2,477 research outputs found
Non-idempotent intersection types in logical form
Intersection types are an essential tool in the analysis of operational and denotational properties of lambda-terms and functional programs. Among them, non-idempotent intersection types provide precise quantitative information about the evaluation of terms and programs. However, unlike simple or second-order types, intersection types cannot be considered as a logical system because the application rule (or the intersection rule, depending on the presentation of the system) involves a condition expressing that the proofs of premises satisfy a very strong uniformity condition: the underlying lambda-terms must be the same. Using earlier work introducing an indexed version of Linear Logic, we show that non-idempotent typing can be given a logical form in a system where formulas represent hereditarily indexed families of intersection types
Inhabitation for Non-idempotent Intersection Types
The inhabitation problem for intersection types in the lambda-calculus is
known to be undecidable. We study the problem in the case of non-idempotent
intersection, considering several type assignment systems, which characterize
the solvable or the strongly normalizing lambda-terms. We prove the
decidability of the inhabitation problem for all the systems considered, by
providing sound and complete inhabitation algorithms for them
Bounding normalization time through intersection types
Non-idempotent intersection types are used in order to give a bound of the
length of the normalization beta-reduction sequence of a lambda term: namely,
the bound is expressed as a function of the size of the term.Comment: In Proceedings ITRS 2012, arXiv:1307.784
Call-by-value non-determinism in a linear logic type discipline
We consider the call-by-value lambda-calculus extended with a may-convergent
non-deterministic choice and a must-convergent parallel composition. Inspired
by recent works on the relational semantics of linear logic and non-idempotent
intersection types, we endow this calculus with a type system based on the
so-called Girard's second translation of intuitionistic logic into linear
logic. We prove that a term is typable if and only if it is converging, and
that its typing tree carries enough information to give a bound on the length
of its lazy call-by-value reduction. Moreover, when the typing tree is minimal,
such a bound becomes the exact length of the reduction
A semantic account of strong normalization in Linear Logic
We prove that given two cut free nets of linear logic, by means of their
relational interpretations one can: 1) first determine whether or not the net
obtained by cutting the two nets is strongly normalizable 2) then (in case it
is strongly normalizable) compute the maximal length of the reduction sequences
starting from that net.Comment: 41 page
Relational type-checking for MELL proof-structures. Part 1: Multiplicatives
Relational semantics for linear logic is a form of non-idempotent
intersection type system, from which several informations on the execution of a
proof-structure can be recovered. An element of the relational interpretation
of a proof-structure R with conclusion acts thus as a type (refining
) having R as an inhabitant. We are interested in the following
type-checking question: given a proof-structure R, a list of formulae ,
and a point x in the relational interpretation of , is x in the
interpretation of R? This question is decidable. We present here an algorithm
that decides it in time linear in the size of R, if R is a proof-structure in
the multiplicative fragment of linear logic. This algorithm can be extended to
larger fragments of multiplicative-exponential linear logic containing
-calculus
- …