125,764 research outputs found
Sequentiality vs. Concurrency in Games and Logic
Connections between the sequentiality/concurrency distinction and the
semantics of proofs are investigated, with particular reference to games and
Linear Logic.Comment: 35 pages, appeared in Mathematical Structures in Computer Scienc
Tree games with regular objectives
We study tree games developed recently by Matteo Mio as a game interpretation
of the probabilistic -calculus. With expressive power comes complexity.
Mio showed that tree games are able to encode Blackwell games and,
consequently, are not determined under deterministic strategies.
We show that non-stochastic tree games with objectives recognisable by
so-called game automata are determined under deterministic, finite memory
strategies. Moreover, we give an elementary algorithmic procedure which, for an
arbitrary regular language L and a finite non-stochastic tree game with a
winning objective L decides if the game is determined under deterministic
strategies.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
Strategy Logic with Imperfect Information
We introduce an extension of Strategy Logic for the imperfect-information
setting, called SLii, and study its model-checking problem. As this logic
naturally captures multi-player games with imperfect information, the problem
turns out to be undecidable. We introduce a syntactical class of "hierarchical
instances" for which, intuitively, as one goes down the syntactic tree of the
formula, strategy quantifications are concerned with finer observations of the
model. We prove that model-checking SLii restricted to hierarchical instances
is decidable. This result, because it allows for complex patterns of
existential and universal quantification on strategies, greatly generalises
previous ones, such as decidability of multi-player games with imperfect
information and hierarchical observations, and decidability of distributed
synthesis for hierarchical systems. To establish the decidability result, we
introduce and study QCTL*ii, an extension of QCTL* (itself an extension of CTL*
with second-order quantification over atomic propositions) by parameterising
its quantifiers with observations. The simple syntax of QCTL* ii allows us to
provide a conceptually neat reduction of SLii to QCTL*ii that separates
concerns, allowing one to forget about strategies and players and focus solely
on second-order quantification. While the model-checking problem of QCTL*ii is,
in general, undecidable, we identify a syntactic fragment of hierarchical
formulas and prove, using an automata-theoretic approach, that it is decidable.
The decidability result for SLii follows since the reduction maps hierarchical
instances of SLii to hierarchical formulas of QCTL*ii
Complete Axiomatizations of Fragments of Monadic Second-Order Logic on Finite Trees
We consider a specific class of tree structures that can represent basic
structures in linguistics and computer science such as XML documents, parse
trees, and treebanks, namely, finite node-labeled sibling-ordered trees. We
present axiomatizations of the monadic second-order logic (MSO), monadic
transitive closure logic (FO(TC1)) and monadic least fixed-point logic
(FO(LFP1)) theories of this class of structures. These logics can express
important properties such as reachability. Using model-theoretic techniques, we
show by a uniform argument that these axiomatizations are complete, i.e., each
formula that is valid on all finite trees is provable using our axioms. As a
backdrop to our positive results, on arbitrary structures, the logics that we
study are known to be non-recursively axiomatizable
Visibly Pushdown Modular Games
Games on recursive game graphs can be used to reason about the control flow
of sequential programs with recursion. In games over recursive game graphs, the
most natural notion of strategy is the modular strategy, i.e., a strategy that
is local to a module and is oblivious to previous module invocations, and thus
does not depend on the context of invocation. In this work, we study for the
first time modular strategies with respect to winning conditions that can be
expressed by a pushdown automaton.
We show that such games are undecidable in general, and become decidable for
visibly pushdown automata specifications.
Our solution relies on a reduction to modular games with finite-state
automata winning conditions, which are known in the literature.
We carefully characterize the computational complexity of the considered
decision problem. In particular, we show that modular games with a universal
Buchi or co Buchi visibly pushdown winning condition are EXPTIME-complete, and
when the winning condition is given by a CARET or NWTL temporal logic formula
the problem is 2EXPTIME-complete, and it remains 2EXPTIME-hard even for simple
fragments of these logics.
As a further contribution, we present a different solution for modular games
with finite-state automata winning condition that runs faster than known
solutions for large specifications and many exits.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
- …