theoretical properties such as supporting unbounded memory. In our algorithm, we introduce a new ``freezable set\u27\u27 abstraction which allows us to achieve atomic migration of keys during a resize. The freezable set abstraction also enables highly efficient implementations which maximally exploit the processor cache locality. In experiments, we found our lock-free hash table performs consistently better than state-of-the-art implementations, such as the split-ordered list.The third data structure we present is a concurrent priority queue called the ``mound\u27\u27. Our implementations include nonblocking and lock-based variants. The mound employs randomization to reduce contention on concurrent insert operations, and decomposes a remove operation into smaller atomic operations so that multiple remove operations can execute in parallel within a pipeline. In experiments, we show that the mound can provide excellent latency at low thread counts.Lastly, we discuss how hardware transactional memory (HTM) can be used to accelerate existing nonblocking concurrent data structure implementations. We propose optimization techniques that can significantly improve the performance (1.5x to 3x speedups) of a variety of important concurrent data structures, such as binary search trees and hash tables. The optimizations also preserve the strong progress guarantees of the original implementations

Fast Nonblocking Persistence for Concurrent Data Structures

We present a fully lock-free variant of our recent Montage system for persistent data structures. The variant, nbMontage, adds persistence to almost any nonblocking concurrent structure without introducing significant overhead or blocking of any kind. Like its predecessor, nbMontage is buffered durably linearizable: it guarantees that the state recovered in the wake of a crash will represent a consistent prefix of pre-crash execution. Unlike its predecessor, nbMontage ensures wait-free progress of the persistence frontier, thereby bounding the number of recent updates that may be lost on a crash, and allowing a thread to force an update of the frontier (i.e., to perform a sync operation) without the risk of blocking. As an extra benefit, the helping mechanism employed by our wait-free sync significantly reduces its latency. Performance results for nonblocking queues, skip lists, trees, and hash tables rival custom data structures in the literature - dramatically faster than achieved with prior general-purpose systems, and generally within 50% of equivalent non-persistent structures placed in DRAM