11,618 research outputs found
A Survey on Alliances and Related Parameters in Graphs
In this paper, we show that several graph parameters are known in different areas under completely different names.More specifically, our observations connect signed domination, monopolies, -domination, -independence,positive influence domination,and a parameter associated to fast information propagationin networks to parameters related to various notions of global -alliances in graphs.We also propose a new framework, called (global) -alliances, not only in order to characterizevarious known variants of alliance and domination parameters, but also to suggest a unifying framework for the study of alliances and domination.Finally, we also give a survey on the mentioned graph parameters, indicating how results transfer due to our observations
Signed double Roman domination on cubic graphs
The signed double Roman domination problem is a combinatorial optimization
problem on a graph asking to assign a label from to each
vertex feasibly, such that the total sum of assigned labels is minimized. Here
feasibility is given whenever (i) vertices labeled have at least one
neighbor with label in ; (ii) each vertex labeled has one
-labeled neighbor or at least two -labeled neighbors; and (iii) the sum
of labels over the closed neighborhood of any vertex is positive. The
cumulative weight of an optimal labeling is called signed double Roman
domination number (SDRDN). In this work, we first consider the problem on
general cubic graphs of order for which we present a sharp
lower bound for the SDRDN by means of the discharging method. Moreover, we
derive a new best upper bound. Observing that we are often able to minimize the
SDRDN over the class of cubic graphs of a fixed order, we then study in this
context generalized Petersen graphs for independent interest, for which we
propose a constraint programming guided proof. We then use these insights to
determine the SDRDNs of subcubic grid graphs, among other results
A Hierachical Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization in IMRT
Purpose: Current inverse planning methods for IMRT are limited because they
are not designed to explore the trade-offs between the competing objectives
between the tumor and normal tissues. Our goal was to develop an efficient
multiobjective optimization algorithm that was flexible enough to handle any
form of objective function and that resulted in a set of Pareto optimal plans.
Methods: We developed a hierarchical evolutionary multiobjective algorithm
designed to quickly generate a diverse Pareto optimal set of IMRT plans that
meet all clinical constraints and reflect the trade-offs in the plans. The top
level of the hierarchical algorithm is a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm
(MOEA). The genes of the individuals generated in the MOEA are the parameters
that define the penalty function minimized during an accelerated deterministic
IMRT optimization that represents the bottom level of the hierarchy. The MOEA
incorporates clinical criteria to restrict the search space through protocol
objectives and then uses Pareto optimality among the fitness objectives to
select individuals.
Results: Acceleration techniques implemented on both levels of the
hierarchical algorithm resulted in short, practical runtimes for optimizations.
The MOEA improvements were evaluated for example prostate cases with one target
and two OARs. The modified MOEA dominated 11.3% of plans using a standard
genetic algorithm package. By implementing domination advantage and protocol
objectives, small diverse populations of clinically acceptable plans that were
only dominated 0.2% by the Pareto front could be generated in a fraction of an
hour.
Conclusions: Our MOEA produces a diverse Pareto optimal set of plans that
meet all dosimetric protocol criteria in a feasible amount of time. It
optimizes not only beamlet intensities but also objective function parameters
on a patient-specific basis
The Power of Small Coalitions under Two-Tier Majority on Regular Graphs
In this paper, we study the following problem. Consider a setting where a
proposal is offered to the vertices of a given network , and the vertices
must conduct a vote and decide whether to accept the proposal or reject it.
Each vertex has its own valuation of the proposal; we say that is
``happy'' if its valuation is positive (i.e., it expects to gain from adopting
the proposal) and ``sad'' if its valuation is negative. However, vertices do
not base their vote merely on their own valuation. Rather, a vertex is a
\emph{proponent} of the proposal if the majority of its neighbors are happy
with it and an \emph{opponent} in the opposite case. At the end of the vote,
the network collectively accepts the proposal whenever the majority of its
vertices are proponents. We study this problem for regular graphs with loops.
Specifically, we consider the class of -regular graphs
of odd order with all loops and happy vertices. We are interested
in establishing necessary and sufficient conditions for the class
to contain a labeled graph accepting the proposal, as
well as conditions to contain a graph rejecting the proposal. We also discuss
connections to the existing literature, including that on majority domination,
and investigate the properties of the obtained conditions.Comment: 28 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in Discrete Applied
Mathematic
- …